Observing Teaching: A Lens for Self-reflection
Keywords:peer observation, learning, reflection.
Peer observation is often an unpopular form of professional development amongst faculty. Some of the reasons for this attitude are practical and logistical difficulties in organisation, possible threat to professionalism and uncertainty of aims and processes. However, peer observation with a specific focus on learning can be an essential form of professional development amongst faculty in a higher education institution. This paper describes a peer observation programme which took place at an English language medium university in the Gulf. Results suggest that teachers found peer observations provided learning opportunities and affective benefits and impacted positively on teaching.
Allwright, D. (2005). Developing principles for practitioner research: The case of exploratory practice. Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 353–366.
Bell, A., & Mladenovic, R. (2008). The benefits of peer observation of teaching for tutor development. Higher Education, 55, 735–752.
Blackwell, R., & McLean, M. (1996). Peer observation of teaching and staff development. Higher Education Quarterly, 50(2), 156–171.
Blaisdell, M. L., & Cox, M. D. (2004). Midcareer and senior faculty learning communities: Learning throughout faculty careers. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 97, 137–148.
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching – a review of research on what language teachers think, believe and do. Language Teaching, 5(4), 261–267.
Brancato, V. C. (2003). Professional development in higher education. In New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 98, 59–65.
Cosh, J. (1999). Peer observation: A reflective model. ELT Journal, 53(1), 22–27.
Day, R. R. (1990). Teacher observation in second language teacher education. In J. C. Richards & D. Nunan (Eds.), Second language teacher education (pp. 43–61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eddy, P. L., & Garza Mitchell, R. L. (2012). Faculty as learners: Developing thinking communities. Innovative Higher Education, 37(4), 283–296.
Fanselow, J. F. (1988). “Let’s see”: Contrasting conversations about teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 22(1), 114–131.
Gebhard, J. G., Gaitan, S., & Oprandy, R. (1990). Beyond prescription: The student teacher as investigator. In J. C. Richards & D. Nunan (Eds.), Second language teacher education (pp. 16–25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gosling, D. (2002). Models of peer observation of teaching. Learning and Teaching Support Network. Retrieved from http://learningandteaching.vu.edu.au/teaching_practice/improve_my_teaching/evaluation_support_for_my_teaching/Resources/id200_Models_of_Peer_Observation_of_Teaching.pdf
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Routledge.
Hendry, G. F., & Oliver, G. R. (2012). Seeing is believing: The benefits of peer observation. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 9(1), 1–9.
Johnson, K. E. (2009). Second language teacher education: A socio-cultural perspective. Abingdon: Taylor and Francis.
Laksov, K. B., McGrath, C., & Silen, C. (2010). Scholarship of teaching and learning – the road to an academic perspective on teaching. Centre for Medical Education at the department of LIME. Guide no. 6.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: CUP.
Le, P. T. A., & Vasquez, C. (2011). Feedback in teacher education; mentor discourse and intern perceptions. Teacher development: An international journal of teachers’ professional development, 15(4), 453–470.
Lomas, L., & Kinchin, I. (2006). Developing a peer observation program with university teachers. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education,18(3), 204–214.
Mann, S. (2005). The language teacher’s development. Language Teaching, 38, 103–118.
Marcos, J. J. M., Sanchez, E., & Tilleman, H. (2008). Teachers reflecting on their work: Articulating what is said about what is done. Teachers and Teaching, Theory and Practice, 14(2), 95–114.
Murdoch, G. (2000). Introducing a teacher-supportive evaluation system. ELT Journal, 54(1), 54–64.
Peel, D. (2005). Peer observation as a transformatory tool. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(4), pp. 489–504.
Richards, J. C. (1998). Beyond training. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (Eds). (1996). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative Inquiry in TESOL. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Roscoe, J. (2002). Continuing professional development in higher education. Human Resource Development International, 5(1), 1–9.
Schuck, S., Aubuson, P., & Buchanan, J. (2008). Enhancing teacher education practice through professional learning conversations. European Journal of Teacher Education, 31(2), 215–227.
Vygotksy, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wajnryb, R. (1992). Classroom observation tasks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wallace, M. J. (1991). Training foreign language teachers: A reflective approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wang, Q., & Seth, N. (1998). Self-development through classroom observations: Changing perceptions in China. English Language Teaching Journal, 52(3), 205–213.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.