Teaching development for early-career faculty: Changing how we think about teaching

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56433/tk5t1q73

Keywords:

teaching development, teaching conceptions, teaching identity, reflection, foundations in teaching

Abstract

Abstract 

This paper presents an early-stage, collaborative reflective analysis of experience in a doctoral-level course Foundations of Teaching, aimed at challenging participants' underlying conceptions of teaching and learning. The course design was grounded in the premise that for development of teacher identity and a meaningful change in teaching practice we need to address teachers’ understanding of what teaching is. Drawing on reflections from the course instructor and participating doctoral students who are co-authors of this paper, we apply thematic analysis to identify preliminary themes relating to which aspects of the course supported shifts in participants' conceptions of teaching and why these changes may have occurred. The paper contributes to discussions about how doctoral education can prepare future academics for teaching through transformative rather than purely skills-based approaches.

 

Author Biographies

  • Gorana Misic, University of Glasgow

    Dr Gorana Misic (SFHEA) is a Learning Innovation Officer (academic developer) at the Adam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow, where she leads and teaches in the Teaching Development Programme for Graduate Teaching Assistants. She is also a Visiting Faculty member at Eötvös Loránd University and the University of Rijeka. Her work and research focus on higher education teaching and learning, with particular interests in academic development and mentoring of novice teachers in higher education.

  • Sulemana Abdul-Karim

    Participant in the course Foundations in Teaching, a part of the Teaching Development Programme for Graduate Teaching Assistants, Adam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow. 

  • Ghaida Alhooshani

    Participant in the course Foundations in Teaching, a part of the Teaching Development Programme for Graduate Teaching Assistants, Adam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow. 

  • Ali Awad

    Participant in the course Foundations in Teaching, a part of the Teaching Development Programme for Graduate Teaching Assistants, Adam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow. 

  • Ahmed Farhod

    Participant in the course Foundations in Teaching, a part of the Teaching Development Programme for Graduate Teaching Assistants, Adam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow. 

  • Jifeng Hong

    Participant in the course Foundations in Teaching, a part of the Teaching Development Programme for Graduate Teaching Assistants, Adam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow. 

  • Nawawan Panburana

    Participant in the course Foundations in Teaching, a part of the Teaching Development Programme for Graduate Teaching Assistants, Adam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow. 

  • David Youssef

    Participant in the course Foundations in Teaching, a part of the Teaching Development Programme for Graduate Teaching Assistants, Adam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow. 

  • Yifan Zhou

    Participant in the course Foundations in Teaching, a part of the Teaching Development Programme for Graduate Teaching Assistants, Adam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow. 

References

Åkerlind, G. S. (2004). A new dimension to understanding university teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 9(3), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251042000216679

Åkerlind, G. S. (2007). Constraints on academics’ potential for developing as a teacher. Studies in Higher Education, 32(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070601099416

Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Harvard University Press.

Bale, R., & Anderson, M. (2024). Teacher identities of graduate teaching assistants: how we (De)legitimise GTAs’ role identities. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(5), 1133–1148. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2109015

Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999). Peer Learning and Assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293990240405

Bovill, C., Cook‐Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co‐creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690

Kugel, P. (1993). How professors develop as teachers. Studies in Higher Education, 18(3), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079312331382241

McDaniels, M. (2010). Doctoral student socialization for teaching roles. In Gardner, S.K., & Mendoza, P. (Eds.). On Becoming a Scholar: Socialization and Development in Doctoral Education (pp. 29-44). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003446187

McLeod, C. L., Almquist, C. B., Ess, M. P., Zhang, J., Schultz, H., Nguyen, T., Tran, K., & Hughes, M. (2025). Graduate Teaching Assistants (GTAs): Roles, Perspectives, and Prioritizing GTA Workforce Development Pathways. Education Sciences, 15(7), 838. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070838

Mimirinis, M., & Ahlberg, K. (2021). Variation in education doctoral students’ conceptions of university teaching. British Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 557–578. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3669

Nasser-Abu Alhija, F., & Fresko, B. (2021). Challenges of being a graduate teaching assistant. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(6), 1220–1235. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1806790

Sadera, E., Suonio, E. E., Chen, J. C. C., Herbert, R., Hsu, D., Bogdan, B., & Kool, B. (2024). Strategies and approaches for delivering sustainable training and professional development of graduate teaching assistants, teaching assistants, and tutors: a scoping review. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(5), 2199-2215. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-08-2023-0323

Shum, A., Lau, P., & Fryer, L. (2020). From learner to teacher: (re)training graduate teaching assistants’ teaching approaches and developing self-efficacy for and interest in teaching. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(7), 1546–1563. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1818063

Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher education, 37(1), 57-70. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003548313194

Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Ascd.

Winstone, N., & Moore, D. (2017). Sometimes fish, sometimes fowl? Liminality, identity work and identity malleability in graduate teaching assistants. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(5), 494–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1194769

Published

2026-09-04

Issue

Section

On the Horizon