ANCORing Generative AI within the Computing Curriculum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56433/vmnhhk83Keywords:
ethics, computing curricula, generative AI, Large Language Models, instructor insightsAbstract
Generative AI and Large Language Models have become ubiquitous across education and within higher education institutions. Emerging challenges include potential over-reliance on Generative AI, risks to academic integrity, and inequitable access: there is an urgent need for students to develop ethical, self-regulated and grounded learning practices in its use. This paper presents insights distilled from a survey of 14 computer science educators in the UK, and identifies the overarching importance of teaching responsibility and ethical implications of the use of AI to students. The ANCOR framework is presented as a method for teaching responsible Generative AI use, integrating ethical reasoning, real-world examples, and curriculum-wide approaches. It offers a novel contribution by providing both actionable teaching techniques and a conceptual approach for embedding ethical and responsible use of Generative AI tools across computing curricula, including guidance on ethics integration, contextualising relevant policies, developing ethical decision-making skills, addressing anthropomorphism, and using illustrative real-world cases.
References
ACM Publications Board. (2023, April). ACM policy on Authorship. Association for Computing Machinery. https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/new-acm-policy-on-authorship
Amoozadeh, M., Daniels, D., Nam, D., Kumar, A., Chen, S., Hilton, M., Srinivasa Ragavan, S., & Alipour, M. A. (2024). Trust in Generative AI among Students: An exploratory study. Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1145/3626252.3630842
Becker, B. A., Craig, M., Denny, P., Keuning, H., Kiesler, N., Leinonen, J., Luxton-Reilly, A., Prather, J., & Quille, K. (2023). Generative AI in introductory programming. Association for Computing Machinery.
Becker, B. A., Denny, P., Finnie-Ansley, J., Luxton-Reilly, A., Prather, J., & Santos, E. A. (2023). Programming Is Hard—Or at Least It Used to Be: Educational Opportunities and Challenges of AI Code Generation. Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1, 500–506. https://doi.org/10.1145/3545945.3569759
Beluzzi, F., Condorelli, V., & Giuffrida, G. (2024). Does It Really Work? Perception of Reliability of ChatGPT in Daily Use. Italian Sociological Review, 14(10S), 625–655.
Cambaz, D., & Zhang, X. (2024). Use of AI-driven Code Generation Models in Teaching and Learning Programming: A Systematic Literature Review. Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1, 172–178. https://doi.org/10.1145/3626252.3630958
Ciampa, K., Wolfe, Z. M., & Bronstein, B. (2023). ChatGPT in education: Transforming digital literacy practices. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 67(3), 186–195.
Denny, P., Prather, J., Becker, B. A., Finnie-Ansley, J., Hellas, A., Leinonen, J., Luxton-Reilly, A., Reeves, B. N., Santos, E. A., & Sarsa, S. (2024). Computing Education in the Era of Generative AI. Commun. ACM, 67(2), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1145/3624720
Education, Q. A. A. for H. (2023a, Jan). The rise of artificial intelligence software and potential risks for academic integrity: Briefing paper for higher education providers. In QAA advice and resources on Generative AI. https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/members/the-rise-of-artificial-intelligence-software-and-potential-risks-for-academic-integrity.pdf?sfvrsn=ebb0a981_6
Education, Q. A. A. for H. (2023b, May). Maintaining quality and standards in the ChatGPT era: QAA advice on the opportunities and challenges posed by Generative Artificial Intelligence. In QAA advice and resources on Generative AI. https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/members/maintaining-quality-and-standards-in-the-chatgpt-era.pdf?sfvrsn=2408aa81_10
Education, Q. A. A. for H. (2023c, July). Reconsidering assessment for the Chat GPT era: QAA advice on developing sustainable assessment strategies. In QAA advice and resources on Generative AI. https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/members/reconsidering-assessment-for-the-chat-gpt-era.pdf?sfvrsn=38d3af81_6
Finnie-Ansley, J., Denny, P., Becker, B. A., Luxton-Reilly, A., & Prather, J. (2022). The Robots Are Coming: Exploring the Implications of OpenAI Codex on Introductory Programming. Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Computing Education Conference, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3511861.3511863
Gabriel, I., Manzini, A., Keeling, G., Hendricks, L. A., Rieser, V., Iqbal, H., Tomašev, N., Ktena, I., Kenton, Z., Rodriguez, M., & others. (2024). The ethics of advanced ai assistants. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2404.16244.
Goetze, T. S. (2023). Integrating Ethics into Computer Science Education: Multi-, Inter-, and Transdisciplinary Approaches. Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1, 645–651.
Grosz, B. J., Grant, D. G., Vredenburgh, K., Behrends, J., Hu, L., Simmons, A., & Waldo, J. (2019). Embedded EthiCS: integrating ethics across CS education. Communications of the ACM, 62(8), 54–61.
Mahon, J., Mac Namee, B., & Becker, B. A. (2024). Guidelines for the Evolving Role of Generative AI in Introductory Programming Based on Emerging Practice. In Proceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1 (pp. 10–16).
Prather, J., Denny, P., Leinonen, J., Becker, B. A., Albluwi, I., Craig, M., Keuning, H., Kiesler, N., Kohn, T., Luxton-Reilly, A., MacNeil, S., Petersen, A., Pettit, R., Reeves, B. N., & Savelka, J. (2023). The Robots Are Here: Navigating the Generative AI Revolution in Computing Education. Proceedings of the 2023 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 108–159. https://doi.org/10.1145/3623762.3633499
Robert Gordon University. (2024, January). Generative AI Guidance (external facing). In Generative AI - RGU Harvard Templates—LibGuides at Robert Gordon University. https://library.rgu.ac.uk/harvard-referencing-templates/generative-ai
Salah, M., Abdelfattah, F., Alhalbusi, H., & Al Mukhaini, M. (2024). Me and My AI Bot: Exploring the’AIholic’Phenomenon and University Students’ Dependency on Generative AI Chatbots-Is This the New Academic Addiction?
Smith, C. E., Shiekh, K., Cooreman, H., Rahman, S., Zhu, Y., Siam, M. K., Ivanitskiy, M., Ahmed, A. M., Hallinan, M., Grisak, A., & Fierro, G. (2024). Early Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Computing Education: Emergent Student Use Cases and Perspectives in 2023. Proceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1, 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3649217.3653575
University of Strathclyde. (2024). Student Discipline Procedure: Academic Misconduct. https://www.strath.ac.uk/media/ps/cs/gmap/academicaffairs/policies/Student_Discipline_Procedure_-_Academic_Misconduct.pdf
Yan, L., Sha, L., Zhao, L., Li, Y., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Chen, G., Li, X., Jin, Y., & Gašević, D. (2024). Practical and ethical challenges of large language models in education: A systematic scoping review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(1), 90–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13370
Zarb, M., Brown, J. N. A., Goodfellow, M., Liaskos, K., & Young, T. (2024). Ethical Implications of Gen-AI and LLMs in Computing Education. Proceedings of the 2024 on ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference V. 2, 293–294. https://doi.org/10.1145/3649409.3691074
Zhang, L., & Xu, J. (2024). The paradox of self-efficacy and technological dependence: Unraveling generative AI’s impact on university students’ task completion. The Internet and Higher Education, 100978.
Zyda, M. (2024). Generative AI changes the world, maybe. Computer, 57(09), 118–123.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mark Zarb, Martin Goodfellow
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
