Beyond recommendations: The emotional and relational foundations of inclusion

Authors

  • Angelos Bakogiannis University of Salford
  • Evie Papavasiliou University of Leeds

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56433/nn1rtx25

Keywords:

inclusion, emotionality , relationality, English for academic purposes, higher education

Abstract

Inclusion has become a defining concept in higher education (HE), shaping pedagogical discourse and institutional strategy. Within English for Academic Purposes (EAP), however, inclusive practice is often approached procedurally rather than experientially. While a growing body of evidence-based research provides comprehensive recommendations for inclusive teaching across classroom, programme, and institutional levels, their successful implementation depends on two interdependent and frequently overlooked dimensions: emotionality and relationality. This opinion essay argues that inclusion in EAP cannot be achieved solely through structural reforms or policy commitments; it must be emotionally and relationally grounded. Emotionality recognises the affective realities of teaching and learning, while relationality concerns the human connections that sustain inclusion as a lived experience. These dimensions transform inclusion from a policy to a practice, from a framework to a feeling. Only when educators and institutions attend to the emotional and relational foundations of their work can inclusion move beyond rhetoric to become an embodied commitment to belonging and equity in higher education.

References

Ahmed, S. (2012). On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822395324

Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587

Bakogiannis, E., & Papavasiliou, E. (2025). Exploring inclusive teaching practices of English for Academic Purposes (EAP) in higher education (HE): Recommendations for practice. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 76, 101538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101538

Benesch, S. (2017). Emotions and English language teaching: Exploring teachers’ emotion labor. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315736181

Bingham, C., & Sidorkin, A. M. (Eds.). (2004). No education without relation (Vol. 259, Counterpoints). Peter Lang.

Canagarajah, S. (2012). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203073889

Ferris, D. R. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA: Intersections and

practical applications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 181-201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990490

Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 813-828. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.501096

Gkonou, C., Dewaele, J.-M., & King, J. (Eds.). (2020). The emotional rollercoaster of language teaching. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/GKONOU8335

Hockings, C. (2010). Inclusive learning and teaching in higher education: A synthesis of research. Higher Education

Academy. https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets.creode.advancehe-document-manager/documents/hea/private/inclusive_teaching_and_learning_in_he_synthesis_200410_0_1568037026.pdf

Morgan, B. (2009). Fostering transformative practitioners for critical EAP: Possibilities and challenges. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(2), 86-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.09.001

Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). University of California Press.

Pavlenko, A. (2005). Emotions and multilingualism. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584305

Zembylas, M. (2005). Teaching with emotion: A postmodern enactment. Information Age Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-60752-672-8

Zembylas, M. (2024). Rethinking emotional engagement in human rights education through affective justice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 26(2), 77-93. https://doi.org/10.52214/cice.v26i2.12440

Published

2026-04-02

Issue

Section

Opinion Piece