"It's my life we're talking about": the lived experience in the higher education classroom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56433/w92rv425Keywords:
Lived experience, Disability, Autoethnography, Ableism, Pedagogy, Disclosure, Crip epistemologyAbstract
This article explores the transformative potential and complexities of integrating disability-related lived experience into higher education pedagogy. It contextualizes the concept of lived experience within phenomenological and autoethnographic traditions, highlighting its value in challenging conventional academic norms. Drawing from narratives of academics and students, we illustrate how the inclusion of lived experience can enrich learning, promote inclusivity, and foster a deeper sense of belonging. We reveal the emotional labour, strategic disclosure, and institutional resistance often faced by disabled academics and students navigating ableist structures. Through first-person accounts, we uncover how vulnerability, when embraced, can disrupt rigid pedagogies and catalyse collective transformation. Our major contribution to higher education practice is a set of practical strategies for incorporating lived experience into teaching. We propose these strategies for academics and students to engage ethically and critically with lived experience, advocating for structural change that centres accessibility and embodied knowledge. We conclude with a call to action: to move beyond tokenistic inclusion and toward a systemic reimagining of education that values lived experience as a foundational epistemology. By reframing disability as a vital source of insight, we position lived experience not as supplementary, but as central to fostering an equitable, empathetic, and intellectually vibrant academic community.
References
Adams, T. E., Jones, S. H., & Ellis, C. (2015). Autoethnography: Understanding Qualitative Research. Oxford University Press.
Barnes, C. (2007) 'Disability, higher education and the inclusive society', British Journal of Sociology of Education, 135-145
Boylorn, R. (2008). Lived experience. In: Given, L.M. (ed.). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Vol. 2. SAGE Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909
Brown, N. and Leigh, J. (2018) 'Ableism in academia: Where are the disabled and ill academics?', Disability and Society, 33(6), 985-989.
Brown, N. (2025). Autoethnography: an ethics challenge for researchers and reviewers. In: Busby, H. (ed.). Reframing Qualitative Research Ethics. Emerald, 95-110.
Brune, J. A. and Wilson, D. J. (eds) (2013). Disability and passing: Blurring the lines of identity. 1st edn. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble. Routledge.
Casey, P. J. (2023). Lived Experience: Defined and Critiqued. Critical Horizons, 24(3), 282–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/14409917.2023.2241058
Carel, H. (2016). Phenomenology of illness 1st ed. Oxford University Press.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). ‘Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics’, University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1(8), 139-167.
Dolmage, J. (2017). Academic Ableism: Disability and Higher Education. University of Michigan Press.
Frank, A. W. (2013) The Wounded Storyteller. 2nd ed. The University of Chicago Press.
Garland-Thomson, R. (2005). Disability and the ethics of staring. In: Davis, L.J. (ed.) The Disability Studies Reader. Taylor Francis.
Goodley, D. (2014) Dis/ability studies. Theorising disablism and ableism. Routledge.
Goodley, D., Lawthom, R. Liddiard, K. and Runswick-Cole, K. (2019) ‘Provocations for critical disability studies’, Disability and Society, 34(6), 972-997, https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1566889
Griffiths, E. (2020). ''But you don’t look disabled’ – non-visible disabilities, disclosure and being an ‘insider’ in disability research and ‘other’ in the disability movement and academia', in Brown, N. & Leigh, J. (eds.) Ableism in Academia: Theorising Experiences of Disabilities and Chronic Illnesses in Higher Education. University College London Press, 124-142.
Griffiths, E., Gregersen, E. & Moore, J. (2025). ‘A Place for Us’ – Supporting disabled, dyslexic and neurodivergent students in higher education SEDA Education Developments 26(1), 11-14.
Hamraie, A. (2017). Building Access: Universal Design and the Politics of Disability. University of Minnesota Press.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599.
Hughes, B. & Paterson, K. (1997). ‘The social model of disability and the disappearing body: towards a sociology of impairment’, Disability and Society, 12(3), 325-340.
Hughes, B. (2012). ‘Fear, pity and disgust. Emotions and the non-disabled imaginary’, in Watson, N., Roulstone, A., Thomas, C. (eds.) Handbook of Disability Studies, 1st edn. London, 67-77.
Husserl, E. (1970/1900). Logical Investigations: Volume 1. Prolegomena to Pure Logic. (Findlay, J., transl.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Husserl, E. (2001/1901). Logical Investigations Volume 2. (Moran, D., Dummett, M. & Findlay, J.N., transl. and eds.) Routledge.
Kafer, A. (2013). Feminist, Queer, Crip. Indiana University Press.
Kapp, S. (ed.). (2020). Autistic Community and the Neurodiversity Movement: Stories from the Frontline. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kasnitz, D. (2020). 'The politics of disability performativity: An autoethnography', Current Anthropology, 61(21), 16-25.
Kruks, S. (2014). Women’s ‘lived experience’: feminism and phenomenology from Simone de Beauvoir to the present. The SAGE Handbook of Feminist Theory, 75-92.
Kuppers, P. (2014). Studying Disability Arts and Culture: An Introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.
McIntosh, I., & Wright, S. (2019). Exploring what the notion of ‘lived experience’ offers for social policy analysis. Journal of Social Policy, 48(3), 449-467.
McRuer, R. (2006). Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability. NYU Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge.
Oliver, M. (1990). The Politics of Disablement. Palgrave Macmillan.
Oliver, M. & Barnes, C. (2012). The New Politics of Disablement. Palgrave Macmillan.
Polanyi, M. (1997). The tacit dimension. In: Prusak, L. (ed.). Knowledge in Organisations. Routledge.
Price, M. (2011). Mad at School: Rhetorics of Mental Disability and Academic Life. University of Michigan Press.
Samuels, E. (2017). Fantasies of Identification: Disability, Gender, Race. NYU Press.
Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences. Teachers College Press.
Shakespeare, T. and Watson, N. (2001). The social model of disability: an outdated ideology? In: Exploring Theories and Expanding Methodologies: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go. Series: Research in social science and disability (2). JAI: Amsterdam and New York, 9-28.
Shildrik, M. (2009). Dangerous Discourse of Disability, Subjectivity and Sexuality. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sontag, S. (1978). Illness as Metaphor. Penguin.
Titchkosky, T. (2011). The Question of Access: Disability, Space, Meaning. University of Toronto Press.
Toombs, S. K. (1995). ‘The lived experience of disability’, Human Studies, 18, 9-23.
Walker, N. (2021). Neuroqueer Heresies: Notes on the Neurodiversity Paradigm, Autistic Empowerment, and Postnormal Possibilities. Autonomous Press.
Watson, N. (2002). 'Well, I know this is going to sound very strange to you, but I don't see myself as a disabled person: identity and disability', Disability and Society, 17(5), 509-527.
Yergeau, M. (2018). Authoring Autism: On Rhetoric and Neurological Queerness. Duke University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nicole Brown, Elisabeth Griffiths, Steven Singer, Sorcha Ní Chobhthaigh, Mar Font Calzado, Sofia Lucero Garma Barreto, Hugo Iglesias Munoz, Aiyi Mian, Malvika Murkumbi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.