Demystifying and framing SoTL: Exploring the Meaning and Purpose of Scholarship in a School of Education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56433/20v9y819

Keywords:

professional development, disciplinary boundaries, SoTL, academic identity, institutional culture

Abstract

The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) is central to professional development in higher education, encouraging colleagues to reflect critically on practice and disseminate their insights through publications, conferences, and institutional initiatives. The focus of this paper, the first of two that we propose to JPAAP, serves as an “on-the-horizon” exploration of the concept of scholarship, specifically within a School of Education (SoE). The second paper, which will follow one academic year later, will present an empirical case study examining the culture of SoTL in our School. In this initial paper, we draw on scholarship to frame our discussion around three themes: recognised concepts of SoTL; its positioning within a SoE; and the role of institutional culture in supporting it. Additionally, we will locate the questions above within the context of a SoE and, in doing so, highlight the challenges of establishing a clear and shared understanding of scholarship within the discipline of education. By situating SoTL within the unique disciplinary context of education, we contribute to broader debates about how scholarship is understood and enacted across different parts of the academy. This paper, therefore, lays the conceptual groundwork for a forthcoming case study of how our SoE seeks to demystify SoTL and build a sustainable culture of scholarly support.

References

Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Felten, P. (2013). Principles of good practice in SoTL. Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 1(1), 121–125. https://doi.org/10.2979/teachlearninqu.1.1.121

Fullan, M. (2020). Leading in a culture of change (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Galloway, K., & Jones, P. (2012). The teaching/research nexus: Possibilities and strategies. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2278736

Heifetz, R. A., Linsky, M., & Grashow, A. (2009). The practice of adaptive leadership. Harvard Business Review Press.

Shulman, L. S. (1998). Theory, practice, and the education of professionals. The Elementary School Journal, 98(5), 511–526. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1002328

Smith, S., & Walker, D. (2024). The instrumental academic: Collegiality and the value of academic citizenship in contemporary higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 78(4), Article e12551. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12551.

Thompson, S. (2016). Consultancy in academic development. In D. Baume & C. Popovic (Eds.), Advancing practice in academic development (1st ed., pp. Chapter 5). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315720890 Taylor & Francis.

Trigwell, K., & Shale, S. (2004). Student learning and the scholarship of university teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 29(4), 523–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507042000236407

Downloads

Published

2025-11-05

Issue

Section

On the Horizon