Universal Design for Learning in Private Higher Education: Bridging Inclusion and Innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56433/yz1yg168Keywords:
Universal Design for Learning, Inclusive pedagogy, Private higher education, Educational Leadership, Reflective practiceAbstract
This reflective paper explores the application of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) in private higher education settings, focussing on how inclusive pedagogical methods can foster innovation, engage learners, and ensure educational equity within the institution. Drawing back on personal experiences as a senior educational leader in a private higher education institution, this paper examines how UDL has altered my practice as a leader and educator and impacted strategic decision-making in relation to curriculum design, digital transformation, and staff development, all of which are essential in order to achieve success in an educational institution. The reflective narrative highlights the barriers and opportunities which are linked with private higher education institutions, where the flexibility of policy implementation can aid or deter inclusive practices. Using scholarly literature on UDL, trauma-informed teaching, and inclusive leadership, the reflection connects lived professional experiences with wider institutional change. The aim of this narrative is to contribute to the discourse on inclusive education in under-researched higher education contexts and to offer support and practical insights into how to embed inclusive frameworks in teaching and leadership.
References
Bolton, G., & Delderfield, R. (2018). Reflective practice: Writing and professional development (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Bovill, C. (2020). Co-creation in learning and teaching: The case for a whole-class approach in higher education. Higher Education, 79(6), 1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00453-w
Brunzell, T., Waters, L., & Stokes, H. (2016). Teaching with strength: A strengths-based approach to trauma-informed practice for educators. The International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies, https://doi.org/10.18357/ijcyfs72201615719
Carello, J., & Butler, L. D. (2014). Potentially perilous pedagogies: Teaching trauma is not the same as trauma-informed teaching. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 15(2), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2014.867571
CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. http://udlguidelines.cast.org
Clegg, J., Stackhouse, J., Finch, K., Murphy, C., & Nicholls, S. (2009). Language abilities of secondary age pupils at risk of school exclusion: A preliminary report. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 25(1), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659008098664
Department for Education (DfE). (2015). Special educational needs and disability code of practice: 0 to 25 years. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/send-code-of-practice-0-to-25
Dockrell, J. E., & Lindsay, G. (2001). Children with specific speech and language difficulties—the teachers’ perspective. Oxford Review of Education, 27(3), 369–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980120067410
Dolmage, J. T. (2017). Academic ableism: Disability and higher education. University of Michigan Press.
Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 813–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.501096
Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. Jossey-Bass.
Hammond, Z. (2015). Culturally responsive teaching and the brain: Promoting authentic engagement and rigor among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Corwin Press.
Hehir, T. (2005). New directions in special education: Eliminating ableism in policy and practice. Harvard Education Press.
Law, J., Charlton, J., & Asmussen, K. (2012). Language as a child wellbeing indicator. Early Intervention Foundation. https://www.eif.org.uk/report/language-as-a-child-wellbeing-indicator
Lindsay, G., Dockrell, J., Desforges, M., Law, J., & Peacey, N. (2008). Effective and efficient use of resources in services for children and young people with speech, language and communication needs. Department for Children, Schools and Families. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/id/eprint/8593
Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. Routledge.
Norbury, C. F. (2015). Practitioner review: Social (pragmatic) communication disorder conceptualization, evidence and clinical implications. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56(7), 687–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12154
Novak, K., & Thibodeau, T. (2021). UDL now! A teacher's guide to applying Universal Design for Learning in today's classrooms (2nd ed.). CAST Professional Publishing.
Rao, K., Ok, M. W., & Bryant, B. R. (2014). A review of research on Universal Design Educational Models. Remedial and Special Education, 35(3), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513518980
Rao, K., Edelen-Smith, P., & Wailehua, C. (2016). Universal Design for Online Courses: Applying Principles to Pedagogy. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 31(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2014.991300
Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. ASCD.
Seale, J. (2013). When digital capital is not enough: reconsidering the digital lives of disabled university students. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(3), 256–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2012.670644
Smith, F. (2012). Understanding inclusion: Core concepts, policy and practice. Routledge.
Burgstahler, S. (2015). Universal design in higher education: From principles to practice (2nd ed.). Harvard Education Press.
Loreman, T. (2017). Pedagogy for inclusive education. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.148
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Imran Mir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
