Enhancing student feedback engagement: Implementing and evaluating three inclusive teaching strategies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56433/tejvqc79

Keywords:

Assessment, Feedback, Inclusive assessment, Personalisation

Abstract

This paper documents the implementation of, and student feedback regarding, three teaching strategies to improve student feedback engagement employed over the past two academic years. First, cohort summaries of performance and feedforward in the form of prerecorded videos are released at the beginning of modules to new cohorts and repeatedly reshared, to improve students’ understanding of the assignment. Second, an assignment front sheet has been introduced to encourage a more active and reflective approach to assignments and an increased sense of dialogue with staff. The front sheet offers a diagnostic element before engaging learners with dialogic questions about their experiences of creating the piece of work. Finally, summative assessment feedback is delivered in audio form with the aim of encouraging better engagement and to create a more personalised culture. These strategies have been employed in four modules across two academic years, offering students feedback in inclusive ways to encourage a more active learning and student engagement with summative and formative feedback. Student survey and focus group data will be presented and discussed, sharing experiences of the above measures and reveals a broadly positive student experience. Cohort summary videos were found to sharpen student focus. Assignment front sheets were used as checklists or maps of the assessments, but also used to annotate or justify risk-taking or creativity. Finally, students reported that they largely enjoyed audio feedback, that it gave a more ‘human’ form of feedback, but that for some, particularly students with learning disabilities and differences, it could be challenging. The paper will discuss the above findings and provide lessons learnt and recommendations for other practitioners considering implementing similar strategies in their practice.

Author Biographies

  • Christopher Little

    Dr Chris Little is a Senior Lecturer in Academic Development in Manchester Metropolitan University’s central University Teaching Academy. Chris offers academic development consultancy at Manchester Metropolitan and co-leads the university Advance He Recognition provision.

  • Carmel Thomason, Manchester Metropolitan University

    Dr Carmel Thomason is a Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Journalism in Manchester Metropolitan University’s School of English where she co-leads the BA Hons Multimedia Journalism programme.

References

Arts, J.G., Jaspers, M. & Joosten-ten Brinke, D. (2021). Enhancing written feedback: The use of a cover sheet influences feedback quality. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1901641. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1901641

Bloxham, S. and Campbell, L. (2010). Generating dialogue in assessment feedback: Exploring the use of interactive cover sheets. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 291-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003650045

Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), pp.77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

British Educational Research Association. (2018). Ethical guidelines for education research, fourth edition. https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018

Brown, N., Morea-Ghergu, D. & Onwuka, N. (2020). Assessments: letting students decide. In S. Mawani & A. Mukadam (Eds.), Student Empowerment in Higher Education: Reflecting on Teaching Practice and Learner Engagement Vol 2 (pp.487-498). Logos Verlag.

Campbell, P., & Duke, B. (2023). An Evaluation of the Racially Inclusive Practice in Assessment Guidance Intervention on Students’ and Staffs’ Experiences of Assessment in HE: A Multi-University Case Study (Version 1). University of Leicester. https://doi.org/10.25392/leicester.data.23579565.v1

Dawson, P., Henderson, M., Mahoney, P., Phillips, M., Ryan, T., Boud, D. & Molloy, E. (2019). What makes for effective feedback: staff and student perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), pp.25-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1467877

Dil, N., Castiglioni, A., Kim, K., Aravind, N., & Torre, D. (2024). Use and implementation of focus groups. Medical Teacher, 46(3), 317–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2304451

Fink, A. (2003). The Survey Handbook. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications.

Hansen, K., & Świderska, A. (2024). Integrating open-and closed-ended questions on attitudes towards outgroups with different methods of text analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 56(5), 4802-4822. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02218-x

Harris, R., Blundell-Birtill, P. & Pownall, M., (2022). Development and evaluation of two interventions to improve students’ reflection on feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2107999

Hounsell, D., McCune, V., Hounsell, J & Litjens, J. (2008). The quality of guidance and feedback to students, Higher Education Research & Development, 27(1), 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701658765

Information Commissioner’s Office. (2012). Anonymisation: Managing data protection risk, Code of Practice. Information Commissioner’s Office. https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisations/documents/1061/anonymisation-code.pdf

Kirwan, A., Raftery, S., & Gormley, C. (2023). Sounds good to me: A qualitative study to explore the use of audio to potentiate the student feedback experience. Journal of Professional Nursing, 47, 25-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.03.020

Knauf, H., (2016). Reading, listening and feeling: audio feedback as a component of an inclusive learning culture at universities. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 442-449. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1021664

Pitt, E. & Quinlan, K.M. (2022). Impacts of higher education assessment and feedback policy and practice on students: A review of the literature 2016-2021. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/impacts-higher-education-assessment-and-feedback-policy-and-practice-students-review

Porter, S. R. & Whitcomb. M.E. (2003). The Impact of Contact Type on Web Survey Response Rates. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 67(4), 579–588. doi.org/10.1086/378964.

Reimann, N., Sadler, I., & Sambell, K. (2019). What’s in a word? Practices associated with ‘feedforward’ in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), 1279–1290. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1600655

Sadler, I., Reimann, N., & Sambell, K. (2022). Feedforward practices: a systematic review of the literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(3), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2073434

Stalmeijer, R. E., McNaughton, N., & Van Mook, W. N. K. A. (2014). Using focus groups in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 91. Medical Teacher, 36(11), 923–939. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.917165

Turnbull, A., (2022). Feeling feedback: screencasting assessment feedback for tutor and student well-being. In E. Jones & C. Strevens (Eds.), Legal Education for Wellbeing (pp. 105-118). Routledge.

Wanner, T., Palmer, E., & Palmer, D. (2024). Flexible assessment and student empowerment: Advantages and disadvantages–research from an Australian university. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(2), 349-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1989578

Winstone, N.E. (2022). Characterising feedback cultures in higher education: an analysis of strategy documents from 134 UK universities. Higher Education, 84, 1107-1125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00818-8

Downloads

Published

2025-11-05

Issue

Section

Case Studies