Enhancing student feedback engagement: Implementing and evaluating three inclusive teaching strategies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56433/tejvqc79Keywords:
Assessment, Feedback, Inclusive assessment, PersonalisationAbstract
This paper documents the implementation of, and student feedback regarding, three teaching strategies to improve student feedback engagement employed over the past two academic years. First, cohort summaries of performance and feedforward in the form of prerecorded videos are released at the beginning of modules to new cohorts and repeatedly reshared, to improve students’ understanding of the assignment. Second, an assignment front sheet has been introduced to encourage a more active and reflective approach to assignments and an increased sense of dialogue with staff. The front sheet offers a diagnostic element before engaging learners with dialogic questions about their experiences of creating the piece of work. Finally, summative assessment feedback is delivered in audio form with the aim of encouraging better engagement and to create a more personalised culture. These strategies have been employed in four modules across two academic years, offering students feedback in inclusive ways to encourage a more active learning and student engagement with summative and formative feedback. Student survey and focus group data will be presented and discussed, sharing experiences of the above measures and reveals a broadly positive student experience. Cohort summary videos were found to sharpen student focus. Assignment front sheets were used as checklists or maps of the assessments, but also used to annotate or justify risk-taking or creativity. Finally, students reported that they largely enjoyed audio feedback, that it gave a more ‘human’ form of feedback, but that for some, particularly students with learning disabilities and differences, it could be challenging. The paper will discuss the above findings and provide lessons learnt and recommendations for other practitioners considering implementing similar strategies in their practice.
References
Arts, J.G., Jaspers, M. & Joosten-ten Brinke, D. (2021). Enhancing written feedback: The use of a cover sheet influences feedback quality. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1901641. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1901641
Bloxham, S. and Campbell, L. (2010). Generating dialogue in assessment feedback: Exploring the use of interactive cover sheets. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 291-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003650045
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), pp.77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
British Educational Research Association. (2018). Ethical guidelines for education research, fourth edition. https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018
Brown, N., Morea-Ghergu, D. & Onwuka, N. (2020). Assessments: letting students decide. In S. Mawani & A. Mukadam (Eds.), Student Empowerment in Higher Education: Reflecting on Teaching Practice and Learner Engagement Vol 2 (pp.487-498). Logos Verlag.
Campbell, P., & Duke, B. (2023). An Evaluation of the Racially Inclusive Practice in Assessment Guidance Intervention on Students’ and Staffs’ Experiences of Assessment in HE: A Multi-University Case Study (Version 1). University of Leicester. https://doi.org/10.25392/leicester.data.23579565.v1
Dawson, P., Henderson, M., Mahoney, P., Phillips, M., Ryan, T., Boud, D. & Molloy, E. (2019). What makes for effective feedback: staff and student perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), pp.25-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1467877
Dil, N., Castiglioni, A., Kim, K., Aravind, N., & Torre, D. (2024). Use and implementation of focus groups. Medical Teacher, 46(3), 317–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2304451
Fink, A. (2003). The Survey Handbook. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications.
Hansen, K., & Świderska, A. (2024). Integrating open-and closed-ended questions on attitudes towards outgroups with different methods of text analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 56(5), 4802-4822. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02218-x
Harris, R., Blundell-Birtill, P. & Pownall, M., (2022). Development and evaluation of two interventions to improve students’ reflection on feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2107999
Hounsell, D., McCune, V., Hounsell, J & Litjens, J. (2008). The quality of guidance and feedback to students, Higher Education Research & Development, 27(1), 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701658765
Information Commissioner’s Office. (2012). Anonymisation: Managing data protection risk, Code of Practice. Information Commissioner’s Office. https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisations/documents/1061/anonymisation-code.pdf
Kirwan, A., Raftery, S., & Gormley, C. (2023). Sounds good to me: A qualitative study to explore the use of audio to potentiate the student feedback experience. Journal of Professional Nursing, 47, 25-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.03.020
Knauf, H., (2016). Reading, listening and feeling: audio feedback as a component of an inclusive learning culture at universities. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 442-449. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1021664
Pitt, E. & Quinlan, K.M. (2022). Impacts of higher education assessment and feedback policy and practice on students: A review of the literature 2016-2021. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/impacts-higher-education-assessment-and-feedback-policy-and-practice-students-review
Porter, S. R. & Whitcomb. M.E. (2003). The Impact of Contact Type on Web Survey Response Rates. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 67(4), 579–588. doi.org/10.1086/378964.
Reimann, N., Sadler, I., & Sambell, K. (2019). What’s in a word? Practices associated with ‘feedforward’ in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), 1279–1290. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1600655
Sadler, I., Reimann, N., & Sambell, K. (2022). Feedforward practices: a systematic review of the literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(3), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2073434
Stalmeijer, R. E., McNaughton, N., & Van Mook, W. N. K. A. (2014). Using focus groups in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 91. Medical Teacher, 36(11), 923–939. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.917165
Turnbull, A., (2022). Feeling feedback: screencasting assessment feedback for tutor and student well-being. In E. Jones & C. Strevens (Eds.), Legal Education for Wellbeing (pp. 105-118). Routledge.
Wanner, T., Palmer, E., & Palmer, D. (2024). Flexible assessment and student empowerment: Advantages and disadvantages–research from an Australian university. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(2), 349-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1989578
Winstone, N.E. (2022). Characterising feedback cultures in higher education: an analysis of strategy documents from 134 UK universities. Higher Education, 84, 1107-1125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00818-8
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Christopher Little, Carmel Thomason

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.