Purposeful Pedagogy in Action: The Transition Attributes Framework

Authors

  • Russell Crawford

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56433/nh4pjz84

Keywords:

Transitions, graduate attributes, curriculum, framework

Abstract

The Transition Attributes (TA) framework is a novel evaluative pedagogic tool which allows mapping of transition activities across four core attributes (skills, knowledge, mindsets and habits) and twelve sub-attributes which are linked to established higher education sector graduate attributes literature and measures of student success in higher study. This short paper outlines the basis of the TA framework, the rationale for each sub-attributes and outlines how the TA framework could be applied via an exemplar analysis to illustrate its potential to aid in gap analysis, assurance and advanced planning around suites of activities intended to support learners transition in any context.

References

Aranda, L., Mena-Rodríguez, E., & Rubio, L. (2022). Basic skills in higher education: An analysis of attributed importance. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 752248.

Cage, E., Jones, E., Ryan, G., Hughes, G., & Spanner, L. (2021). Student mental health and transitions into, through and out of university: student and staff perspectives. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(8), 1076–1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1875203

Cifuentes Gomez, G., Guzmán, P., & Santelices, M. V. (2022). Transitioning to higher education: students’ expectations and realities. Educational Research, 64(4), 424–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2022.2087712

De Vos, A., Jacobs, S., & Verbruggen, M. (2021). Career transitions and employability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 126, 103475.

Donna Poade, & Russell M. Crawford. (2024). Trickle or Torrent? A Novel Algorithmic Approach to Reclaim Successful Academic Writing in the Face of Artificial Intelligence. Brock Education Journal, 33(1), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.26522/brocked.v33i1.1127

Dweck, C. S. (2024). Personal perspectives on mindsets, motivation, and psychology. Motivation Science, 10(1), 1.

Edgerley, R. & Crawford, R. (2025) “LEGO, fishbowls, and collaboration”, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, (33). doi: 10.47408/jldhe.vi33.1219.

Meyer, J. H., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher education, 49, 373-388.

Wong, B., Chiu, Y. L. T., Copsey-Blake, M., & Nikolopoulou, M. (2022). A mapping of graduate attributes: What can we expect from UK university students?. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(4), 1340-1355.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-02