Is Feedback a Waste of Time? The Students’ Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v1i2.69Keywords:
Tutor Feedback, Feedback Perceptions, Student Response, Guidance on FeedbackAbstract
While it is commonly recognised that tutor feedback is central to student learning, a number of scholars and practitioners in higher education hold that tutor feedback is a waste of time because students are only interested in grades. Based on the results of a survey on 206 students at Aston University, this study finds that students are receptive to tutor feedback and act on it. It also discovers that the quality of tutor feedback and the guidance on how to use tutor feedback students have received significantly encourages them to act on it and enhances their learning in general. These findings have two significant implications. First, instead of assuming that students are indifferent to their feedback and, consequently, failing to give them sufficient feedback, tutors should take time and make the effort to offer them useful feedback. Second, to increase student reactions to their feedback, they should give students advice on how to use it.
References
Adcroft, A. (2011). The mythology of feedback. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(4), 405-419.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.526096
Aston University. (2009-2010). Policy on Giving Effective Feedback on Assessed Work. Retrieved from http://www1.aston.ac.uk/registry/for-staff/regsandpolicies/feedbackpolicy/
Bailey, R. & Garner, M. (2010). Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers’ reflections on their practices. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 187-198.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562511003620019
Burke, D. & Pieterick, J. (2010). Giving Students Effective Written Feedback. Maidenhead, Berks: Open University Press.
Cargan, L. (2007). Doing Social Research. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219-233.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572132
Carless, D. (2007). Learning-oriented assessment: Conceptual bases and practical implications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(1), 57-66.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14703290601081332
Cartney, P. (2010). Exploring the use of peer assessment as a vehicle for closing the gap between feedback given and feedback used. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 551-564.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602931003632381
Chanock, K. (2000). Comments on essays: Do students understand what tutors write? Teaching in Higher Education, 5(1) 95-105.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/135625100114984
Crisp, B. R. (2007). Is it worth the effort? How feedback influences students’ subsequent submission of assessable work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(5), 571-581.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930601116912
Denscombe, M. (2007). The Good Research Guide: for Small-Scale Social Research. Maidenhead, Berks: Open University Press.
Ding, L. (1998). Revisiting assessment and learning: implications of students’ perspectives on assessment feedback. Paper presented to Scottish Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Dundee, 25-26 September.
Dowden, T., Pittaway, S., Yost, H., & McCarthy, R. (2011). Students’ perceptions of written feedback in teacher education: Ideally feedback is a continuing two-way communication that encourages progress. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1(4), 1-14.
Duncan, N. (2007). ‘Feed-forward’: Improving students’ use of tutors’ comments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(3), 271-283.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930600896498
Ecclestone, K. (1998). ‘Just tell me what to do’ barriers to assessment-in-learning in higher education. Paper presented to Scottish Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Dundee, 25-26 September.
Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., Bjork, R. A., Gelman, R., & Wickens, T. D. (2000). When further learning fails: stability and change following repeated presentation of text. British Journal of Psychology, 91(4), 493-511.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000712600161952
Gibbs, J. & Simpson, C. (2004-2005). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3-31.
Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills intervention on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 99-136.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543066002099
Hattie, J. & Jaeger, R. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning: A deductive approach. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 111-122.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050107
Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Higgins, R. (2000). ‘Be more critical!’: Rethinking assessment feedback. Paper presented to British Educational Research Association Conference, Cardiff University, 7-10 September.
Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2001). Getting the message across: The problem of communicating assessment feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 269-274.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562510120045230
Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2002). The conscientious consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 53-64.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070120099368
Hounsell, D. (2003). Student feedback, learning and development. In M. Slowey & D. Watson (Eds.), Higher Education and the Lifecourse (pp. 67-78). Maidenhead, Berks: Open University Press.
Hounsell, D., McCune, V., Hounsell, J., & Litjens, J. (2008). The quality of guidance and feedback to students. Higher Education Research & Development, 27(1), 55-67.
Irons, A. (2008). Enhancing Learning through Formative Assessment and Feedback. New York: Routledge.
Juwah, C., Macfarlane-Dick, D., Matthew, B., Nicol, D., Ross, D., & Smith, B. (2004). Enhancing Student Learning through Effective Formative Feedback. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/resources/resourcedatabase/id353_senlef_guide.pdf
Lea, M. R. & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157-172.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364
Lea, M. R. & Street, B. V. (2000). Student Writing and Staff Feedback: An Academic Literacies Approach. In M. R. Lea & B. Stierer (Eds.), Student Writing in Higher Education: New Contexts (pp. 32-46). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Lizzio, A. & Wilson, K. (2008). Feedback on assessment: Students’ perceptions of quality and effectiveness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 263-275.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930701292548
Mutch, A. (2003). Exploring the practice of feedback to students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 4(1), 24-38.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1469787403004001003
Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501-517.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602931003786559
Orrell, J. (2006). Feedback on learning achievement: Rhetoric and reality. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(4), 441-456.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562510600874235
Orsmond, P., Maw, S. J., Park, J. R., Gomez, S., & Crook, A. C. (2013). Moving feedback forward: Theory to practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(2), 240-252.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.625472
Orsmond, P. & Merry, S. (2011). Feedback alignment: Effective and ineffective links between tutors’ and students’ understanding of coursework feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(2), 125-136.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930903201651
Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (2005). Biology students’ utilization of tutors’ formative feedback: A qualitative interview study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 369-386.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930500099177
Poulos, A. & Mahony, M. J. (2008). Effectiveness of feedback: The students’ perspective’. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 143-154.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930601127869
Price, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J. (2011). Feedback: Focusing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 36(8), 879-896.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.483513
Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277-289.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541007
Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) (2006). Code of Practice for the Assurance of Academic Quality and Standards in Higher Education, Section 6: Assessment of Students. Retrieved from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/Publications/InformationAndGuidance/Documents/COP_AOS.pdf
Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) (2011). Understanding Assessment: Its Role in Safeguarding Academic Standards and Quality in Higher Education: A Guide for Early Career Staff. Retrieved from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/Publications/InformationAndGuidance/Documents/UnderstandingAssessment.pdf
Race, P. (2007). The Lecturer’s Toolkit: A Practical Guide to Assessment, Learning and Teaching, 3rd ed. London and New York: Routledge.
Robinson, S., Pope, D., & Holyoak, L. (2013). Can we meet their expectations? Experiences and perceptions of feedback in first year undergraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(3), 260-272.
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
Smith, E. & Gorard, S. (2005). They don’t give us our marks: The role of formative feedback in student progress. Assessment in Education, 12(1), 21-38.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969594042000333896
Weaver, M. R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 379-394.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930500353061
Wojtas, O. (1998, 25 September). Feedback? No, just give us the answers. Times Higher Education Supplement.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
