Open Research as an Ally to Teaching and Scholarship-Track Academics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56433/dxhss233Keywords:
open research, scholarship, pedagogical research, teachingAbstract
‘Open research’ broadly aims to enhance the openness, transparency, and robustness of research across disciplines. While existing efforts have largely focused on improving the quality of research outputs, we argue that certain open research tools can also offer strategic benefits for Teaching and Scholarship (T&S) academics who engage primarily in educational or pedagogical research. Given the challenges in conducting high-quality pedagogical research, the adoption of open research tools may support T&S academics, by increasing research visibility, informing and refining methodological decision-making, and enhancing the efficacy and impact of pedagogical research. In this paper, we outline three key open research tools that may strategically benefit T&S academics: (1) preprints, (2) registered reports, and (3) sharing open educational resources. For each tool, we provide an overview, discuss how T&S academics can integrate them to improve their practice, and offer illustrative case studies. This discussion draws on the conceptualisation of high-quality pedagogical research outlined by Evans et al. (2021). We end with a call to researchers to align open research efforts with pedagogical scholarship, which will, in turn, improve pedagogical practice.
References
Adil, H.M., Ali, S., Sultan, M., Ashiq, M. and Rafiq, M. (2024), "Open education resources' benefits and challenges in the academic world: a systematic review", Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, Vol. 73 No. 3, pp. 274-291. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-02-2022-0049
Booher, L., Nadelson, L. S., & Nadelson, S. G. (2020). What about research and evidence? Teachers’ perceptions and uses of education research to inform STEM teaching. The Journal of Educational Research, 113(3), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2020.1782811
Bull, S., Cooper, A., Laidlaw, A., Milne, L., & Parr, S. (2024). 'You certainly don't get promoted for just teaching': experiences of education-focused academics in research-intensive universities. Studies in Higher Education, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2333946
Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports. A new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609-610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016
Evans, C., Howson, C. K., Forsythe, A., & Edwards, C. (2021). What constitutes high quality higher education pedagogical research? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(4), 525-546. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1790500
Flake, J. K. (2021). Strengthening the foundation of educational psychology by integrating construct validation into open science reform. Educational Psychologist, 56(2), 132-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1898962
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000959
Fu, D. Y., & Hughey, J. J. (2019). Releasing a preprint is associated with more attention and citations for the peer-reviewed article. Elife, 8, e52646. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52646.sa2
Gernsbacher, M. A., Soicher, R. N., & Becker-Blease, K. A. (2020). Four empirically based reasons not to administer time-limited tests. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 6(2), 175-190. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000232
Gernsbacher, M. A., Soicher, R. N., & Becker-Blease, K. A. (2021, February 21). Arguments Against Time-Limited Educational Testing. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/9MD6B
Huang, C., Neylon, C., Montgomery, L., Hosking, R., Diprose, J. P., Handcock, R. N., & Wilson, K. (2024). Open access research outputs receive more diverse citations. Scientometrics, 129(2), 825-845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04894-0
McAleer, P., & Paterson, H. M. (2021). Improving pedagogy through Registered Reports. Open Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.56230/osotl.13
Moshontz, H., Binion, G., Walton, H., Brown, B. T., & Syed, M. (2021). A guide to posting and managing preprints. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(2), 251524592110199. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211019948
Nguyen, V. M., Haddaway, N. R., Gutowsky, L. F. G., Wilson, A. D. M., Gallagher, A. J., Donaldson, M. R., Hammerschlag, N., & Cooke, S. J. (2015). How Long Is Too Long in Contemporary Peer Review? Perspectives from Authors Publishing in Conservation Biology Journals. PLoS ONE, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132557
Nordmann, E., Horlin, C., Hutchison, J., Murray, J. A., Robson, L., Seery, M. K., & MacKay, J. R. (2020). Ten simple rules for supporting a temporary online pivot in higher education. PLoS Computational Biology, 16(10), e1008242. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008242
Open Educational Resources. (nd). https://oercommons.org/about
Pownall, M., Azevedo, F., Aldoh, A., Elsherif, M., Vasilev, M., Pennington, C. R., Robertson, O., Tromp, M. V., Liu, M., Makel, M. C., Tonge, N., Moreau, D., Horry, R., Shaw, J., Tzavella, L., McGarrigle, R., Talbot, C., Parsons, S., & FORRT. (2024). Embedding open and reproducible science into teaching: A bank of lesson plans and resources. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 10(3), 342-349. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000307
Pownall, M., Pennington, C. R., Norris, E., Juanchich, M., Smailes, D., Russell, S., ... & Clark, K. (2023). Evaluating the pedagogical effectiveness of study preregistration in the undergraduate dissertation. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231202724
PsyTeachR. (2024). PsyTeachR. https://psyteachr.github.io/
Reich, J., Gehlbach, H., & Albers, C. J. (2020). "Like upgrading from a typewriter to a computer": Registered reports in education research. AERA Open, 6(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420917640
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Madeleine Pownall, Raechel N. Soicher, Emily Nordmann
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
