From the Margins to the Core: Implementing an Inclusive Academic Community for Empowered Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56433/nn8f0y86Keywords:
Third space, academic literacies, inclusive learning, Academic Development, student agency, collaborative provisionAbstract
In higher education (HE), academic development and in-sessional provision have traditionally existed at the margins, often treated as supplementary rather than integral to institutional priorities. However, as student demographics and academic demands evolve, the need for a more inclusive, integrated approach to student support becomes increasingly pressing. This reflective analysis explores the collaboration between two services situated within the third space (Whitchurch, 2008): academic skills provision offered by the Centre for Educational Enhancement and Development (CEED) and Academic English Services (AES) provided by the International Education Institute (IE). Through this partnership, we sought to challenge entrenched othering structures that distinguish international from home students and reinforce the problematic dichotomy between native and non-native English speakers. Drawing from practitioner-based enquiry, we outline the steps taken to integrate these services and develop a student-centred provision that fosters autonomy and inclusivity. Our approach intentionally moves beyond problematising existing labels, instead focusing on dismantling institutional barriers that have historically segregated academic and language support. By aligning pedagogical and operational strategies, we created a unified framework that allows all learners to access tailored support without being restricted by linguistic or institutional classifications. This reflective analysis critically examines the early stages of our collaboration, drawing from qualitative and quantitative data to evaluate its impact. We unpick the successes and challenges encountered in navigating institutional constraints, streamlining service provision, and fostering a more cohesive academic community. Our findings contribute to ongoing discussions on cross-departmental collaborations and provide a potential blueprint for integrating academic and language development within the third space. Ultimately, we advocate for a model that prioritises learner agency, challenges deficit-based perspectives, and repositions academic development as a core function within HE institutions.
References
Braun, V., and Clarke, V. (2016). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297– 298. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
Chapman, T., and Tibbets, N. (2023). A guide to in-sessional English for academic purposes paradigms and practices. Routledge.
Ding, A., & Bruce, I. (2017). The English for academic purposes practitioner: operating on the edge of academia. Springer International Publishing.
Driscoll, J. (2007) Practising clinical supervision: a reflective approach for healthcare professionals. 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Bailliere Tindall Elsevier
Eddy, L. P. (2010). Partnerships and collaborations in higher education. John Wiley & Sons.
Fisher, B.M. (2001). No angel in the classroom : teaching through feminist discourse. Rowman And Littlefield.
Harris, E. and Villegas, P. (2024). Breaking down barriers: creating a community of learning development at the University of St Andrews. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education Special Issue 32: ALDinHE Conference Proceedings
Hakim, A., and Wingate, U. (2024). Collaborative approaches to embedding academic literacy instruction in the curriculum: examples from UK universities. Studies in Higher Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2397695
Heffernan, T. (2022). Sexism, racism, prejudice, and bias: a literature review and synthesis of research surrounding student evaluations of courses and teaching, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(1), 144-154, https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1888075
hooks, B. (2014). Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315743172
Hyland, K. (2011). Disciplines and discourses: social interactions in the construction of knowledge. In: Writing in Knowledge Societies. West Lafayette, IN, U.S.A.: Parlor Press and the WAC Clearinghouse, pp. 193–214.
Lakeman, R., Coutts, R., Hutchinson, M., Lee, M., Massey, D., Dima Nasrawi, D., and Fielden, J. (2022). Appearance, insults, allegations, blame and threats: an analysis of anonymous non-constructive student evaluation of teaching in Australia, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(8), 1245–1258, https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2012643
Murray, N. (2016). An academic literacies argument for decentralising EAP provision. ELT Journal, 70(4), 435–443. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw030
Nilson, L. B., and Goodson, L. A. (2018). Online Teaching at Its Best: A Merger of Instructional Design with Teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
Pham, H. T., and Tanner, K. (2015). Collaboration between academics and library staff: A structurationist perspective. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 46(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2014.989661
Turner, J. (2004) Language as academic purpose. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(2), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00054-7
Turner, J. (2011): . Language in the Academy: Cultural reflexivity and intercultural dynamics. Multilingual Matters.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Veles, N. (2022). Optimising the Third Space in Higher Education. Taylor & Francis.
Wingate, U. (2015). Academic literacy and student diversity: The case for inclusive practice. Multilingual Matters.
Whitchurch, C. (2018). Being a higher education professional today: Working in a third space. In C. Bossu and N. Brown (Eds.), Professional and support staff in higher education (11–22). Springer.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Paula Villegas, Dr Eilidh Harris
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
