Development of a Context-based Formative Feedback Practice Framework: A Higher Education Action Research Project
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56433/pk7j4f25Keywords:
formative assessment, higher education, Action Research, student perceptions, framework developmentAbstract
Formative Assessment (FA) in Higher Education (HE) is a complex and contested process with various definitions, ranging from the nebulous to the highly specific. This has made the practical task of enhancing FA processes in undergraduate courses challenging. This paper reports on an Action Research (AR) project that sought to understand and develop FA practices within an HE Institute of Education. Emphasis was placed on student experiences and perceptions, as well as the importance of considering learner opinions as a valid source of knowledge generation.
The starting point for the project was a theoretical exploration of the concept of FA, which highlighted the different interpretations within the literature. It also revealed the potential challenges surrounding its practical implementation, particularly the divergences between students and lecturers regarding its purpose and goals. Following an iterative AR process, the project used this starting point to develop project goals and ethos, collect and analyse data to audit existing FA practices, and design and apply a framework for evaluating and evolving these practices. The framework also drew substantially on critical research on FA in HE published by Advance HE, representing a real-world application of this work. The paper concludes by reviewing the benefits and limitations of the AR project and offering proposals for further actions.
References
Advance HE. (2019). Essential frameworks for enhancing student success: Transforming assessment in higher education. Retrieved from https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2020-05/Transforming%20Assessment%20in%20Higher%20Education%20Framework.pdf
Arnold, L., & Norton, L. (2018). HEA action research: Practice guide. Higher Education Academy, 307–322.
Atkins, M. J. (1993). Assessment issues in higher education. Newcastle upon Tyne Polytechnic.
Barnett, R. (2007). Assessment in higher education: An impossible mission? In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education (pp. 39–50). Routledge.
Clark, I. (2014). Equitable learning outcomes: Supporting economically and culturally disadvantaged students in ‘formative learning environments.’ Improving Schools, 17(1), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480213519182
Efron, S. E., & Ravid, R. (2019). Action research in education: A practical guide. Guilford Publications.
Ejaz, N., Alam, A., & Alam, T. (2022). Practicing formative assessment for betterment: A content analysis. Research Journal of Social Sciences and Economics Review, 3(3), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.36902/rjsser-vol3-iss3-2022(50-57)
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Fook, C. Y., & Sidhu, G. K. (2013). Promoting transformative learning through formative assessment in higher education. AJTLHE: ASEAN Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 5(1), 1–11.
Grimalt-Álvaro, C., & Usart, M. (2023). Sentiment analysis for formative assessment in higher education: A systematic literature review. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 36(4), 647–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09370-5
Kaya-Capocci, S., O’Leary, M., & Costello, E. (2022). Towards a framework to support the implementation of digital formative assessment in higher education. Education Sciences, 12(11), 823. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110823
Koka, R., Jurāne-Brēmane, A., & Koķe, T. (2017). Formative assessment in higher education: From theory to practice. European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 4(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v8i1.p28-34
Koka, R., Jurāne-Brēmane, A., & Koķe, T. (2023). Formative assessment in higher education: From theory to practice. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research, 10(4), 79–82. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v9i1.p28-34
Kruiper, S. M. A., Leenknecht, M. J. M., & Slof, B. (2022). Using scaffolding strategies to improve formative assessment practice in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(3), 458–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1927981
Lau, A. M. S. (2016). ‘Formative good, summative bad?’–A review of the dichotomy in assessment literature. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(4), 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2014.984600
López-Pastor, V., & Sicilia-Camacho, A. (2017). Formative and shared assessment in higher education: Lessons learned and challenges for the future. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1083535
Morris, R., Perry, T., & Wardle, L. (2021). Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Education, 9(3), e3292. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3292
Mohamad Hanefar, S. B., Zerin Anny, N., & Sajedur Rahman, M. (2022). Enhancing teaching and learning in higher education through formative assessment: Teachers’ perceptions. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.946517
Pitt, E., & Quinlan, K. M. (2022). Impacts of higher education assessment and feedback policy and practice on students: A review of the literature 2016–2021. Advance HE.
Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagné, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (Vol. 1, pp. 39–83). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
Stringer, E. T. (2008). Action research in education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Taras, M. (2005). Assessment–Summative and formative–Some theoretical reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(4), 466–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00307.x
Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (1998). Investigating formative assessment: Teaching, learning and assessment in the classroom. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Wheatley, L., Lord, R., McInch, A., & Fleming, S. (2015). Feeding back to feed forward: Formative assessment as a platform for more effective learning. Kentucky Journal of Higher Education Policy and Practice, 3(2), 1–29.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Alexandra Louise Sewell
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
