The Trials and Triumphs of Running Cross-Year Experiential Modules: Blending Theory and Practice to Advance Student Professional Development and Academic Practice.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56433/jpaap.v11i3.590Keywords:
Experiential Learning, Peer-led collaborative learning, Digital marketing education, Professional development, Advancement of academic practiceAbstract
This paper aims to evaluate the impact of two innovative cross-year experiential modules operated jointly between undergraduate Stages 3 and 4 on the professional development of students and the advancement of academic practice at Robert Gordon University in Scotland. Drawing upon pedagogy, including active and experiential learning and qualitative data collected from Stage 3 and 4 student focus groups and academic staff interviews, this paper aims to analyse the opportunities and challenges presented by cross-year experiential modules in relation to student engagement and professional development, and lessons learnt with implications on academic practice. These modules, designed to simulate a real-world Digital Marketing Agency, are a distinctive part of the BA (Hons) Digital Marketing course. They provide collaborative learning problem-solving opportunities through cross-year group work involving Stage 4 students taking on leadership roles in strategic planning over Stage 3 students, in operational roles, who develop related campaign materials in response to the requirements of live clients. This is reflected in the application of two distinct sets of criteria to assess the students’ coursework in accordance with stage-specific learning outcomes. Each group is supported by an academic and industry mentor for the duration of the modules.
References
Ajjawi, R., Tai, J., Huu Nghia, T. L., Boud, D., Johnson, L., & Patrick, C.-J. (2020). Aligning assessment with the needs of work-integrated learning: The challenges of authentic assessment in a complex context. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 304–316. https://doi-org.ezproxy.rgu.ac.uk/10.1080/02602938.2019.1639613
Blumenfeld, P., Kempler, T., & Krajcik, J. (2006). Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning environments. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 475 – 488). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.029
Bryman, A., Clark, T., Foster, & L., Sloan, L., (2021). Social research methods (6th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Connon, N., & Pirie, E. (2022). Home-based learning (HBL) in higher education post COVID: an analysis from staff and student perspectives. Journal of Innovation in Polytechnic Education, 4(1), 45-50. https://jipe.ca/index.php/jipe/article/view/107/51
Creswell. J.W. & Creswell, J.D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (5th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Crittenden V., & Crittenden W. (2015). Digital and social media marketing in business education: Implications for the marketing curriculum. Journal of Marketing Education, 37(2), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475315588111
Elias, N. (1939). The civilizing process: Sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations. Blackwell Publishing.
Elias, N. (1956). Problems of involvement and detachment. The British Journal of Sociology, 7(3), 226-252. https://doi.org/10.2307/587994
Elias, N. (1987). Involvement and detachment. Blackwell Publishing.
Ewing, D. R., & Ewing, R. L. (2017). Leveraging experiential learning to encourage role transition from “student” to “professional”: Insights from identity theory. Journal of Marketing Education, 39(3), 132-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475317724844
Ferrell, O. C., & Ferrell, L. (2020). Technology challenges and opportunities facing marketing education. Marketing Education Review, 30(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2020.1718510
Finch, D., Nadeau, J., & O’Reilly, N. (2013). The future of marketing education: A practitioner’s perspective. Journal of Marketing Education, 35(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475312465091
Goldie, K., Ironside, R., & Pirie, E. (2023). “It feels real”: Events management and online experiential learning in Covid-19. Distance Education, 44(2), 230-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2023.2198490
Heinrich, W. F., Louson, E., Blommel, C., & Green, A. R. (2021). Who coaches the coaches? The development of a coaching model for experiential learning. Innovative Higher Education, 46(3), 357–375. https://doi-org.ezproxy.rgu.ac.uk/10.1007/s10755-020-09537-3
Honigman, J. J. (1982). Sampling in Ethnographic Fieldwork. In R. G. Burgess (Ed.), Field research: A source book and field manual. Routledge London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203379998
Hum, L., Maccaro, J., & Park, S. E. (2014). Cross-year peer tutoring in healthcare and dental education: A review of the literature. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 3(2), 43–57. http://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v3n2p43
Jarvela, S., Volet, S., & Jarvenoja, H. (2010). Research on motivation in collaborative learning: Moving beyond the cognitive-situative divide and combining individual and social processes. Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 15–27. https://doi-org.ezproxy.rgu.ac.uk/10.1080/00461520903433539
Josselson, R., & Lieblich, A. (Eds.). (1995). Interpreting experience: The narrative study of lives. Sage Publications, Inc.
Kvale, S. (1994). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications, Inc.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Pratt, Daniel D. & Collins, John B. (2000). "The Teaching Perspectives Inventory (TPI)," Adult Education Research Conference. https://newprairiepress.org/aerc/2000/papers/68
Rohm, A.J., Stefl, M., & Ward, N. (2021). Future proof and real-world ready: the role of live project-based learning in students’ skill development. Journal of Marketing Education, 43(2), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753211001409
Skills Development Scotland. (n.d.). Meta-skills progression framework. https://www.skillsdevelopmentscotland.co.uk/media/48745/meta-skills-progression-framework-final.pdf
Sloman, K., & Thompson, R. (2010). An example of large-group drama and cross-year peer assessment for teaching science in higher education. International Journal of Science Education, 32(14), 1877–1893. https://doi-org.ezproxy.rgu.ac.uk/10.1080/09500690903229312
Stewart, M. (2021). Understanding Learning. In L. Hunt, & D. Chalmers (Eds.), University teaching in focus: a learning-centred approach (pp. 3-28). Taylor and Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003008330
Turner, D. & Pirie, E. (2016). Problems of involvement and detachment: A critical approach to researching live event experiences. In: I. R. Lamond & L. Platt (Eds.), Critical event studies: Approaches to research (pp. 17-355). Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52386-0_2
van der Baan, N., Gast, I., Gijselaers, W., & Beausaert, S. (2022). Coaching to prepare students for their school-to-work transition: conceptualizing core coaching competences. Education & Training, 64(3), 398–415. https://doi-org.ezproxy.rgu.ac.uk/10.1108/ET-11-2020-0341
Waddington, D. (2004). Participant Observation. In C. Cassell & G. Symon. Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp.165-79). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280119
World Economic Forum. (2023). Future of jobs 2023: These are the most in-demand skills now - and beyond. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/05/future-of-jobs-2023-skills/
Ye, C., Lee, H., Cavazos, C., Katrichis, & J. & Hao, A. W. (2021). Peer teaching in digital marketing courses: A conceptual framework. Marketing Education Review, 31(2), 169-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2020.1859388
Zahay, D., Pollitte, W. A., Reavey, B., & Alvarado, A. (2022). An integrated model of digital marketing curriculum design. Marketing Education Review, 32(3), 205–223. https://doi-org.ezproxy.rgu.ac.uk/10.1080/10528008.2021.1947856
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Belinda Vickers, Dr Elliot Pirie, Christina Reid
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
