“On the edge of glory and hanging on a moment of truth”: PgCAP in a rapidly changing and uncertain world
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56433/jpaap.v11i3.583Keywords:
PgCAP, accreditation, professional development, academic development, blended learningAbstract
The last three years have seen rapid changes to learning, teaching and assessment in Higher Education. This paper shares our experiences of leading, teaching and reaccrediting a Postgraduate Certificate in Higher Education (PgCAP) during this time. The PgCAP, much like the staff enrolled on the course, has had to adapt, innovate, and experiment to meet the various challenges. This has included an unplanned move online, to a planned online approach, through to our current blended by design delivery method. Throughout we have sought to model best practice with the risks and rewards this brings. Our revised PgCAP was approved internally in 2022 and subsequently successfully reaccredited with Advance HE on the Professional Standards Framework (PSF). Some of this process was exciting: we felt at the forefront of changes to learning and teaching, to be charting new developments in technology and interaction which our learners could then use in their own teaching. But part of this process was also daunting, feeling we were one moment away from crashing and failing. We tried to learn from those failures and become comfortable working on the edge, with an ever-changing set of priorities and expectations (from ourselves, our learners, and our institution). Our case study: (1) reflects on the challenges, pressures and opportunities associated with PgCAP programmes to model best practice (even in times of crisis), (2) shares how our blended by design approach came about, how it works, and the feedback we have received from participants, (3) demonstrates how we refreshed our content, intended learning outcomes and assessments to map to the PSF 2023.
References
Advance HE, 2022). Beyond Flexible Learning - Modes of learning: a practice guide. Retrieved 09 October, 2023 from: https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/beyond-flexible-learning-practice-guide
Advance HE. (2023). Professional Standards Framework for teaching and supporting learning in higher education 2023 (Second Edition). https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets.creode.advancehe-document-manager/documents/advance-he/PSF%202023%20-%20Screen%20Reader%20Compatible%20-%20final_1675089549.pdf
Butcher, J., & Stoncel, D. (2012). The impact of a Postgraduate Certificate in Teaching in Higher Education on university lecturers appointed for their professional expertise at a teaching-led university: ‘It’s made me braver’. International Journal for Academic Development, 17(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.620107
Cunningham, T., Kennedy, F., & Galvin, T. (2023). Imposter phenomenon in academic developers: Stories, sparring and solace? SEDA Educational Developments, 24.3, 20–22.
Davis, C., & Aleksiev, A. (2020). Exploring the evidence of influence of Postgraduate Certificates in Teaching and Learning on participant practice. SEDA Educational Developments, 21.1. https://www.seda.ac.uk/seda-publishing/educational-developments/past-issues-2000-onwards/educational-developments-issues-21-1/
Eringfeld, S. (2021). Higher education and its post-coronial future: Utopian hopes and dystopian fears at Cambridge University during Covid-19. Studies in Higher Education, 46(1), 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1859681
Hibbert, P., & Semler, M. (2016). Faculty development in teaching and learning: The UK framework and current debates. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(6), 581–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1022201
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). [Educause.edu]. The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Kushnir, I., & Spowart, L. (2021). Feature: University teacher development courses in the UK neoliberal higher education context. https://doi.org/10.26203/TQPQ-C515
MacNeill, S., & Beetham, H. (2023). Beyond blended Post-pandemic curriculum and learning design: Lessons from the higher educaiton (HE) sector (p. 40). JISC. https://repository.jisc.ac.uk/9227/1/beyond-blended-post-pandemic-curriculum-and-learning-design-report.pdf
Mulholland, K., Nichol, D., & Gillespie, A. (2023). ‘It feels like you’re going back to the beginning…’: Addressing imposter feelings in early career academics through the creation of communities of practice. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 47(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2022.2095896
Nordmann, E., Horlin, C., Hutchison, J., Murray, J.-A., Robson, L., Seery, M. K., & MacKay, J. R. D. (2020). Ten simple rules for supporting a temporary online pivot in higher education. PLOS Computational Biology, 16(10), e1008242. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008242
OKeeffe, M., McAvinia, C., Donnelly, R., Harrington, S., & Kelly, M. (n.d.). Care, community and curriculum: A case study of an academic professional development programme.
Salmon, G. (2020, April 29). Covid-19 is the pivot point for online learning [Wonke.com]. Covid-19 Is the Pivot Point for Online Learning. https://wonkhe.com/blogs/covid-19-is-the-pivot-point-for-online-learning/
Scottish Funding Council. (n.d.). Scottish Funding Council guidance to higher education institutions on quality from August 2017-2022 (pp. 1–21). Scottish Funding Council. https://www.sfc.ac.uk/publications-statistics/guidance/SFCGD112017.aspx
Singleton, K. J., Evmenova, A., Kinas Jerome, M., & Clark, K. (2019). Integrating UDL Strategies into the Online Course Development Process: Instructional Designers’ Perspectives. Online Learning, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1407
Sokhanvar, Z., Salehi, K., & Sokhanvar, F. (2021). Advantages of authentic assessment for improving the learning experience and employability skills of higher education students: A systematic literature review. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101030
Spowart, L., Winter, J., Turner, R., Burden, P., Botham, K. A., Muneer, R., Van Der Sluis, H., & Huet, I. (2019). ‘Left with a title but nothing else’: The challenges of embedding professional recognition schemes for teachers within higher education institutions. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(6), 1299–1312. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1616675
Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Bearman, M., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Jorre De St Jorre, T. (2023). Assessment for inclusion: Rethinking contemporary strategies in assessment design. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(2), 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2057451
Thornton, T. (2014). Professional recognition: Promoting recognition through the Higher Education Academy in a UK higher education institution. Tertiary Education and Management, 20(3), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2014.931453
UNESCO. (n.d.). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. UNESCO. Retrieved 10 August 2023, from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374802.locale=en
Van Der Sluis, H. (2023). ‘Frankly, as far as I can see, it has very little to do with teaching’. Exploring academics’ perceptions of the HEA Fellowships. Professional Development in Education, 49(3), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1876153
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Fiona Kennedy, Tom, Tracy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.