Students’ perspectives and experiences with equity, diversity, inclusion, and accessibility in online and in-person undergraduate science laboratory courses

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56433/jpaap.v11i3.581

Keywords:

undergraduate science laboratories, digital education, equity and diversity, inclusive education, accessibility

Abstract

Inclusive education strengthens the capacity of academic systems and addresses the needs of all learners. Although colleges and universities are embracing diversity and introducing inclusive principles into higher education policies and practices, there is scarcity in research exploring undergraduate university students’ participation and engagement in science laboratories, especially among underrepresented and equity-deserving groups. Accordingly, this study explores students’ perspectives on undergraduate laboratory courses and investigates best practices for creating equitable and accessible laboratory environments, both in-person and online. This study addresses the following research questions: 1) How accessible are online and in-person undergraduate laboratory courses to students? 2) What equity, diversity, inclusion, and accessibility (EDIA) barriers exist in laboratory courses? and 3) What support structures are recommended to ensure inclusion of all students in laboratory courses? A mixed methods design was employed to gather data using an online questionnaire and semi-structured interviews with 58 students in undergraduate laboratory science courses from diverse cultural, ethnic, racial, and socioeconomic backgrounds at a Canadian university. 

Findings highlight that students considered online labs to be flexible, convenient, self-paced, relaxed, and inclusive with respect to aspects involving physical disabilities and language barriers. In-person labs were deemed fast-paced, yet valuable for technical skills and inclusive considering elements pertaining to collaboration, academic support, and communication with peers and faculty members. Students highlighted the following as common inclusion barriers in both online and in-person delivery formats: accessibility (physical and language), financial, and stereotypical barriers. Recommendations for improving lab accessibility were also included.

This research has significant implications for the design of laboratory courses and other experiential learning environments in higher education, particularly considering recent transitions and modifications in education. This paper will discuss implications related to the following sub-themes in the special issue: instructors’ professional development, digital education, and quality enhancement.

Author Biographies

  • Mariam Takkouch, Western University

    Mariam Takkouch is a PhD candidate in Curriculum Studies at the Faculty of Education with a collaborative specialization in Environment and Sustainability at Western University, Canada. Her research focuses on science and environmental education, social justice, and experiential learning in K-12 and post-secondary programs.

  • Stephanie Zukowski, Western University

    Stephanie Zukowski, PhD is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Microbiology and Immunology at the Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, Canada. She is also the department’s Undergraduate Chair. Her research focuses on inclusivity and experiential learning in medical sciences education.

  • Nicole Campbell, Western University

    Nicole Campbell, PhD is an Associate Professor in the Department of Physiology and Pharmacology at the Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, Canada. She is the Director of Interdisciplinary Medical Sciences (Undergraduate and Graduate). Her research focuses on interdisciplinary learning and skill development in medical sciences education.

References

Accessible Canada Act, SC 2019, c 10. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/a-0.6/index.html

Adekola, J., Dale, V. H. M., Gardiner, K., & Fischbacher-Smith, M. (2017). Student transitions to blended learning: An institutional case study. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v5i2.273

Attardi, S. M., Barbeau, M. L., & Rogers, K. A. (2018). Improving online interactions: Lessons from an online anatomy course with a laboratory for undergraduate students. Anatomical Sciences Education, 11(6), 592–604. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1776

Aucejo, E. M., French, J., Ugalde Araya, M. P., & Zafar, B. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on student experiences and expectations: Evidence from a survey. Journal of Public Economics, 191, 104271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104271

Basham, J. D., Blackorby, J., & Marino, M. T. (2020). Opportunity in crisis: The role of universal design for learning in educational redesign. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 18(1), 71-91.

Batty, L., & Reilly, K. (2022). Understanding barriers to participation within undergraduate STEM laboratories: Towards development of an inclusive curriculum. Journal of Biological Education, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.2012227

Beck, C. W., & Blumer, L. S. (2021). The relationship between perceptions of instructional practices and student self-efficacy in guided-inquiry laboratory courses. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(1), ar8. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-04-0076

Buery-Joyner, S. D., Baecher-Lind, L., Clare, C. A., Hampton, B. S., Moxley, M. D., Ogunyemi, D., Pradhan, A. A., Madani Sims, S. M., Whetstone, S., Woodland, M. B., & Katz, N. T. (2023). Educational guidelines for diversity and inclusion: Addressing racism and eliminating biases in medical education. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 228(2), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.09.014

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. R. B. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Routledge.

Creamer, E. G. (2018). An introduction to fully integrated mixed methods research. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802823

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

De Oliveira, E., Dantas, R. G., Amaral, G. A., Barreto Giaxa, R. R., & De Góis, A. F. T. (2022). Experiences of disabled students in undergraduate medical education. Medical Teacher, 44(3), 294–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2021.1985098

Delgado, T., Bhark, S., & Donahue, J. (2021). Pandemic Teaching: Creating and teaching cell biology labs online during COVID ‐19. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 49(1), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21482

Elfakki, A. O., Sghaier, S., & Alotaibi, A. A. (2023). An efficient system based on experimental laboratory in 3D virtual environment for students with learning disabilities. Electronics, 12(4), 989. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12040989

Estaiteyeh, M., & DeCoito, I. (2023). Planning for differentiated instruction: Empowering teacher candidates in STEM education. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 23(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-023-00270-5

Gardner, G. E., & Jones, M. G. (2011). Pedagogical preparation of the science graduate teaching assistant: Challenges and implications. Science Educator, 20(2), 31–41.

Goudsouzian, L. K., Riola, P., Ruggles, K., Gupta, P., & Mondoux, M. A. (2018). Integrating cell and molecular biology concepts: Comparing learning gains and self-efficacy in corresponding live and virtual undergraduate laboratory experiences: Integrating Cell and Molecular Biology Concepts. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 46(4), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21133

Grout, I. (2017). Remote laboratories as a means to widen participation in STEM education. Education Sciences, 7(4), 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7040085

Guo, F., Young, J., Deese, N., Pickens-Flynn, T. B., Sellers, D., Perkins, D., & Yakubu, M. (2021). Promoting the diversity, equity, and inclusion in organic chemistry education through undergraduate research experiences at WSSU. Education Sciences, 11(8), 394. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080394

Hanzlick-Burton, C., Ciric, J., Diaz-Rios, M., Colgan, W., & Gage, G. J. (2020). Developing and implementing low-cost remote laboratories for undergraduate biology and neuroscience courses. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education: JUNE: A Publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, 19(1), A118–A123.

Harris, B. N., McCarthy, P. C., Wright, A. M., Schutz, H., Boersma, K. S., Shepherd, S. L., Manning, L. A., Malisch, J. L., & Ellington, R. M. (2020). From panic to pedagogy: Using online active learning to promote inclusive instruction in ecology and evolutionary biology courses and beyond. Ecology and Evolution, 10(22), 12581–12612. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6915

Jeannis, H., Goldberg, M., Seelman, K., Schmeler, M., & Cooper, R. A. (2020). Barriers and facilitators to students with physical disabilities’ participation in academic laboratory spaces. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 15(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1559889

Jenkins, J. J., Sánchez, L. A., Schraedley, M. A. K., Hannans, J., Navick, N., & Young, J. (2020). Textbook broke: Textbook affordability as a social justice issue. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.549

Little, C., Pearson, A., & Gimblett, K. (2023). Reasonable adjustment, unfair advantage or optional extra? Teaching staff attitudes towards reasonable adjustments for students with disabilities. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 11(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.56433/jpaap.v11i2.546

Lucy, C. A., Ries, K. R., & Mensinger, Z. L. (2022). Resources to bring diversity, equity, inclusion, and respect into analytical chemistry classrooms. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 414(28), 7943–7947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-022-04345-4

Mauldin, R. L. (2020). Foundations of social work research. Mavs Open Press.

McGee, E. O. (2020). Interrogating structural racism in STEM higher education. Educational Researcher, 49(9), 633–644. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20972718

Merriam, S., & Tisdell, E. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Moorberg, C. J., & Crouse, D. A. (2017). An open-source laboratory manual for introductory, undergraduate soil science courses. Natural Sciences Education, 46(1), 170013. https://doi.org/10.4195/nse2017.06.0013

Moriña, A. (2017). Inclusive education in higher education: Challenges and opportunities. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 32(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2016.1254964

Mullins, L., & Preyde, M. (2013). The lived experience of students with an invisible disability at a Canadian university. Disability & Society, 28(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.752127

Ontario Human Rights Commission (2003). Main barriers to education for students with disabilities. https://www.ohrc.on.ca/en/main-barriers-education-students-disabilities-fact-sheet

Racic, M., Roche-Miranda, M. I., & Fatahi, G. (2023). Twelve tips for implementing and teaching anti-racism curriculum in medical education. Medical Teacher, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2023.2206534

Ramachandran, A., Mouat, I. C., & Öberg, G. (2023). Incorporating equity, diversity, and inclusion in science: Lessons learned from an undergraduate seminar. Science Education, 107(1), 180–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21768

Ramiah, R., Godinho, L., & Wilson, C. (2022). Tertiary STEM for all: Enabling student success through teaching for equity, diversity and inclusion in STEM. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.30722/IJISME.30.03.003

Reese, A. J. (2020). An undergraduate elective course that introduces topics of diversity, equity, and inclusion into discussions of science. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 21(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v21i1.1947

Rodriguez, A. J., Ciftci, A., Howell, K., Kokini, K., Wright, B., & Nikalje, A. (2022). Promoting equity, diversity and social justice through faculty-led transformative projects. Innovative Higher Education, 47(2), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-021-09560-y

Sigaeva, T., Fiori, C. J. B. M., Pino Alban, M. J., Beauferris, Y., Stagg, D., & Di Martino, E. S. (2020). “Hands-on, minds-on, and science-up”: A concept-based learning laboratory with a taste of research experience for an undergraduate biomedical engineering course. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 142(11), 111005. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047923

Singer‐Freeman, K., & Bastone, L. (2019). Developmental science concepts guide effective support of underrepresented STEM students. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 47(5), 506–512. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21292

Sukhai, M. A., Mohler, C. E., Doyle, T., Carson, E., Nieder, C., Levy-Pinto, D., Duffet, E., and Smith, F. (2014). Creating an accessible science laboratory environment for students with disabilities. Council of Ontario Universities, 1-28.

UNESCO (2003). Overcoming exclusion through inclusive approaches in education: a challenge and a vision: Conceptual paper. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000134785

UNESCO (2017). A Guide for ensuring inclusion and equity in education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000248254

Wheeler, L. B., Maeng, J. L., Chiu, J. L., & Bell, R. L. (2017). Do teaching assistants matter? Investigating relationships between teaching assistants and student outcomes in undergraduate science laboratory classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(4), 463–492. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21373

Downloads

Published

2023-12-23

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 3 (2023): 10th Anniversary Special Issue. Academic practice at the edge: risks and rewards of innovation in learning, teaching, and the student experience

Section

Original Research

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Mariam Takkouch, Stephanie Zukowski, Nicole Campbell

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.