Propelling Student Engagement in Blended Learning Courses
A study of an English University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56433/jpaap.v11i3.578Keywords:
Blended Learning, Student Engagement, Digital Transformation, Educational Leadership, Higher EducationAbstract
This paper looks at the realities of Blended Learning – a continuing and complex change across education that needs more research in order to develop best practice and maximise student engagement. Using a mixed methods approach, the explanatory factors of the level of student engagement in a respected English Higher Educational Institution are explored. By calculating how many days within the semester the median student accessed the Virtual Learning Environment [VLE] per module [n=562], each is categorised as having ‘High’, ‘Medium’ or ‘Low’ student engagement. The outcomes are supplemented by a thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with Module Leaders. The results suggested that engaging Blended Learning courses have a higher number of formative assessments, more recordings available, are delivered in a way that is best suited for the student cohort (whether that be remote, in-person or hybrid), and have resources on the VLE of a higher quality than quantity. To maximise student engagement, Module Leaders should interweave active learning and didactic teaching in their seminars and lectures, have a high level of enthusiasm for the subject material, and have a strong ability in the educational technology available to them. It can be concluded that in transforming the way Module Leaders build and deliver their Blended Learning courses, we may create a shift towards a higher level of student engagement. There are important lessons here for senior leaders in terms of how they understand Blended Learning, how it relates to their values and vision and what strategies they might use to encourage and plan for best practice.
References
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic Networks: An Analytic Tool for Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research, 1, 385-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307
Babakova, L., Kolovska, T., & Konstantinidou, K. (2021). Influence of Distance Motivation on the Academic Motivation of Students from Specialities in the Field of Arts. Proceedings of CBU in Social Sciences, 2, 22–26. https://doi.org/10.12955/pss.v2.197
Barber, M. (2021). Gravity Assist: Propelling higher education towards a brighter future – Digital teaching and learning review. Retrieved from https://ofslivefs.blob.core.windows.net/files/Gravity%20assist/Gravity-assist-DTL-finalforweb.pdf
Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. (2020). Emergency Remote Teaching in a Time of Global Crisis Due to Coronavirus Pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1-6.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cook, D., & Artino, A. (2016). Motivation to learn: An overview of contemporary theories. Medical Education, 50(10), 997–1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13074
Eccles, J. S. (2005). Evolution of the brain: Creation of the self. Oxfordshire: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203976661
Elmore, R. F. (1979). Backward mapping: Implementation research and policy decisions. Political Science Quarterly, 94(4), 601-618. https://doi.org/10.2307/2149628
Greene, B. A., & Miller, R. B. (1996). Influences on Achievement: Goals, Perceived Ability, and Cognitive Engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0015
Harackiewicz, J. M., Canning, E. A., Tibbetts, Y., Priniski, S. J., & Hyde, J. S. (2016). Closing achievement gaps with a utility-value intervention: Disentangling race and social class. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), 745–765. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000075
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
King, A. (1993). From Sage on the Stage to Guide on the Side. College Teaching, 41(1), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.1993.9926781
Lavrijsen, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Boncquet, M., & Verschueren, K. (2021). Does motivation predict changes in academic achievement beyond intelligence and personality? A multitheoretical perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(4), 772-790. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000666
Lazarides, R., Gaspard, H., & Dicke, A.-L. (2019). Dynamics of classroom motivation: Teacher enthusiasm and the development of math interest and teacher support. Learning and Instruction, 60, 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.012
Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Wormington, S. V., Snyder, K. E., Riggsbee, J., Perez, T., Ben-Eliyahu, A., & Hill, N. E. (2018). Multiple pathways to success: An examination of integrative motivational profiles among upper elementary and college students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(7), 1026–1048. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030118
OECD. (2008). Assessment for Learning Formative Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/site/educeri21st/40600533.pdf
Pregowska, A., Masztalerz, K., Garlińska, M., & Osial, M. (2021). A Worldwide Journey through Distance Education—From the Post Office to Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Realities, and Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(3), 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030118
Russell, J. (2008). Enthusiastic Educational Leadership. Florida Journal of Educational Administration & Policy, 1(2).
Steinmayr, R., Weidinger, A. F., Schwinger, M., & Spinath, B. (2019). The Importance of Students’ Motivation for Their Academic Achievement – Replicating and Extending Previous Findings. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01730
Vanslambrouck, S., Zhu, C., Lombaerts, K., Philipsen, B., & Tondeur, J. (2018). Students’ motivation and subjective task value of participating in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 36, 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.09.002
Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.12.001
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12(3), 265–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(92)90011-P
Woodfield, R., Jessop, D., & McMillan, L. (2006). Gender differences in undergraduate attendance rates. Studies in Higher Education, 31(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500340127
Xu, J. (2022). A profile analysis of online assignment motivation: Combining achievement goal and expectancy-value perspectives. Computers & Education, 177. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104367
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Alexandra Buchan, Dr Robin Precey
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
