Challenging male homophily and bias in academic research and practice

Authors

  • Keith Smyth University of the Highlands and Islands

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56433/jpaap.v11i1.550

Keywords:

homophily, male bias, gender representation, academia, pragmatic approaches and interventions

Abstract

This opinion piece focuses on the nature of male homophily and bias in academic research, publishing and practice, and how homophilic practices in writing, reviewing and publishing academic research disproportionately advantage the academic work and voices of male academics while disenfranchising those of women within ‘the academy’ and academic institutions. After first briefly considering the nature of male homophily and relevant historical dimensions, attention then turns to the practices that prevail today including the stark realities presented by recent research. Pragmatic responses to tackling male homophily and bias in academic work, cultures and practices are then considered, in areas including the work of journals and their editorial boards, research leadership and supervision, academic leadership and in learning and teaching.

Author Biography

  • Keith Smyth, University of the Highlands and Islands

    Keith Smyth is Dean of Learning and Teaching and Professor of Pedagogy at the University of the Highlands and Islands, and one of the founding editors of the Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice. Keith is on Twitter @smythkrs and blogs sporadically at http://3eeducation.org/

References

Bell, M.L. and Fong, K.C. (2021). Gender differences in first and corresponding authorship in public health research submissions during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Journal of Public Health, 111(1), 159-163. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305975

Frances, D.N., Fitzpatrick, C.R., Koprivnikar, J. and McCauley, S.J. (2020). Effects of inferred gender on patterns of co‐authorship in ecology and evolutionary biology publications. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 101(3), p.e01705. https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.1705

Grove, J. (2022, February 24). Male dominated editorial boards ‘hold back psychology’. Times Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/male-dominated-editorial-boards-hold-back-psychology

Guglielmi, G. (2018). Gender bias tilts success of grant applications. Nature, 554(7690), 14-15.

King, M.M., Bergstrom, C.T., Correll, S.J., Jacquet, J. and West, J.D. (2017). Men set their own cites high: Gender and self-citation across fields and over time. Socius, 3, p.2378023117738903. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117738903

Liévano-Latorre, L.F., da Silva, R.A., Vieira, R.R., Resende, F.M., Ribeiro, B.R., Borges, F.J., Sales, L. and Loyola, R. (2020). Pervasive gender bias in editorial boards of biodiversity conservation journals. Biological Conservation, 251, p.108767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108767

Smyth, K. (2021). Distancing the (privileged) male from the machine: supporting gender balance and representation through acts of allyship in academic processes and practices. In A. Walker (Ed.), Gender equality, representation and balance within and beyond the University of the Highlands and Islands: A book in celebration of International Women’s Day 2021 (pp.109-150) UHI/eTIPS. https://omp.uhi.ac.uk/uhim/catalog/book/iwd2021

Stevenson, J. (2009). Women and the cultural politics of printing. The Seventeenth Century, 24(2), 205-237.

Walker, A. (2021). Women’s networks in further and higher education – key consideration for cultural change, digital engagement and responding to COVID-19. In A. Walker (Ed.), Gender equality and representation within and beyond the University of the Highlands and Islands: A book in celebration of International Women’s Day 2021 (pp. 33-72). UHI/eTIPS. https://omp.uhi.ac.uk/uhim/catalog/book/iwd2021

Wider, K. (1986). Women philosophers in the ancient Greek world: Donning the mantle. Hypatia, 1(1), 21-62.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-22