Preparing to teach online before and during emergency pandemic teaching: staff perceptions and future directions

Authors

  • Alison Clapp Newcastle University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v9i3.511

Keywords:

staff development, online teaching, innovation champions, education technologists, mentors

Abstract

Online teaching, using internet-based resources with students at a distance, could be described as an innovation when compared to the traditional in-person teaching carried out by universities. This makes Rogers’ diffusion of innovations theory useful for examining the factors that enable this mode of teaching to be used, including staff development.  Teaching online requires different techniques to teaching in campus-based courses to provide good student engagement. Transition to online teaching can be a daunting experience if development of online teaching skills and knowledge is poor, or absent. This study aimed to investigate practices and perceptions of efficacy in staff development with surveys, utilising staff replies to suggest future provision of staff training, in terms of Rogers’ theory. The study objectives were to elucidate from staff what training was received prior to their transition to online teaching, their opinions on its effectiveness, other specific training they consider necessary and timeliness of current provision. Two groups were surveyed. The pre-COVID-19 group (22 staff), the innovators, taught online distance masters students in a UK medical school Graduate School. The COVID-19 emergency teaching group (27 staff) normally taught in-person masters courses and could be considered Rogers’ late adopters. Thematic analysis of comments revealed that for both cohorts training was hit and miss, with some feeling adequately trained and others struggling with the new mode. Clear knowledge of who to ask for help, with education technologists as innovation champions, provided confidence in teaching, as did the availability of exemplars of good practice. Barriers to teaching confidence came from lack of support and time for training. Future training provision with technologists acting as innovation champions and support from them and early adopters as mentors is suggested, with staff working relationally together.

References

Ally, M. (2008). Foundations of educational theory for online learning in Anderson, The theory and practice of online learning at https://www.aupress.ca/app/uploads/120146_99Z_Anderson_2008-Theory_and_Practice_of_Online_Learning.pdf
Barczyk, C., Buckenmeyer, J., Feldman, L., & Hixon, E. (2011). Assessment of a university‐based distance education mentoring program from a quality management perspective. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 19(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2011.543567
Bennett, S & Lockyer, L. (2004). Becoming an online teacher: adapting to a changed environment for teaching and learning in higher education, Educational Media International, 41(3), 231-248, https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980410001680842
Brown, B, Eaton, S.E, Jacobsen, M.D, Roy, S & Friesen, S. (2013). Instructional design collaboration: a professional learning and growth experience. Merlot Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 9(3), 439-454, http://hdl.handle.net/1880/109272
Bryant, J., & Bates, A.J. (2015). Creating a constructivist online instructional environment. Tech Trends 59, 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-015-0834-1
Charlesworth, Z.M., & Murphy, H.C. (2016) October 26th-28th. A review of innovative teaching in the context of technology enhanced learning. EuroCHRIE 2016 Conference, Budapest Metropolitan University, Hungary
Clapp, A, Reynolds, A., Bell, B., Lockhart, E., Todd, G., & Connell, T. (2019). Planning the development and maintenance of online distance learning courses. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 22(1). https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring221/clapp_reynolds_bell_lockhart_todd_connell221.html
Clapp, A. (2021). Lessons for staff development: lecturers’ transition from face-to-face to online teaching for masters courses in higher education. International Journal of Contemporary Education, 4(2), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijce.v4i2.5248
Cochrane, T, Black, B., Lee, M., Narayan, V., & Verswijvelen, M. (2013). Rethinking e-learning support strategies. International Journal for Academic Development, 18:3, 276-293, https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2012.733884
Cramp, A. (2013). Meaningful dialogue in digitally mediated learning for in-service teacher development. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2013.822417
Dempster, J. A., Benfield, G., & Francis, R. (2012). An academic development model for fostering innovation and sharing in curriculum design. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(2), 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.677595
Donnelly, R. (2013). The role of the PBL tutor within blended academic development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50(2), 133-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.760866
Edwards, A. (2007). Relational Agency in Professional Practice: A CHAT analysis. Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 1, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370500169178
Engeström, Y. (2008). From Teams to Knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work (Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives) UK, Cambridge, CUP.
Ferri, F., Grifoni, P., & Guzzo, T. (2020). Online learning and emergency remote teaching: opportunities and challenges in emergency situations. Societies, 10(86), https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10040086
Gachago, D., Morkel, J., Hitge, L., van Zyl, I., & Ivala, E. (2017). Developing eLearning champions: a design thinking approach. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(30), https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0068-8
Gillett-Swan, J. (2017). The challenges of online learning: supporting and engaging the isolated learner. Journal of Learning Design special issue: business management 10(1), 20-31. https://doi.org/10.5204/JLD.V9I3.293
Hamill, D. (2020). Using Blackboard (VLE) to support teaching practice of academic staff in response to COVID19. AISHE-J 12(3), 1-9. https://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/download/485/837
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, March 27th). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online
learning. Educause Review https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Muilenburg, L., & Berge, Z. L. (2001). Barriers to distance education: a factor-analytic study. The American Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 7–
22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527081
Northcote, M., Gosselin, K. P., Reynaud, D., Kilgour, P. & Anderson, M. (2015). Navigating the learning journeys of online teachers: threshold
concepts and self-efficacy. Issues in Educational Research, 25(3), 319-344. http://www.iier.org.au/iier25/northcote.pdf
Panda, S., & Mishra, S. (2007). E‐Learning in a Mega Open University: Faculty attitude, barriers and motivators. Educational Media International,
44(4), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980701680854
Paradis, E., O'Brien, B., Nimmon, L., Bandiera, G., & Martimianakis, M.A. (2016). Design: selection of data collection methods. Journal of Graduate
Medical Education, 8(2), 263-264. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-16-00098.1
Peacock, S., & DePlacido, C. (2018). Supporting staff transitions into online learning: a networking approach Journal of Perspectives in Applied
Academic Practice 6(2), 67-77. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.336
Petronzi, R., & Petronzi, D. (2020) The Online and Campus (OaC) model as a sustainable blended approach to teaching and learning in higher
education: A response to COVID-19. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4(4), 498-508. http://dx.doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2020064475
QSR (2016) at: http://www.qsrinternational.com/
Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations 5th edition. USA, Simon and Schuster
Salmon, G. (2005). Flying not flapping: a strategic framework for e-learning and pedagogical innovation in higher education
institutions. ALT-J, 13(3), 201–218. https://doi.org10.1080/09687760500376439
University of Edinburgh. (2016). Manifesto for teaching online 2016. https://onlineteachingmanifesto.wordpress.com/

Downloads

Published

2022-01-21

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 3 (2021): JPAAP Vol 9, No 3(2021)

Section

Original Research

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.