Enhanced student satisfaction through effective supervisor- supervisee allocation: A case study


  • Lovleen Kushwah University of Glasgow
  • Paulina Navrouzoglou University of Glasgow




undergraduate dissertation, supervisor allocation, intervention, speed networking, personalized student learning


Dissertation is an independent piece of work which is a key component of many undergraduate taught programmes. To deliver a personalized learning experience and enhance student satisfaction, effective supervisor-supervisee allocation is crucial. This paper employed a case study approach to pilot three allocation methods over three years in an attempt to improve student dissertation experience through supervisor-supervisee allocation. Online survey data were collected and analysed. The findings revealed that a scaffolded matching approach that allows interaction and expression of interests could significantly enhance student engagement and satisfaction with the undergraduate dissertation supervision.


Armstrong, S., Allinson, C., & Hayes, J. (2004). The Effects of Cognitive Style on Research Supervision: A Study of Student-Supervisor Dyads in Management Education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3, 41–63. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2004.12436818
Bennett, S., & Deal, K. H. (2009). Beginnings and endings in social work supervision: The interaction between attachment and developmental processes. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 29, 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841230802238179
Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2004). Fundamentals of clinical supervision. MA: Pearson.
Bordin, E.S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy, 16, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0085885
Bordin, E.S. (1983). A working alliance model of supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 11, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000083111007
Brown, G., & Atkins, M. (1988). Effective teaching in higher education. London: Methuen.
Campbell, J. M. (2000). Becoming an effective supervisor: A workbook for counselor and psychotherapist. USA: Routledge.
Cook, M. C. F. (1980). The role of academic supervisor for undergraduate dissertations in science and science-related subjects. Studies in Higher Education, 5, 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075078012331377206
Egglestone, J., & Delamont, S. (1983). Supervision of students for research degrees. Birmingham: BERA.
Ellis, M. V. (2010). Bridging the science and practice of clinical supervision: Some discoveries, some misconceptions. The Clinical Supervisor, 29(1), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325221003741910
Elton, L., & Pope, M. (1989). Research supervision: The value of collegiality. Cambridge Journal of Education, 19(3), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764890190302
Harrow, J., & Loewenthal, D. (1992). Management research supervision: some users’ perspectives on roles, interventions and power, Management Education and Development, 23(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050769202300115
Hemmings, S. (2001). The place of the dissertation in learning to research. In Humphrey, R. and Middleton, C. (Ed.), Learning to research: resources for learning and teaching in sociology and social policy. Sheffield, SSP2000/Teaching and Learning Network for Sociology and Social Policy.
Hill, T., Acker, S., & Black, E. (1994) Research students and their supervisors in education and psychology, in R. G. Burgess (Ed.) Postgraduate Education and Training in the Social Sciences: processes and products. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Gatfield, T. J. (2005). An investigation into PhD Supervisory Management Styles: Development of a dynamic conceptual model and its managerial implications. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(3), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800500283585
Ghazali N. M., Taha, M., Wan Jaafar, W. M., Anuar, A., Yahya, F., & Roose, M. (2016). Influence of Supervisory Relationship and Satisfaction among Trainee Counselors in Practicum Process. Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, 2. 85-95. https://doi.org/10.33736/jcshd.364.2016
Glenice, I., & Glen, R. (2005). Supervisor Selection or Allocation and Continuity of Supervision: Ph.d. Students’ Progress and Outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 30. 535-555. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500249161
Ladany, N., Hill, C. E., Corbett, M. M., & Nutt, E. A. (1996). Nature, extent, and importance of what psychotherapy trainees do not disclose to their supervisors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(1), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.43.1.10
Ladany, N., & Lehrman-Waterman, D. E. (1999). The content and frequency of supervisor self- disclosures and their relationship to supervisor style and the supervisory working alliance. Counselor Education and Supervision, 38(3), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.1999.tb00567.x
Magnuson, S., Wilcoxon, S. A., & Norem, K. (2000). A profile of lousy supervision: Experienced counselors' perspectives. Counselor Education and Supervision, 39(3), 189-202. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2000.tb01231.x
Martin, P., Kumar, S., Lizarondo, L., & Tyack, Z. (2016). Factors influencing the perceived quality of clinical supervision of occupational therapists in a large Australian state. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 63 (5), 338-346. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1085-8
Martin, P., & Milne, D. (2017). Choice of clinical supervisor: Cunning or collusion?. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74.
Nelson, M. L., & Friedlander, M. L. (2001). A close look at conflictual supervisory relationships: The trainee's perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(4), 384–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.48.4.384
Pathirage, C., Haigh, R., Amaratunga, D., Baldry, D. & Green, C. (2004). Improving dissertation assessment. University of Salford. Retrieved 10 January, 2020, from http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/22716/1/chp_04.pdf
Powles, M. (1993). Staff development for PhD supervision. In D. J. Cullen (Ed.), Quality in PhD education (pp. 75-84). Canberra: Australian National University.
Ramos-Sanchez, L., Esnil, E., Goodwin, A., Riggs, S., Touster, L. O., Wright, L. K., & Rodolfa, E. (2002). Negative supervisory events: Effects on supervision and supervisory alliance. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33(2), 197–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.33.2.197
Rowley, J., & Slack, F. (2004). What is the future for undergraduate dissertations? Educ. Train. 46, 176–181. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910410543964
Todd, M.J., Bannister, P., & Clegg, S. (2004). Independent inquiry and the undergraduate dissertation: Perceptions and experiences of final year social science students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(3): 335–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000188285
Todd, M.J., Smith, K., & Bannister, P. (2006). Supervising a social science undergraduate dissertation: Staff experiences and perceptions. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(2): 161–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510500527693
Tolstoy, L. (1875-1877/2001). Anna Karenina (Original work published 1875-1877) (R. P. L. Volokhonsky, Trans.). New York, NY, USA: Viking Penguin.
Vera, J., & Briones, E. (2015). Students' perspectives on the processes of supervision and assessment of undergraduate dissertations. Culture and Education, 27, 726–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2015.1089391
Verrier, D., & Day, C. (2020). How can we improve the final year dissertation? A consideration of ethics, quality, and one-to-one supervision. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 8 (2), 90-96. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v8i2.395
Wilkin P., Bowers L., & Monk J. (1997). Clinical supervision: managing the resistance. Nursing Times, 93, 48-49