To Flip Or Not To Flip? Reflecting On PALPable Outcomes Of Flipping The Classroom During The Pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v9i2.492Keywords:
flipped classroom, students as partners, co-creation of experience, action learning, educational innovationAbstract
The word “pivot” became the teeth-grinding buzzword of 2020 for academics. The first half of 2020 was fueled by adrenalin, requiring educators to frantically search for new approaches, techniques, and tricks that might work, grabbing at each possible straw, in order to ensure that learning outcomes were achieved despite the largely unknown and unpredictable circumstances. Everyone, especially innovators and early-adopters, performed at their best, hoping that the emergency teaching that was required was only short-term. However, by mid-2020, it had become apparent that these challenges were ongoing – perspectives did not become any clearer, Zoom fatigue became obvious, and academics were scared to even think about the next semester. At the University of Sydney, the partial return to the physical classroom in September 2020, added an additional layer of complexity, as educators now needed to plan for both online and face-to-face classes, and find engaging class activities that would work effectively in both formats. In this multimedia publication, we conducted a multidimensional reflective analysis on flipping the classroom when teaching and learning Organisational Communication at the University of Sydney Business School (145 students: 3 online + 2 face-to-face classes across 12 weeks). Staying true to the transparency of the “students as partners” approach, this publication is co-created (co-authored) together with students. It draws on the results of student surveys and students setting the priorities among the pre-defined learning outcomes, weekly goal-setting and self-reflection via Personal Action Learning Portals (PALP) created in Student Relationship Engagement System (SRES). Creative video interviews increase student voice and provide their interpretation of student survey questions.
References
Ishkova, M. (2020) #jobready. Retrieved 5 April from https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6708191662688104448/
Stapleton, G., Price, K., & Sneddon, S. (2020). Why The Flipped Lecture Is Not A “One Size Fits All” Solution To Undergraduate Medical Education. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 8(2), 50–57. https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.sydney.edu.au/10.14297/jpaap.v8i2.411
Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171-193. doi:10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4
Student Experience Survey. (2020). 2020 Student Experience Survey. Retrieved 5 April from: https://www.qilt.edu.au/docs/default-source/ses/ses-2020/2020-ses-national-report.pdf?sfvrsn=a3ffed3c_2
Student Relationship Engagement System. (2021). License. Retrieved 5 April, 2021 from https://sres.io/licence/
The Guardian. (2020). Australian university education predicted to decline amid job cuts and ballooning enrolments. Retrieved 5 April from https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/aug/26/australian-university-education-predicted-to-decline-amid-job-cuts-and-ballooning-enrolments
The University of Sydney. (2020). Units: WORK3205. Retrieved 5 April, 2021 from https://www.sydney.edu.au/units/WORK3205/2020-S2C-ND-CC
The University of Sydney. (2021). Students give thumbs up to new study experience. Retrieved 5 April, 2021, from https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2021/03/19/students-give-thumbs-up-to-new-study-experience.html
The University of Sydney Business School. (2021). Strategic vision. Retrieved 5 April, 2021, from https://www.sydney.edu.au/business/about/strategic-vision.html
Yeganeh, B. & Kolb, D. (2012). Mindfulness and Experiential Learning. In Handbook for Strategic HR (p. 152–). AMACOM.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.