Creating playful spaces for collaborative development of online teaching capacity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v9i2.485Keywords:
online pedagogy, playful learning, collaboration, participation, professional developmentAbstract
Transition to online learning presents technological and emotional challenges. Lack of attention to staff-student relationships, coupled with limitations in technology can be demotivating. Losing face-to-face contact has left academic staff with the hard work of reinventing themselves, finding new ways to assert their presence and humanity in what can be experienced as soulless and sometimes soul-destroying online environments. Professional development in online teaching can be reduced to top-down skills training in using specific tools. In this paper we argue for a more playful, collaborative approach to professional development, creating spaces for exploration, risk-taking, enjoyment and participation.
Ongoing changes in technologies and a shift to almost entirely online learning in the Open University has required us to work differently with students. Most OU tuition is done by associate lecturers, on fractional contracts when this project was carried out, who work closely with students but rarely create curriculum, assessment or strategy. This reflects a wider trend within the HE sector towards casualised, precarious labour, with those closest to students often lacking power.
This paper reflects on a scholarship project focused on the lived experience of four associate lecturers, negotiating the transition from blended to entirely online tuition, working with two full-time academic staff. Participants differed in experience and enthusiasm for online learning; some keen 'early adopters', others closer to the 'reluctant majority'. Using action learning sets, online spaces and pedagogical practices were explored through shared self-reflections. Building strong relationships between colleagues created space where they could safely experiment. We argue that such 'playful learning' (Nørgård et al., 2017) is key for professional development. It can address reluctance to embrace new technologies and empower participants to reclaim their professional identity and expertise. Participants shifted from considering online learning as an obstacle, to seeing new opportunities to create democratic, inclusive, and collaborative learning spaces.
References
Aquarone, F., Nehéz-Posony, L., Anwar, P. R., Salam, S., Koutsouri, E., Kim, M., Suh, S., Mayomi, T., Pilarska, J., Houghton, E., & Booda, Y. (2020). ‘We’re trying to do things differently’: The challenges of relationships and recognition in Higher Education. Centre for Public Policy Research (CPPR).
Ayling, P. (2012). Learning through Playing in Higher Education: Promoting Play as a Skill for Social Work Students. Social Work Education, 31(6), 764–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2012.695185
Baxter, J. (2012). The impact of professional learning on the teaching identities of higher education lecturers. EURODL (European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning), 2012(2), Article 2. http://www.eurodl.org/?article=527
Baxter, J., Callaghan, G., & McAvoy, J. (2018). Creativity and Critique in Online Learning: Exploring and Examining Innovations in Online Pedagogy. Springer.
Bentinck, V. A. (2020). The Transition To Blended Learning: Students’ Perceptions Of Online Interaction [EdD, The Open University]. http://oro.open.ac.uk/72589/
Bolton, G. (2010). Reflective Practice (3rd ed.). Sage.
Boyle, E. A., Hainey, T., Connolly, T. M., Gray, G., Earp, J., Ott, M., Lim, T., Ninaus, M., Ribeiro, C., & Pereira, J. (2016). An update to the systematic literature review of empirical evidence of the impacts and outcomes of computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 94, 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.003
Brookfield, S. (2017). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. Jossey Bass.
Bryson, C. (2013). Supporting Sessional Teaching Staff in the UK–to What Extent is There Real Progress? Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 10(3), 2.
Clayson, S. (2021). Nostalgia and Identity. In S. M. Morris, L. Rai, & K. Littleton (Eds.), Voices of Practice: Narrative Scholarship from the Margins. Hybrid Pedagogy Incorporated.
Clegg, S., & Rowland, S. (2010). Kindness in pedagogical practice and academic life. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(6), 719–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2010.515102
Courtois, A. D. M., & O’Keefe, T. (2015). Precarity in the ivory cage: Neoliberalism and casualisation of work in the Irish higher education sector. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 13(1).
Douce, C. (2018). Understanding on-line teaching practice: The importance of the observation. The Open University. http://www.open.ac.uk/about/teaching-and-learning/esteem/projects/themes/onlineonscreen-stem-practice/understanding-line-teaching-practice-the-importance-the
Fook, J., Collington, V., Ross, F., Ruch, G., & West, L. (2015). Researching critical reflection: Multidisciplinary perspectives. Routledge.
García-Morales, V. J., Garrido-Moreno, A., & Martín-Rojas, R. (2021). The Transformation of Higher Education After the COVID Disruption: Emerging Challenges in an Online Learning Scenario. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616059
Goouch, K. (2008). Understanding playful pedagogies, play narratives and play spaces. Early Years, 28(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575140701815136
Hitch, D., Mahoney, P., & Macfarlane, S. (2018). Professional development for sessional staff in higher education: A review of current evidence. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(2), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1360844
Holmwood, J., & Marcuello Servós, C. (2019). Challenges to public universities: Digitalisation, commodification and precarity. Social Epistemology, 33(4), 309–320.
Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, Texts and Affordances. Sociology, 35(2). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/S0038038501000219
Jones, M. H., & Gallen, A.-M. (2016). Peer observation, feedback and reflection for development of practice in synchronous online teaching. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(6), 616–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1025808
King, P. (2018). An evaluation of using playful and non-playful tasks when teaching research methods in adult higher education. Reflective Practice, 19(5), 666–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2018.1538957
Macdonald, J., & Campbell, A. (2012). Demonstrating online teaching in the disciplines. A systematic approach to activity design for online synchronous tuition. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 883–891.
McComb, V., Eather, N., & Imig, S. (2020). Casual academic staff experiences in higher education: Insights for academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 26(1), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2020.1827259
McNaughton, S. M., & Billot, J. (2016). Negotiating academic teacher identity shifts during higher education contextual change. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(6), 644–658.
McNiff, J. (2013). Action Research: Principles and practice. (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Morris, S. M. (2018). Critical Instructional Design. In S. M. Morris & J. Stommel (Eds.), An Urgency of Teachers: The Work of Critical Digital Pedagogy. Hybrid Pedagogy Incorporated.
Nørgård, R. T., Toft-Nielsen, C., & Whitton, N. (2017). Playful learning in higher education: Developing a signature pedagogy. International Journal of Play, 6(3), 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2017.1382997
Richardson, J. C., & Alsup, J. (2015). From the Classroom to the Keyboard: How Seven Teachers Created Their Online Teacher Identities. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1), 142–167. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.1814
Schon, D. A. (1984). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (Vol. 5126). Basic Books.
Smidt, S. (2011). Playing to Learn: The Role of Play in the Early Years. Routledge.
Somekh, B. (2005). Action Research: A Methodology For Change And Development: A Methodology for Change and Development. McGraw-Hill Education.
Stickler, U., & Hampel, R. (2007). Designing online tutor training for language courses: A case study. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 22(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680510601100176
Thompson, N. (2018). Promoting Equality: Working with Diversity and Difference (4th ed.). Palgrave.
Walker, C., & Gleaves, A. (2016). Constructing the caring higher education teacher: A theoretical framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 54, 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.11.013
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
