Lessons learned from being BOLD: Staff experiences of an institutional strategic project in Blended and Online Learning Development

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v9i2.484

Keywords:

blended learning, online learning, digital capability building, strategic projects, digital education

Abstract

In recent years, tertiary institutions have engaged more with digital education, especially blended and online learning. One institution sought to transform its existing provision, and enhance learning and teaching, through a substantial strategic funding initiative comprising almost 20 individual projects.

To capture the learning from this substantial investment, 20 semi-structured interviews were carried out with staff involved in setting up or working on these projects, typically early adopters. Interviews sought to revisit motivations to engage with the project, and capture perceived benefits including lessons learned, challenges, enablers, support needs and recommendations going forwards.

Participants were motivated to enhance their own teaching practice and improve student learning experience/outcomes. Recognised benefits included enhanced learner experience, transformed teaching practice, flexibility and access, teaching efficiencies, and developmental opportunities for staff. Significant challenges related to the time required to design, develop and implement courses, as well as technological and student-related issues. Despite these challenges, participation in the project led to the development of new skills and transformed teachers’ learning and teaching practice. This was made possible through a number of enablers including prior experience of blended learning, and supportive others from across various services, schools and colleges.

The study highlights the importance of strategic projects in expanding the digital capabilities of an institution to meet the expected—and unexpected—demands of the future. The findings are discussed in the context of the current literature on blended and remote learning, and existing institutional frameworks that support transitions to blended learning.

 

Author Biographies

  • Vicki Harcus Morgan Dale, Dr, University of Glasgow

    Dr Vicki H.M. Dale, BSc MSc MEd PhD CMALT SFHEA, is a Senior Academic and Digital Development Adviser, with a focus on academic development for active and blended learning. Vicki was the pedagogical lead for the BOLD project and the leading researcher on the Transitions to Blended Learning project QAA project, latterly serving as the institutional lead. Vicki sits on the organising committee for the Association for Learning Technology Scotland group.

  • Eva Kubincova

    Eva Kubincová, MA MSc, was a Research Assistant in School of Education, University of Glasgow participating in educational development projects including QAA-funded Enhancement Themes ‘Transitions to blended learning’ project as well as the evaluation of the BOLD project.

  • John Kerr, Mr, University of Glasgow

    John Kerr, BSc (Dist) MA, FHEA, CMALT, is the Learning Innovation Unit Manager at the University of Glasgow. John leads a team of Learning Innovation Officers, tasked with delivering digital culture change across the institution. John is responsible for developing Glasgow’s MOOC portfolio with FutureLearn and Coursera. His responsibilities also include delivering on a range of MicroCredentials and fully online degrees in partnership with these platforms. John also chairs the Scottish MOOC Committee and is the author of the MOOC Design Mapping Framework. 

  • Jo-Anne Murray, Professor, University of Glasgow

    Professor Jo-Anne Murray, PhD, MSc, PgDip, PgCert, BSc(hons), BHSII, RNutr, PFHEA, is Professor of Educational Innovation and has led digital education strategy for the University of Glasgow since the BOLD project. Jo-Anne has also led the development of a range of innovative learning and teaching approaches including virtual worlds, mobile apps and MOOCs. Jo-Anne has also led and participated in a range of research activities in education and is often invited to speak at educational conferences about her work in digital education.   

References

Adekola, J., Dale, V. H. M., & Gardiner, K. (2017). Development of an institutional framework to guide transitions into enhanced blended learning in higher education. Research in Learning Technology, 25, 1-16. doi:https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v25.1973
Adekola, J., Dale, V. H. M., Gardiner, K., & Fischbacher-Smith, M. (2017). Student transitions to blended learning; An institutional case study. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 5(2), 58-65. doi:https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v5i2.273
Adekola, J., Dale, V. H. M., Gardiner, K., Murray, J.-A., & Fischbacher-Smith, M. (2017). Institutional and student transitions to into blended learning. Paper presented at the 3rd International Enhancement in Higher Education Conference: Inspiring excellence - transforming the student experience, Glasgow. http://www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/pages/docdetail/docs/paper/5-4-1-institutional-and-student-transitions-into-enhanced-blended-learning
Ali, W. (2020). Online and remote learning in higher education institutes: A necessity in light of COVID-19 pandemic. Higher Education Studies, 10(3), 16-25. doi:https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v10n3p16
Barber, M., Bird, L., Fleming, J., Titterington-Giles, E., Edwards, E., & Layland, C. (2021). Gravity assist: Propelling higher education towards a brighter future.
Bennett, L. (2014). Putting in more: emotional work in adopting online tools in teaching and learning practices. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(8), 919-930. doi:10.1080/13562517.2014.934343
Cousin, G. (2009). Chapter 5. Semi-structured interviews. In Researching Learning in Higher Education: An Introduction to Contemporary Methods and Approaches (pp. 71-92). New York & Abingdon: Routledge.
Dale, V. H. M. (2014). UCL E-Learning Evaluation Toolkit. Retrieved from http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1462309/
Dale, V. H. M., & Singer, J. (2019). Learner experiences of a blended course incorporating a MOOC on Haskell functional programming. Research in Learning Technology, 27. doi:https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v27.2248
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2013). Institutional change and leadership associated with blended learning innovation: Two case studies. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 24-28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.001
Gordon, N. (2014). Flexible Pedagogies: Technology Enhanced Learning. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/flexible-pedagogies-technology-enhanced-learning
Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 4-14. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003
Jokinen, P., & Mikkonen, I. (2013). Teachers' experiences of teaching in a blended learning environment. Nurse Education in Practice, 13(6), 524-528. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2013.03.014
Kerr, J., Houston, S., Marks, L., & Richford, A. (2015). Building and Executing MOOCs. A Practical Review of Glasgow's First Two MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses). Project Report. University of Glasgow, Glasgow. Retrieved from http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/112764/
Killen, C., & Langer-Crame, M. (2020). Student digital experience insights survey 2020: UK higher education (HE) survey findings. Retrieved from https://www.jisc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/student-dei-he-report-2020.pdf
Kubincova, E., Dale, V. H. M., & Kerr, J. (2018). How a MOOC can effectively facilitate student transitions to an online distance postgraduate programme. Research in Learning Technology, 26. doi:https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.2055
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Moskal, P., Dziuban, C., & Hartman, J. (2013). Blended learning: A dangerous idea? The Internet and Higher Education, 18(7), 15-23. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.001
Nordmann, E., Horlin, C., Hutchison, J., Murray, J.-A., Robson, L., Seery, M., & MacKay, J. (2020). 10 simple rules for supporting a temporary online pivot in higher education. doi:doi:10.31234/osf.io/qdh25
Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Bodily, R. G., & Sandberg, D. S. (2016). A qualitative analysis of institutional drivers and barriers to blended learning adoption in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 17-27. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.08.003
Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. A., & Welch, K. R. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers & Education, 75, 185-195. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.011
Ryan, F., Coughlan, M., & Cronin, P. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 2: qualitative research. British journal of nursing, 16(12), 738-745. doi:https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2007.16.12.23726
Taylor, J. A., & Newton, D. (2013). Beyond blended learning: A case study of institutional change at an Australian regional university. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 54-60. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.10.003
Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237-246. doi:10.1177/1098214005283748
VanDerLinden, K. (2014). Blended learning as transformational institutional learning. New Directions for Higher Education, 2014(165), 75-85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20085

Downloads

Published

2021-08-05

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021): JPAAP Vol 9, No 2 (2021) - Special Issue, Transitions to Remote and Blended Learning

Section

Original Research

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.