Academic Development during Pandemic: A Staged Approach
Keywords:academic development, online learning and teaching, appreciative inquiry, collaboration, communities of practice
In considering the impact on Learning and Teaching of the move to Technology Enabled Education (TEE) in response to the pandemic, the University of Stirling commissioned a report to establish priorities for future learning spaces and practices. Reporting in December 2020, the Sustainable Learning and Teaching @ Stirling project reflected on the progress made since March and provided recommendations for future developments. The project made use of a forward-looking approach influenced by Appreciative Inquiry (Cooperrider & Srivastva, 1987) as a method of evaluation based on success, enhancement and progress.
The report highlighted the early adopters at Stirling: an expert core of staff within Academic Development and Learning Technology who designed, created and delivered a coherent programme of staff development activities and resources (Supporting Online Learning and Teaching at Stirling - SOLT) to support colleagues in developing or re-developing learning and teaching materials for Autumn 2020. This core also created and cultivated new communities of practice: Faculty Champions (academic staff) to share best practice, and Students as Partners in Learning to provide meaningful feedback to staff on online modules prior to the semester starting.
This paper looks forward from the report: exploring the impact, challenges and opportunities for academic developers and considering in particular what a possible narrative of ‘Stirlingness’ might look like. We are often there – on the sidelines (Green & Little, 2013) - working with others to shape a community of practice in supporting learning and teaching but what is our narrative in all of this? As two academic developers who shaped and developed the institutional approach described here, we will draw on the method of ‘dialogic play script form’ (Wyatt & Gale, 2018) to explore our own perspectives on the sudden and transformative enhancement process we have experienced this year. We aim to show future opportunities for academic development, with potential value in and for the changing role of the academic developer (Bamber, 2020).
Bamber, V. (2020). Our Days Are Numbered: Metrics, Managerialism, and Academic Development. London: SEDA.
Becher, T. & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. London: Routledge.
Carsten, M., Uhi-Bien, M., West, B., Patera, J., & McGregor, R. (2010). Exploring social constructions of followership: A qualitative study. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 543-562.
Cooperrider, D., Sorenson Jr., P., Whitney, D., & Yager, T. (2000). Appreciative Inquiry: Rethinking human organization toward a positive theory of change. Champaign, IL: Stripes Publishing
Cooperrider, D., & Srivastva, S. (1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. In W. Pasmore & R. Woodman (Eds.), Research in organization change and development, Vol. 1, (pp. 129 – 169). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Gravett, K. & Ajjawi, R. (2021). Belonging as situated practice. Studies in Higher Education, Ahead of Print, 1 – 11, Retrieved 26 February, 2021, DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2021.1894118
Green, D. & Little, D. (2013). Academic Development on the Margins. Studies in Higher Education, 38(4), 523-537.
Greenleaf, R.K. (1977). Servant-leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. New York: Paulist Press.
Hodges. C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., Bond, A. (2020). The Difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. Retrieved 25 March, 2021, from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
JISC. (2021). Visons: Learning and Teaching Reimagined. Retrieved 25 March, 2021, from https://www.jisc.ac.uk/learning-and-teaching-reimagined/visions
Jones, J. & Masika, R. (2021) Appreciative inquiry as a developmental research approach for higher education pedagogy: space for the shadow. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(2), 279-292.
Kelly, A. (2015). Intimacy and emotional labour in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 20(1), 93-104. Retrieved 29 March 2021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2014.999075
Kolomitro, K., Kenny, N. & Le-May Sheffield, S. (2020). A call to action: exploring and responding to educational developers’ workplace burnout and well-being in higher education. International Journal for Academic Development, 25(1), 5-18, Retrieved 25 March, 2021, DOI: 10.1080/1360144X.2019.1705303
Laksov, K. & McGrath, C. (2020). Failure as a catalyst for learning: towards deliberate reflection in academic development work. International Journal for Academic Development, 25(1), 1-4. Retrieved 25 March, 2021, DOI: 10.1080/1360144X.2020.1717783
Macfarlane, B. (2016). Freedom to Learn: The threat to student academic freedom and why it needs to be reclaimed. London: Routledge
McGowan, S. & Felten, P. (2021). On the necessity of hope in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, Retrieved 25 March, 2021, DOI: 10.1080/1360144X.2021.1903902
Nordmann, E., Horlin, C., Hutchison, J., Murray, J.A. & Robson, L. (2020). Ten simple rules for supporting a temporary online pivot in higher education. PLOS Computational Biology 16(10), Retrieved 25 March, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008242
Salmon, G. (2020). Covid-19 is the pivot point for online learning. Wonk HE. Retrieved 25 March, 2021, from https://wonkhe.com/blogs/covid-19-is-the-pivot-point-for-online-learning
Sheen, M., Tennant, D., Kuschevatzky, A., Teperman, C. & Iles, G. (Executive Producers). (2020 – 2021). Staged [TV Series]. BBC One.
Spears, L. (2010). Character and Servant Leadership: Ten Characteristics of Effective, Caring Leaders. The Journal of Virtues and Leadership, 1(1), 25-30.
University of South Florida (2021). Teaching Dual Audiences. Retrieved 25 March, 2021, from https://www.usf.edu/atle/teaching/teaching-dual-audiences.aspx
White, A. (2021). Upskill fatigue: will hybrid and hyflex tip academics over the edge? Times Higher Education. Retrieved 25 March, 2021, from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/opinion/upskill-fatigue-will-hybrid-and-hyflex-tip-academics-over-edge
Wyatt, J. & Gale, K. (2018). Writing to it: Creative engagements with writing practice in and with the not yet known in today’s academy. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 31(2), 119-129.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.