What Question? Enabling Dialogue Between Students and their Teachers

Authors

  • Anna Katherine Wood, Dr University Edinburgh
  • Paul Anderson, Dr University Edinburgh
  • Hamish Macleod, Dr
  • Jessie Patterson, Dr University Edinburgh
  • Chrstine Sinclair, Dr University of Edinburgh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.324

Keywords:

questions, dialogue, student/teacher relationships, conversations, thematic analysis

Abstract

Conversations between academics and students play a central part in teaching and learning at university level and effective dialogues are key to academic success. An essential feature of these dialogues is the question which triggers the interaction. However, we note that students are often reluctant to ask questions and that teachers and students sometimes talk at cross-purposes. The aim of this project was to explore, through semi-structured interviews, what happens in dialogues between teachers and students in learning contexts. Our initial results give insights into the barriers to effective dialogue, the conditions that promote dialogues as well as the strategies that can be employed by teachers and students to encourage good dialogues.

 

Author Biographies

  • Paul Anderson, Dr, University Edinburgh

    Paul Anderson is a Senior Research Fellow with the School of Informatics at Edinburgh University. In addition to his Informatics research, he is particularly interested in the teaching of computer programming. Email dcspaul@ed.ac.uk.

  • Hamish Macleod, Dr

    Hamish Macleod is an Honorary Fellow in the Centre for Research in Digital Education, Moray House School of Education, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 8AQ. He is a past teacher on the MSc in Digital Education with particular interests in narrative, and game-informed, approaches in learning. Email : H.A.Macleod@ed.ac.uk.

  • Jessie Patterson, Dr, University Edinburgh

    Jessie Paterson is a Lecturer in Student Learning at the Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9RG. Email: jessie.paterson@ed.ac.uk. Special interests include: student academic support, professional skills and staff development

  • Chrstine Sinclair, Dr, University of Edinburgh

    Christine Sinclair is Programme Co-Director for the MSc in Digital Education, Moray House School of Education, St John’s Land, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 8AQ. Email: Christine.Sinclair@ed.ac.uk. She is particularly interested in dialogic approaches to teaching, student experience, and academic writing, all with a special emphasis on digital environments.

References

Alexander, R. (2006). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. Dialogos York. Retrieved from http://archive.teachfind.com/ttv/static.teachers.tv/shared/files/11117.doc
Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (2014). Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other. Routledge: Abingdon.
doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315042565
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cheng, X. (2000). Asian students’ reticence revisited. System, 28(3), 435–446.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00015-4
Dillon, J. T. (1988). Questioning and Teaching. A Manual of Practice. London: Croom Helm.
Hagenauer, G., & Volet, S. E. (2014). Teacher–student relationship at university: an important yet under-researched field. Oxford Review of Education, 40(3), 370–388.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2014.921613
Maskill, R., & Pedrosa de Jesus, H. (1997). Asking model questions. EDUCATION IN CHEMISTRY-LONDON-, 34(5), 132–134.
Pedrosa-de-Jesus, H., da Silva Lopes, B., Moreira, A., & Watts, M. (2012). Contexts for questioning: two zones of teaching and learning in undergraduate science. Higher Education, 64(4), 557–571.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9512-9
Rop, C. J. (2002). The meaning of student inquiry questions: A teacher’s beliefs and responses. International Journal of Science Education, 24(7), 717–736.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110095294
Teixeira-Dias, J. J., Pedrosa de Jesus, H., Neri de Souza, F., & Watts, M. (2005). Teaching for quality learning in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 27(9), 1123–1137.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500102813
Turpen, C., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2010). The construction of different classroom norms during Peer Instruction: Students perceive differences. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 6(2), 020123.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020123
Watts, M., & de Jesus, H. P. (2007). Asking questions in classroom science. In Science education for gifted learners (pp. 128–143). Routledge: Abingdon.
Wegerif, R. (2013). Dialogic: Education for the Internet age. Routledge: Abingdon.
Wood, A. K., Galloway, R. K., Hardy, J., & Sinclair, C. M. (2014). Analyzing learning during Peer Instruction dialogues: A resource activation framework. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 10(2), 020107.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020107
Wood, A. K., Galloway, R. K., Sinclair, C., & Hardy, J. (2018). Teacher-student discourse in active learning lectures: case studies from undergraduate physics. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–17.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1421630

Downloads

Published

2018-09-05

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2018): JPAAP Vol 6, No 2

Section

On the Horizon

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.