Exploring Social Integration of Sport Students during the Transition to University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v5i2.284Keywords:
retention, social integration, sport, student engagement, transitionAbstract
This paper outlines findings from a study exploring student experiences of their transition and social integration during the first semester of a sport programme at a post 1992 University in the North of England. The study was implemented due to an issue with retention across the sport degree programmes and the knowledge that whilst a student’s decision to withdraw from university is multifaceted, it is influenced by factors relating to a lack of social integration, including homesickness and difficulties in making new friends (Thomas, 2002). A failure or lack of opportunity to socially integrate can also negatively impact the opening months of a student’s university experience (Mackie, 1998; Wilcox, Winn, & Fyvie-Gauld, 2005). Students were engaged as partners and co-creators with academic staff throughout the study: second year peer mentors undertook qualitative interviews with first year students, which focused on the students’ experiences of the transition to university, the importance of social integration, including barriers and facilitators and the role sport may play towards this process. Nine first year students were interviewed. Findings and best practice which may assist academic and support staff in maximising the overall university student experience are presented. Implications to aid effective university policy and practice to improve student retention, attainment and progression are discussed as well as identifying how sport can play a role as both a facilitator and barrier to developing sense of identity and belonging.
References
Berger, J. (1997). Students' sense of community in residence halls, social integration, and first-year persistence. Journal of College Student Development, 38(5), 441.
Braxton, J., & McClendon, S. (2001). The fostering of social integration and retention through institutional practice. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 3(1), 57-71.
doi: https://doi.org/10.2190/RGXJ-U08C-06VB-JK7D
Byrne, E., Brugha, R., Clarke, E., Lavelle., A., & McGarvey, A. (2015). Peer interviewing in medical education research; Experiences and perceptions of student interviewers and interviewees. British Medical Council Research Notes, 8(1), 1-11.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1484-2
Heirdsfield, A., Walker, S., & Walsh, K. (2008). Enhancing the first year experience: longitudinal perspectives on a peer mentoring scheme. In Proceedings Australian Association for Research in Education. Research impacts: Proving or improving. Australia: Fremantle
Mackie, S. (1998). Jumping the hurdles. Paper presented at Higher Education Close Up Conference. University of Central Lancashire.
Richardson, A., King, S., Garrett, R., & Wrench, A. (2012). Thriving or just surviving? Exploring student strategies for a smoother transition to university. A Practice Report. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 3(2), 87.
doi: https://doi.org/10.5204/intjfyhe.v3i2.132
Rubin, M. (2012). Social class differences in social integration among students in higher education: A meta-analysis and recommendations for future research. PLEASE CONFIRM JOURNAL Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 5, 22-38
doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026162
Smith, J. (1995). Semi-structured interviewing and qualitative analysis. In J. Smith, R. Harre´ & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 9-26). London: Sage.
doi: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221792.n2
Smith, J., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretive phenomenological analysis. In J. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 51-80). London: Sage.
Sport England (2017) Sporting futures: An active nation. Sport Strategy 2017-21.
Thomas, L. (2002). Student retention in higher education: the role of institutional habitus. Journal of Education Policy, 17(4), 423-442.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930210140257
Thomas, L. (2012). Building student engagement and belonging in Higher Education at a time of change: a summary of findings and recommendations from the What Works? Student Retention & Success programme. Paul Hamlyn Foundation and the Higher Education Academy.
Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of educational research, 45(1), 89-125.
doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543045001089
Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. (1st Ed.). University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
Tinto, V. (2010). From theory to action: Exploring the institutional conditions for student retention. In J. Smart (Ed.). Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 51-89). Springer Netherlands.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8598-6_2
Wilcox, P., Winn, S., & Fyvie‐Gauld, M. (2005). ‘It was nothing to do with the university, it was just the people’: The role of social support in the first‐year experience of higher education. Studies in higher education, 30(6), 707-722.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500340036
Woodfield, R. (2014). Undergraduate retention and attainment across the disciplines. Higher Education Academy.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
