Where Facebook Meets Plagiarism: An Investigation and an Intervention

Authors

  • Heather Alison McQueen Edinburgh University
  • Cathy Shields University of Edinburgh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v5i3.260

Keywords:

Facebook, plagiarism, co-creation, open educational resource.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE
Closed (student only) Facebook groups are commonplace amongst students and the social and academic benefits of such groups are well studied. The exclusion of staff from these Facebook groups could conceivably lead to inappropriate behaviour such as plagiarism but the occurrence of this is unknown. Many students have a poor understanding of what constitutes plagiarism, or the rationale for its avoidance (other than to avoid penalty). In this study we sought to explore the behaviours of students on Facebook groups, focusing on plagiarism. We also broadened our analysis to encompass an investigation of general plagiarism awareness in order to use the findings to inform the co-creation of a simple plagiarism intervention tool for use on Facebook groups.

METHODS
Our mixed methods approach encompassed seven student focus groups and a survey of 273 students at one UK University, as well as consultation of 11 HEI staff. Information and ideas drawn from the investigative phase of the project informed the design and co-creation of a plagiarism avoidance video resource.

RESULTS AND LESSONS LEARNED
We did not find plagiarism on Facebook to be a major concern despite wide use by students of closed groups to support learning. We did, however, find that interactive discussion on Facebook was minimal, and that membership was non-inclusive, and therefore suggest caution towards formal use of Facebook in learning. We also found that >40% of our students held misconceptions and anxieties about what constitutes plagiarism and about how to avoid it, and that University guidelines on plagiarism are not improving understanding. Plagiarism confusion was heightened for students new to our University, although further research into the generality of this observation is required. We advocate good scholarship education that actively engages, but is not limited to, students in their first year of study, and present our own anti-plagiarism tool that is suitable for deployment via Facebook groups.

Author Biographies

  • Heather Alison McQueen, Edinburgh University

    Heather McQueen is a senior lecturer in molecular genetics at the University of Edinburgh. She held the role of College Academic Misconduct Officer for the College of Science and Engineering at the University of Edinburgh from 2011-16. She is currently seconded to the Institute of Academic Development at the University of Edinburgh. Email: h.mcqueen@ed.ac.uk

  • Cathy Shields, University of Edinburgh

    Cathy Shields is a Learning Technologist at the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, formerly of the University of Edinburgh, with an interest in how students learn through online interaction. Email: c.shields@rbge.ac.uk

References

Aaen, J., & Dalsgaard, C. (2016). Student Facebook groups as a third space: between social life and schoolwork. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 160-186.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1111241

Bateman, D., & Willems, J. (2012). Facing off: Facebook and higher education. Misbehaviour Online in Higher Education: Cutting-edge Technologies in Higher Education, 5, 53-79.

Boyd, D. (2014). It's complicated: The social lives of networked teens. USA: Yale University Press.

Breen, L., & Maassen, M. (2005). Reducing the incidence of plagiarism in an undergraduate course: the role of education. Issues in Educational Research, 15(1), 1-16.

Cheung, C. M., Chiu, P. Y., & Lee, M. K. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1337-1343.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.028

Dee, T. S., & Jacob, B. A. (2012). Rational ignorance in education a field experiment in student plagiarism. Journal of Human Resources, 47(2), 397-434.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2012.0012

Escobar, O. (2011). Public dialogue and deliberation: A communication perspective for public engagement practitioners. Retrieved from; http://www.academia.edu/1131712/Public_Dialogue_and_Deliberation_A_Communication_Perspective_for_Public_Engagement_Practitioners

Gullifer, J., & Tyson, G. A. (2010). Exploring university students' perceptions of plagiarism: A focus group study. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 463-481.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903096508

Gullifer, J. M., & Tyson, G. A. (2014). Who has read the policy on plagiarism? Unpacking students' understanding of plagiarism. Studies in Higher Education, 39(7), 1202-1218.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.777412

Hayes, N. (2000) Doing Psychological Research. Philadelphia: PA: Open University Press.

Howard, R. M., & Davies, L. J. (2009). Plagiarism in the Internet age. Educational Leadership, 66(6), 64-67.

Irwin, C., Ball, L., Desbrow, B., & Leveritt, M. (2012). Students’ perceptions of using Facebook as an interactive learning resource at university. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1221-1232.

doi: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.798

Jones, I. S., Blankenship, D., & Hollier, G. (2013). Am I Cheating? An Analysis of Online Students' Perceptions of Their Behaviors and Attitudes. Psychology Research, 3(5), 261-269.

Kent, M. (2013). Changing the conversation: Facebook as a venue for online class discussion in higher education. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(4), 546-565.

Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook® and academic performance. Computers in human behavior, 26(6), 1237-1245.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024

Madge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J., & Hooley, T. (2009). Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university:‘It is more for socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work’. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 141-155.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880902923606

Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2013). Is it a tool suitable for learning? A critical review of the literature on Facebook as a technology‐enhanced learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 487-504.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12007

McCarthy, J. (2010). Blended learning environments: Using social networking sites to enhance the first year experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 729-740.

doi: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1039

McCarthy, J. (2012). International design collaboration and mentoring for tertiary students through Facebook. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(5), 755-775.

doi: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1383

Nkhoma, M., Cong, H. P., Au, B., Lam, T., Richardson, J., Smith, R., & El-Den, J. (2015). Facebook as a tool for learning purposes: Analysis of the determinants leading to improved students’ learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 16(2), 87-101.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787415574180

Power, L. G. (2009) University Students’ Perceptions of Plagiarism. The Journal of Higher Education, 80, 643-662.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0073

Prescott, J. (2014). Teaching style and attitudes towards Facebook as an educational tool. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15(2), 117-128.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787414527392

Roblyer, M. D., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J., & Witty, J. V. (2010). Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. The Internet and higher education, 13(3), 134-140.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.03.002

Selwyn, N. (2009). Faceworking: exploring students' education‐related use of Facebook. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 157-174.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880902923622

Sutton, A., Taylor, D., & Johnston, C. (2014). A model for exploring student understandings of plagiarism. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 38(1), 129-146.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2012.706807

Timmis, S. (2012). Constant companions: Instant messaging conversations as sustainable supportive study structures amongst undergraduate peers. Computers & Education, 59(1), 3-18.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.026

Turnitin.com (2013). Turnitin - Top 15 Misconceptions About Turnitin. [Weblog]. Retrieved 7 July 2016, from http://turnitin.com/en_us/resources/blog/421-general/1644-top-15-misconceptions-about-turnitin

Turnitin. (2013) White Paper | the Sources in Student Writing – Higher Education. Retrieved 3 March 2015, from http://go.turnitin.com/paper/highered/sources-student-writing

Walker, J. (2010). Measuring plagiarism: Researching what students do, not what they say they do. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 41-59.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902912994

Wilkinson, S. (2008) Focus Groups. In: Smith, J., ed., Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods, 2nd ed. London: Sage, pp. 186-206.

Willems, J., & Bateman, D. (2011). The potentials and pitfalls of social networking sites such as Facebook in higher education contexts. Changing demands, changing directions. Proceedings ascilite Hobart, 1322-1324. Retrieved from; http://www.ascilite.org/conferences/hobart11/downloads/papers/Willems-poster.pdf

Wise, L. Z., Skues, J., & Williams, B. (2011). Facebook in higher education promotes social but not academic engagement. Changing demands, changing directions. Proceedings ascilite Hobart, 1332-1342. Retrieved from; http://www.ascilite.org/conferences/hobart11/downloads/papers/Wise-full.pdf

Wright, F., White, D., Hirst, T., & Cann, A. (2014). Visitors and Residents: mapping student attitudes to academic use of social networks. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 126-141.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.777077

Downloads

Published

2017-06-05

Issue

Section

Original Research