External Examination Invigilators’ (EEIs) Beliefs and Inference About Activities They Consider Important: Implication for Examination Policy
Keywords:External Examination Invigilator, Exam Invigilation, Belief, Role, Proctor, Secondary Schools
The aim of this small-scale grounded approach qualitative study was to examine the beliefs of selected external examination invigilators (EEIs) and infer the kinds of activities they consider important. The importance of this study rested in the fact that there is a paucity of research which examines the role of EEIs at secondary, further and higher education levels. Therefore, it aids in filling a literary gap and gives them a ‘voice’ in the research literature. Study participants were five EEIs, working in a London secondary school. Purposeful convenience or opportunity sampling was used in their selection. Informal interviews and participant observation were the research methods used. The findings revealed the fact that beliefs of the EEIs guide how they rated their role and that maintaining examination intangibles and procedures is of high importance. Implication of the findings are discussed.
Borg, M. (2001). Key concepts in ELT. Teachers' beliefs. ELT Journal, [online] 55(2), pp.186-188. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.2.186 [Accessed 26 Jan. 2017].
Bouville, M. (2008). The Obsession with exam fairness. [Online] Available at: Article available at http://www.mathieu.bouville.name/education-ethics/Bouville-exam-fairness.pdf [Accessed 26 Jan. 2017].
Bush, T. (2002). Authenticity--reliability, validity and triangulation. In: M. Coleman and A. Briggs, Ed,
Research methods in Educational leadership and management. London: Paul Chapman: sage.
Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of Grounded Theory: Theories of qualitative research. Mill Valley: The Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity. Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley: The Sociology Press.
Guba, E.G. and Lincoln, Y.S. (1998). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N.K Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, Eds. The Landscape of qualitative research theories and issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 195-220
Hoffman, B. (2015). The 5 most powerful self-beliefs that ignite human behavior. [Online] Elsevier Connect. Available at: https://www.elsevier.com/connect/the-5-most-powerful-self-beliefs-that-ignite-human-behavior [Accessed 26 Jan. 2017].
James, R. (2016). Tertiary student attitudes to invigilated, online summative examinations. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, [online] 13(1). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0015-0 [Accessed 26 Jan. 2017].
LaRossa, R. (2005). Grounded Theory Methods and Qualitative Family Research. Journal of Marriage and Family 67. (4), 837-857
Lilley, M., Meere, J. and Baker, T. (2016). Remote Live Invigilation: A Pilot Study. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, [online] 2016(1). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/jime.408 [Accessed 26 Jan. 2017].
Mohmad Kahar, M. and Kendall, G. (2013). Universiti Malaysia Pahang examination timetabling problem: scheduling invigilators. Journal of the Operational Research Society, [online] 65(2), pp.214-226. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jors.2012.6 [Accessed 26 Jan. 2017].
National Union of Teachers (2006). Guidance on New Arrangements for Exam invigilation. [Online] Available at: https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=ms-android-samsung,national union of teachers’ guidance on new arrangements for exam invigilation [Accessed 26 Jan. 2017].
Robson, C. (2007). How to do a research project, a guide for undergraduate students. Malden USA: Blackwell Publishing.
School teachers' pay and conditions document, (2005). Section 4 guidance on changes to the document resulting from the national agreement. http://Web archive.nationalatchives.gov.uk/20061023165013/http://teacher net.gov.uk/docbank/index.cfm?id=.
Shepherd, J. (2010). Exams come to the bedroom with new invigilation software. The guardian. [Online] Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/education/2010/jun/08/exams-bedroom-invigilation-software.
The workforce agreement monitoring group, (2005). Invigilation resource pack-strategy overview and good practice guidance. Time for standards transforming the school workforce. [Online] Available at: Http://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownloa/NRT00652005PART2.pdf.
The Ridgeway School Examination Invigilator job description, (2012). Retrieved from: https://www.eteach.com/DataFiles/VacDocs/9751/511643/Exam%20Invigilator%20Job%20Description.pdf.
Thomas, C. (2012). How Underlying Beliefs Affect Behavior (The Effects of Coaching) -. [Online] International Coach Academy. Available at: http://coachcampus.com/coach-portfolios/research-papers/crystal-thomasresearch-paper-how-underlying-beliefs-affect-behavior-the-effects-of-coaching/ [Accessed 26 Jan. 2017].
Vlaardingerbroek, B., Shehab, S. and Alameh, S. (2011). The problem of open cheating and invigilator compliance in the Lebanese Brevet and Baccalauréat examinations. International Journal of Educational Development, [online] 31(3), pp.297-302. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2010.03.002 [Accessed 26 Jan. 2017].
Wikipedia, (2016). Exam invigilator. [Online] En.m.wikipedia.org. Available at: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exam_invigilator [Accessed 26 Jan. 2017]
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.