Linking Reflective Activities for Self-managed Development of Higher-level Abilities
Keywords:reflection, linking, higher-level abilities, self-managed learning, ePortfolio
The writer suggests that the potential of the available range of critically analysed and widely practiced approaches to reflection could generally be better realised. The case is made in relation to the purposeful development of higher-level abilities in higher education, which are increasingly important for employers and learners. In courses where such development is deemed a priority, the writer advocates the structured and self-managed linking of integrated reflective activities, based upon an ePortfolio, which can readily accommodate and accumulate linked digital materials of various types and forms without effort devoted to rewriting. Four common approaches to reflection by learners are outlined and amplified through descriptions of their use, to illustrate the type of outcomes they can generate and their usefulness if linked to other reflections. It is argued that logical course design should structure complementary tasks contributing linked entries to an ePortfolio, so that the affordances of their separate contributions to learning and development are realised.
Anon. (1981). Education for capability: Details of the Royal Society of Arts Recognition Scheme. Industrial and Commercial Training, 13, 14-21.
Beetham, H. (2005). e-portfolios in post-16 learning in the UK; developments, issues and opportunites. JISC, e-learning and pedagogy strand. JISC.
Brockbank, A., & McGill, I. (2007). Facilitating Reflective Learning in Higher Education. (2nd Edn). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Cowan, J. (2006). On Becoming an Innovative University Teacher. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Cowan, J. (2014). Noteworthy matters for attention in reflective journal writing. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15(1), 53-64.
Cowan, J., & Cherry, D. (2012). The learner's role in assessing higher level abilities. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 6(1), 12-22.
Cowan, J., & Stroud, R. (2016). Composting reflections for development. Reflective Practice, 17(1), 27-33.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Boston, MA: D C Heath and Co.
Francis, H., & Cowan, J. (2008). Fostering an action-research dynamic amongst student practitioners. Journal of European Industrial Training, 32(5), 336-346.
Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by Doing. Further Education Unit. Sheffield: Further Education Unit.
JISC. (2008). Effective Practice with e-Portfolios. HEFCE, JISC Innovation Group. Bristol: JISC.
Joyes, G., Gray, L., & Hartnell-Young, E. (2010). Effective practice with e-portfolios: How can the UK experience inform implementation? Australian
Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 15-27.
Landis, C., Scott, S., & Kahn, S. (2015). Examining the Role of Reflection in ePortfolios. International Journal of ePortfolio, 5(2), 107-121.
Moon, J. (1999). Reflection in learning and professional development. Abingdon: Routledge.
Moon, J. (2004). A handbook of reflective and experiential learning. London, UK: RoutledgeFalmer.
O'Connell, T., & Dyment, J. (2011). The case of reflective journals; Is the jury still out? Reflective Practice, 12(1), 47-59.
Pask, G. (1975). The Cybernetics of Human Learning and Performance. London: Hutchinson.
Rainier, T. (1978). The New Diary. North Tyde. NSW, Australia: Angus and Robertson Publishers.
Rogers, R. (2001, Fall). Reflection in higher education: a concept analuysis. Innovative Higher Education, 26(1), 37-57.
Rose, E. (2013). On reflection: An essay on education, technology and the status of thought in the twenty-first century. Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press.
Rose, E. (2016). Reflection in asynchronous online postsecondary courses: a reflective review of the literature. Reflective Practice, 17(6).
Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner - How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
Stefani, L., Mason, R., & Pegler, C. (2007). The educational potential of e-portfolios: Supporting personal development planning and reflective learning. London: Routledge.
Van Manem, M. (1991). The Tact of Teaching. New York: The State of New York Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Watson, G., & Gallagher, K. (2005). Managing for Results. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.
Weedon, E., & Cowan, J. (2005). The Kolb Cycle, reflection and all that... In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving Student Learning - ten years on. OCLSD.
Yancey, K. (2009). Reflection and electronic portfolio: Inventing the self and reinventing the university. In D. Cambridge, B. Cambridge, & K. Yancey, Electronic portfolios 2.0: Emergent research on implementation and impact. (pp. 5-16). Sterling, VA, USA: Stylus.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.