Doctoral Supervision Practice: What’s the Problem and How Can We Help Academics?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v5i1.235Keywords:
Doctoral supervision seminars, discipline-specific versus generic, supervision challengesAbstract
Academics are feeling squeezed by increasing research supervision demands within tightening time constraints. In a changing higher education environment, demands on doctoral supervisors need to be better understood in order to provide them with the right support at supervision pressure points. As academic developers, our aim was to better understand supervision challenges across multiple disciplines. A two stage study firstly sought differences in research and supervision practice between faculties by means of an anonymised digital questionnaire [n226]. Twenty-two questions explored supervisors’ experiences of project management, communication and writing. Secondly, we interviewed 11 experienced supervisors from disciplines other than our own (education), focusing on supervision’s discipline-specific challenges and constraints. We expected to find discipline-differences between science and humanities.
However, analysis showed that supervision challenges are the same across disciplines. We report on what these entail and argue that, as graduate numbers rise in an internationalised academy, supervision support can and should be developed centrally in order to address the growing pressures on faculty.
References
Ali, A., & Kohun, F. (2007). Dealing with social isolation to minimize doctoral attrition: A four stage framework. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 2, 33-49.
Aitchison, C. (2015). Writing the practice/practise the writing: Writing challenges and pedagogies for creative practice supervisors and researchers. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(12), 1291-1303.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1035629
Aitchison, C. & Guerin, C. (2014). Writing Groups for Doctoral Education and Beyond: Innovations in Theory and Practice. Routledge: London & New York.
Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines (2nd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Bishop, J. (2006). The Bologna Process and Australia: Next steps. Retrieved from http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/higher_education/publications_resources/profiles/Bologna_Process_and_Australia.htm
Brown, P., Hesketh, A., & Williams, S. (2004). The mismanagement of talent: Employability and jobs in the knowledge economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199269532.001.0001
Carrigan, M. (19 March, 2016). Notes on the uberisation of the doctorate. Mark Carrigan blog site, viewed 18 May 2016 at https://markcarrigan.net/2016/03/19/notes-on-the-uberisation-of-doctoral-education/
Carter, S. (2016). Supervision learning as threshold crossing: when supervision gets ‘medieval.’ Higher Education Research Development. Available at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07294360.2016.1160875?journalCode=cher20
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1160875
Carter, Fazey, Geraldo, & Trevitt. (2010). The doctorate of the Bologna Process third cycle: Mapping the dimensions and impact of the European Higher Education Area. Journal of Research in International Education, 9(3), 245-258.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240910379383
Carter, S. & Laurs, D. (2014). Developing Generic Support for Doctoral Students: Practice and Pedagogy. Routledge: Oxon, UK.
Chan, W. W. Y., & Dimmock, C. (2008). The internationalization of universities: Globalist, internationalist and translocalist models. Journal of Research in International Education, 7(2), 184-202.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240908091304
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 39(1), 1-38. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/6.435/www/Dempster77.pdf
Golde, C. M., & Walker, G. E. (Eds.) (2006). Envisioning the future of doctoral education: Preparing stewards of the discipline. Walden: Wiley.
Grant, B., & Barrow, M. (2013). Fashioning docile teacher bodies? The strange space of the ‘staff teaching seminar’. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(4), 306-317.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2012.688208
Guerin, C. (2016). Connecting the dots: Writing a doctoral thesis by publication. In: C. Badenhorst & C. Guerin (Eds), Research literacies and writing pedagogies for masters and doctoral writers (pp. 31-50). Brill: Leiden.
Guerin, C., Carter, S. & Aitchison, C. (2015). Blogging as learning community: Lessons for academic development? International Journal of Academic Development. Available at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1042480.
Harris, S. (2006). Rethinking academic identities in neo-liberal times. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(4), 421-433.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510500238986
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.
IBM Corporation. (2015). IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 22) [Computer software]. Armonk: IBM Corporation.
Kiley, M., & Wisker, G. (2009). Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(4), 431-441.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903067930
Murray, R. (2015a) Writing in Social Spaces: A Social Processes Approach to Academic Writing. London: Society for Research into Higher Education-Routledge.
Murray R (2015b) Writing for academic journals – How can a structured writing retreat help? Wiley Exchanges Open Access. http://exchanges.wiley.com/blog/2015/09/17/writing-for-publication-how-can-a-structured-writing-retreat-help.
Murray, R. & Newton, M. (2009) Writing retreat as structured intervention: margin or mainstream?, Higher Education Research and Development, 28(5), 527-539.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903154126
Nerad, M., & Evans, B. (2014). Globalization and its impact on the quality of PhD education: Forces and forms in doctoral education worldwide. Rotterdam: Sense.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-569-4
Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2007). Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language: A handbook for supervisors. New York: Routledge.
Park, C. (2007). Defining the doctorate: Discussion paper. York: The Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/redefining_the_doctorate.pdf
Ravelli, L., Paltridge, B., Starfield, S., & Tuckwell, K. (2013). Extending the notion of text: The visual and performing arts doctoral thesis. Visual Communication, 12(4), 395-422.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357212462663
Rothblatt, S. (2008). Global branding: The celebrity university. Liberal Education, 94(4). Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/publications-research/periodicals/global-branding-and-celebrity-university
Sewell, K., & Poutasi, K. (2008). New Zealand and the Bologna Process. Wellington: Ministry of Education and New Zealand Qualifications Authority.
Walker, M., & Nixon, J. (2004). Reclaiming universities from a runaway world. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
Wilson, D. B. (2001). Effect Size Determination Program (Version 2.0) [Excel Macro Application]. College Park: University of Maryland.
Wingate, U. (2006). Doing away with ‘study skills.’ Teaching in Higher Education, 11(4), 457-469.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600874268
Winter, R., Griffiths, M., & Green, K. (2000). The ‘academic’ qualities of practice: What are the criteria for a practice-based PhD? Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 25-37.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
