Using Breakout Rooms in Synchronous Online Tutorials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v4i3.216Keywords:
breakout rooms, Blackboard Collaborate, online tutorials, small group work, interactionAbstract
This paper describes a small-scale, practitioner-led study of the use of breakout rooms for small group work in synchronous online tutorials using the Blackboard Collaborate tool. The project draws on the writer’s own experience of using breakout rooms in online tutorials over a period of 10 months, both as a tutor of two health and social care undergraduate modules and as a student of modules in a different faculty. It also draws on the experience of tutor colleagues.
The project identifies three main benefits of using breakout rooms. Firstly, they are a useful tool for facilitating collaborative learning and interaction. Interaction takes on particular significance in online tutorials. In a face-to-face session the tutor can see if a student’s attention has wandered and gauge their response to the session. In contrast, a student can log into an online tutorial room and appear to be fully engaged with a lecture style session, whilst actually doing many other things and learning little. Interaction in an online tutorial also provides students learning at a distance with a rare opportunity for peer-to-peer contact, which can be invaluable in building relationships and confidence. Further benefits are identified in terms of empowering students to contribute to the session plan and content and also giving the tutor a break from presenting.
Perceived barriers to breakout room use are identified around technical difficulties, small numbers of students and in terms of student skill and confidence. The only significant actual barrier to breakout room use identified relates to tutor skill and confidence.
References
Alaszewski, A. (2006). Using Diaries for Social Research, London, SAGE Publications Ltd.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9780857020215
Baehr, C. (2012). Incorporating user appropriation, media richness, and collaborative knowledge sharing into blended e-learning training tutorial. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 55(2), 175-184. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2012.2190346
Cole, S., Haynes, M., Lown, J., Ulanowsky, C., & Salmon, G. (1999). Effective group work, Milton Keynes, The Open University.
Fasso, W. (2013). First Year Distance Transition Pedagogy: Synchronous online classrooms. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 4(1), 33-45.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5204/intjfyhe.v4i1.141
Fenton-O’Creevy, M., Dimitriadis, Y., & Scobie, G. (2014) Failure and resilience at boundaries: The emotional process of identity work. In E. Wenger-Trayner, M. Fenton-O’Creevy, S. Hutchinson, C. Kubiak, & B. Wenger-Trayner (eds.) Learning in Landscapes of Practice: Boundaries, identity, and knowledgeability in practice-based learning (pp.13-29). Retrieved from http://www.eblib.com
Foronda, C. & Lippincott, C. (2014). Graduate nursing students' experience with synchronous, interactive videoconferencing within online courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 15(2), 1-8.
Heiser, S., Stickler, U., & Furnborough, C. (2013). Student training in the use of an online synchronous conferencing tool. CALICO Journal, 30(2), 226-251. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.11139/cj.30.2.226-251
Kear, K., Chetwynd, F., Williams, J., & Donelan, H. (2012). Web conferencing for synchronous online tutorials: perspectives of tutors using a new medium. Computers and Education, 58(3), 953-963. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.015
Laurillard, D. (2009). The pedagogical challenges to collaborative technologies. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(1) 5-20. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-008-9056-2
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1990). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
McDonald, J. & Campbell, A. (2012). Demonstrating online teaching in the disciplines. A systematic approach to activity design for online synchronous tuition. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 883-89. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01238.x
Peacock, S., Murray, S., Dean, J., Brown, D., Girdler, S., & Mastrominico, B. (2012). Exploring tutor and student experiences in online synchronous learning environments in the performing arts. Creative Education, 3(7), 1269-1280. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.37186
Smith-Sullivan, K. (2008). Diaries and journals. In L.M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 214-216). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
doi: http://dx.doi.org.libezproxy.open.ac.uk/10.4135/9781412963909.n110
Tonsmann, G. (2014). A study of the effectiveness of Blackboard Collaborate for conducting synchronous courses at multiple locations. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 9, 54-63.
Wenger-Trayner, E. & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2014) Learning in landscapes of practice: A framework. In E. Wenger-Trayner, M. Fenton-O’Creevy, S. Hutchinson, C. Kubiak, C., & B. Wenger-Trayner (eds.) Learning in Landscapes of Practice: Boundaries, identity, and knowledgeability in practice-based learning (pp.13-29). Retrieved from http://www.eblib.com
Yamagata-Lynch, L. (2014) Blending online asynchronous and synchronous learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(2), 189-212.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.