Modernising a Classic: Updating Leeds Beckett University’s Taxonomy of Assessment Domains to Support Institutional Curricular Change
Keywords:Taxonomy of Assessment Domains, Graduate Attributes, learning outcomes
Leeds Beckett University is embarking on a new cycle of Periodic Review after our wholesale curriculum review in 2012. Reviewing our current academic activity in relation to our curricular practice showed that work still needed to be done in several key areas. For example, improving the writing of levelled intended learning outcomes (ILOs), integrating our graduate attributes (GAs) – Enterprise, Having a Global Outlook and Digital Literacy – more fully into course and module outcomes and ensuring staff understand the nature and scope of the different assessment domains which enhance opportunities for full student learning from our programmes. To address these issues, a short life working group (SLWG) focused on modernising our existing taxonomy of assessment domains (Link 1) which had been well-used by our staff for at least 20 years.
This paper focuses on i) consideration of the benefits of the existing taxonomy ii) the broader context and reasons for modifying our existing taxonomy of assessment domains, iii) the approach, process and activity of the SLWG, iv) planned future work streams to build on our work in progress.
Anderson, L., Krathwohl, D., Airasuan, P., Cruickshank, K., Mayer, R., Pintrick, P., Raths, J. & Wittrock, M. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. NY: Longman.
Biggs, J. B. and Collis K. F. (1982). Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The Solo Taxonomy, Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes, London: Academic Press.
Blaschke, L. (2012). Heutagogy and Lifelong learning: A Review of Heutagogical Practice and Self determined learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13, 1.
Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W. & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, Toronto: Longmans, Green.
Churches, A. (2008). Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy. Retrieved 14 February, 2016 from http://edorigami.wikispaces.com
Dykstra, D. I. (1992). Studying Conceptual Change in Learning Physics, Science Education, 76, 615-652.
Gilbert, S.W. (1992). Systematic Questioning: Taxonomies that Develop Critical Thinking Skills, Science Teacher, 59(9), 41-46.
Harris, J. (2008). Developing a language for assessing creativity: a Taxonomy for supporting student learning and assessment. Investigations in University Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 80-87.
Heer, R. (2012). A model of learning objectives. Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching, Iowa State University.
Heywood, J. (2000). Assessment in Higher Education. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishing.
Knowles, Z. & Gilbourne, D. (2010). Aspiration, Inspiration and Illustration: Initiating Debate on Reflective Practice Writing, The Sports Psychologist, 24, 504-520.
Leeds Beckett University Taxonomy of assessment domains. Based upon Bloom, B.S. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York, NY: David McKay. Retrieved 14 February, 2016 from https://www.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/partners/files/Taxonomy_of_assessment_domains.pdf
Merriam, S. (2001) Andragogy and Self-directed learning: Pillars Adult learning Theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 89, 3-13
Moseley, D., Baumefield, V., Elliot, J., Miller, J., Newton, D. & Gregson, M. (2005). Frameworks for Thinking, Cambridge University Press, p.4
Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) (2014). UK Quality Code for Higher Education. Part A. Setting and Maintaining Academic Standards. The Framework for Higher Education Qualifications of UK Degree Awarding Bodies.
Travers, R.M.W. (1980) Taxonomies of Educational Objectives and Theories of Classification. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2 (2), 5-23.
Veal, W.R. and MaKinster, J. G. (1999). Pedagogical Content Knowledge Taxonomies, Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3, 4.
Link 1: Original taxonomy
Link 2: Revised taxonomy
Link 3: Domains linked to graduate attributes
Link 4: Interactive tool
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.