Embedding Digital (Information) Literacy in the First Year Curriculum: An Intervention
Keywords:information literacy, digital literacy, first year, intervention, embedded.
This paper describes an intervention aimed at reducing the occurrence of common weaknesses in first level work and thereby improving student performance in assessments. The project involved developing a more systematic approach to embedding information literacy (IL) into the first year curriculum in the Carnegie Faculty at Leeds Beckett University by combining the expertise of subject librarians with that of first year tutors. It was part of a broader programme of institutional curricular change. This collaborative approach was informed by data from individual interviews with previous students and based on a dual rationale: firstly from Sadler’s (2002) call for more high impact, low stakes assessment in the first year and secondly a need to avoid creating a culture of ‘testing’ (Sambell, McDowell, & Montgomery, 2013) in which students position themselves as submitting to others’ judgments rather than developing rational autonomy (Baxter-Magolda, 2003). In other words, we needed to design an assessed activity which encouraged students to engage in learning but created a supportive and collaborative approach. The embedding process together with some of the resources and tools which we developed are described in this paper as well as the respective contributions of the various participants. We explore the impact of two years of implementation based on student interviews and tutor evaluations. Recommendations and examples are provided to demonstrate how a similar approach might work elsewhere either as a local, course-specific intervention or as part of an institution-wide approach to improving students’ digital literacy.
Baxter-Magolda, M. B. (2003). Identity and learning: Student Affairs’ role in transforming higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 44(2), 231-247.
Boud, D. (2007). Reframing assessment as if learning were important. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds) Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education (pp. 14-25). Abingdon: Routledge.
Gibbs, G.(2010). Using Assessment to Support Student Learning. Leeds: Leeds Metropolitan University
Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: linkages to ways of thinking and practicing. In C. Rust, (Ed.), Improving Student Learning - Theory and Practice Ten Years On. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development (OCSLD), pp 412-424.
Price, R., Becker, K., Clark, L., & Collins, S. (2011). Embedding information literacy in a first-year business undergraduate course. Studies in Higher Education, 36(6), 705-718.
Race, P. (2007). How to Get a Good Degree. Maidenhead: OUP
Sadler, R. (2002). Ah! So That’s Quality. In P. Schwartz, G. Webb (Eds) Assessment Case Studies, Experience and Practice from Higher Education ( pp. 130-135). London: Kogan Page.
Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Montgomery, C. (2013). Assessment for Learning in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
SCONUL (2011). The SCONUL Seven Pillars of Information Literacy: core model for higher education. Available from:
http://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/coremodel.pdf (date accessed 7 July, 2015)
Smith, K., & Hopkins, C. (2005). Great expectations. Sixth-formers perceptions of teaching and learning in degree-level English Arts and Humanities Higher Education 4(3), 304-318.
Yorke, M., & Longden, B. (2004). Retention and student success in Higher Education. Maidenhead: SRHE and Open University Press
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.