Embedding Graduate Attributes into the Undergraduate Curriculum: Reflection and Actions

Authors

  • Susan Smith Leeds Beckett University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v4i2.174

Keywords:

Curriculum, graduate attributes, reflective practice, reflective cycle, undergraduate curriculum

Abstract

Gibbs’ (1988) reflective cycle is used as a framework to explore the institutional experience of embedding new graduate attributes (GAs) as part of a major refocus of all the undergraduate courses at Leeds Beckett University. One of the key components of this curricular refocus was the initial conceptualisation and embedding of three new graduate attributes.

The University’s three GAs are

i)        having a global outlook

ii)       being enterprising and

iii)      being digitally literate.

This paper focuses on the seven main interventions which were used to embed and foster their delivery in the refocused curriculum. The GAs run through each level of every UG course and prepare students for work and life through a variety of embedded intracurricular module-based, credit-bearing activities.

This reflective paper concentrates on the intra-module core curricular activity manifested by the GAs embedded in course and module learning outcomes and not students’ extracurricular activity even though this can be regarded as strengthening skills for life and the workplace (Bowden, Hart, King, Trigwell, & Watts, 2000). A combination of personal and colleagues’ reflections, evidence from surveys and analysis of actions are highlighted using Gibbs’ (1988) cycle as a framework to explore the process in a systematic way and assist in the illustration and analysis of some of our key interventions. This reflective account considers our successes (resources and building the digital literacy GA) and some of the surprising benefits (communities of practice) of this initiative. The paper also uses Hounsell’s (2011) and Barrie’s (2006) frameworks to deconstruct the curriculum change experience and offers structured reflection on some of the lessons learnt from the challenges, e.g. tight timescales, staff ownership and constructive alignment (Biggs, 1996).

Key future actions are noted; specifically the engagement of staff and students to address application/tailoring to disciplines and their specific course design issues.

Author Biography

Susan Smith, Leeds Beckett University

I am Head of Curriculum Review & Development, an academic post at Leeds Beckett University. I'm based in the Centre for Learning and Teaching, Leeds Beckett University. I am widely published.

References

Atkins, S., and Murphy, K. (1993). Reflection: a review of the literature, Journal of Advanced Nursing. 18, 1188–1192.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1993.18081188.x

Barrie, S.C. (2003). Conceptions of generic graduate attributes: A phenomenographic investigation of academics’ understandings of generic graduate attributes in the context of contemporary university courses and teaching. (Doctoral thesis), University of Technology. Sydney.

Barrie, S.C. (2004).A research-based approach to generic graduate attributes policy. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), 261-275.

Barrie, S.C. (2006). Understanding what we mean by the generic attributes of Graduate in Higher Education. The International Journal of Higher Education and Planning. 51(2), 215-241.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0729436042000235391

Barrie, S., Hughes, C. & Smith, C. (2009). The National Graduate Attributes project: Integration and Assessment of Graduate Attributes in Curriculum. Strawberry Hills, NSW: Australian Learning and Teaching Council. Retrieved from http://www.altc.edu.au/resource-national-graduate-attributes-project-sydney-2009

Bath, D., Smith, C., Stein, S., & Swann, R. (2004). Beyond Mapping and Embedding Graduate Attributes; bringing together Quality Assurance and Action learning to create a valid and living curriculum. Higher Education Research and Development. 23(3),313-328.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0729436042000235427

Beetham, H., McGill, L., & Littlejohn, A. (2009). Thriving in the 21st Century: Learning Literacies for the Digital Age. LLiDA project, The Caledonian Academy, Glasgow Caledonian University.

Bennett, N., Dunne, E. & Carre, C. (2000). Skills Development in Higher Education and Employment. Buckingham: SHRE and Open University Press.

Bent, M. &Stubbings, R. (2011). The SCONUL seven pillars model of information literacy: 2011 update. SCONUL Focus 52(48).

Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment, Higher Education. 32, 347-364.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871

Bolton, G. (2010). Reflective practice: writing and professional development. (3rd edition). Los Angeles: Sage Publications. 29.

Bowden, J., Hart, G., King, B., Trigwell, K. &Watts, O. (2000). Generic capabilities of ATN University Graduates.

Brew, A. (2003). Teaching and Research: New relationships and their implications for inquiry based teaching and learning in Higher Education. Higher Education Research and Development. 22(1), 3-18.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0729436032000056571

Crosthwaite, C., Cameron, I., Lant, P. &Litster, J. (2006). Balancing Curriculum Processes and content I project centred curriculum- in pursuit of graduate attributes. Chemical Engineering Research and Design. 84(7), 619-628.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1205/cherd.ecesample0607

Cumming, J. (2010). Contextualised performance: reframing the skills debate in research education. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 405-19.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070903082342

Fleming, J., Donovan, D., Beer, C. &Clark, D. (2011).A whole of university approach to embedding graduate attributes: A reflection. Retrieved 1 January, 2015 fromhttps://beerc.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/graduateattributespaper.pdf

Forrest, M.E. (2008). On becoming a critically reflective practitioner. Health Information and Libraries Journal. 25(3), 229-232.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2008.00787.x

Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by Doing. A Guide to Teaching and Learning methods. Further Education Unit, Oxford: Oxford Polytechnic.

Green, W., Hammer, S. &Star, C. (2009). Facing up to the challenge: why is it so hard to develop graduate attributes? Higher Education Research and Development. 28(1), 17-19.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360802444339

Haigh, M. &Clifford, V. (2010). Widening the graduate attribute debate: a Higher education for Global citizenship. Brookes e journal of Learning and Teaching. 2(5), 1-8.

HEA (2012). Perceptions of refocusing the curriculum at Leeds Metropolitan University Phase One of the UG Refocus Evaluation Strategy - A Report prepared by Steve Outram, Academic Lead for Institutional Strategy and Change. The Higher Education Academy.

HEA (2013). Perceptions of refocusing the curriculum at Leeds Metropolitan University Report No. 2 - A Report prepared by Steve Outram, Academic Lead for Leadership and Strategy. The Higher Education Academy.

HEA (2014). Perceptions of refocusing the curriculum at Leeds Metropolitan University: Report No. 3 - A Report prepared by Steve Outram, Academic Lead for Leadership and Strategy, The Higher Education Academy.

Hounsell, D. (2011). Graduates for the 21st Century: Integrating the Enhancement Themes. Quality Assurance Agency.

JISC (2014). Developing Digital Literacies. Retrieved 1 October, 2015 from https://www.jisc.ac.uk/full-guide/developing-digital-literacies

Johns, C. (2000). Becoming a Reflective Practitioner. Oxford: Blackwell Science

Jones, E. &Killick, D. (2007). Internationalisation of the curriculum.In E.Jones &S. Brown (Eds.), Internationalising Higher Education. (pp. 109-119). London: Routledge.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1028315312473655

Jones, E., & Killick, D. (2013). Graduate attributes and the internationalised curriculum: embedding a global outlook in disciplinary learning outcomes. Journal of Studies in International Education. 17(2), 165-182.

Kift, S. (2002). Assuring quality in the casualization of teaching, learning and assessment. Towards best practice for the First year experience. In TeAoHurihiri(Chair) 6th Pacific Rim First Year in Higher Education conference: Changing Agendas, Christchurch NZ, University of Canterbury, 8-10 July 2002.

Killick, D. (2012). Seeing-ourselves-in-the-world: developing global citizenship through international mobility and campus community. Journal of Studies in International Education, 16(4) 372-389.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1028315311431893

Kimber, M. (2003). The tenured “core” and the tenuous “periphery”: the casualization of academic work in Australian Universities. Journal of HE Policy and Management,25(1), 41-50.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13600800305738

Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh J. H. &Whitt, E. J. (2005). Student Success in College: Creating Conditions that Matter. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

Leeds Metropolitan University (2013). Perceptions of refocusing the curriculum at Leeds Metropolitan University: A Report prepared by Steve Outram, Academic Lead for Leadership and Strategy, The Higher Education Academy.

Leeds Metropolitan University (2014). Perceptions of refocusing the curriculum at Leeds Metropolitan University: A Report prepared by Steve Outram, Academic Lead for Leadership and Strategy, The Higher Education Academy.

Leeds Beckett University (2015). Perceptions of refocusing the curriculum at Leeds Beckett University: A Report prepared by Steve Outram, Academic Lead for Leadership and Strategy, The Higher Education Academy.

Leeds Beckett University (2015). Little Book of Graduate Attributes, Leeds Beckett University.

Lian, A. (2012). A dialogic framework for embedding graduate attributes in discipline-based degree curricula. Rangsit Journal of Arts and Sciences, 2(1), 1-14.

Loughran, J. J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: in search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education. 53(1), 33-43.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053001004

Lowden, K., Hall, S., Elliot, D. &Lewin, J. (2011). Employers’ perceptions of the employability skills of new graduates. SCRE Centre at the University of Glasgow.

Moalosi, R., Tunde Oladarin, M. & Uziak, J. (2012). Students’ perspective on the attainment of graduate attributes through a design project. Global Journal of Engineering Education. 14(1), 40-46.

Rae, D. (2006). Entrepreneurial learning: A Conceptual Framework for Technology-based Enterprise. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. 18(1), 39-56.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537320500520494

Sewell, P. & Dacre-Pool, L. (2010). Moving from conceptual ambiguity to operational clarity. Employability, enterprise and entrepreneurship in higher education Education and Training. 52(1), 89-94.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00400911011017708

Sharpe, R. & Beetham, H. (2010) Understanding students’ uses of technology for learning: towards creative appreciation in Sharpe, R.,

Beetham, H. and de Freitas, S. (Eds.) Rethinking Learning for the Digital Age: how Learners shape their experiences(pp. 85-99). Routledge Faber, London.

Silverman, D. (2000). Doing qualitative research: A practice handbook. London: Sage.

Smith, S. & Price, A. (2011). The Institute for Enterprise Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning: history, context, work and issues for future sustainability. (pp. 2-17) Leeds Met Press.

Sumsion, J. & Goodfellow, J. (2004). Identifying generic skills through curriculum mapping: a critical evaluation. Higher Education Research and Development. 23(3), 329-346.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0729436042000235436

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932

Yorke, M. & Harvey, L. (2005). Graduate Attributes and their development. New Directions for Institutional Research 128, 41-58.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ir.162

Downloads

Published

2015-08-17

Issue

Section

Reflective Analysis Papers