Enhancing Students’ Tertiary Blended Learning Experience Through Embedding Digital Information Literacy
Keywords:blended, learning, online, information, literacy
This article argues that integrating practices of digital information literacy can support a learner-centred, developmental blended learning experience. It considers the consequences of blended learning delivery for teachers and students and how the affordances of such delivery might benefit digital information literacy development. Additionally, the article aims to contribute to a discussion about the design of blended learning for digital information literacy development in tertiary institutions.
Bassett, M. (2012). How can web 2.0 support academic literacy development? He Kupu, 3(1), 23-36. Retrieved 2 Feb 2016 from http://www.hekupu.ac.nz/index.php?type=journal&issue=16&journal=274
Bates, T. (2011). Web 2.0-based e-learning. In J. Lee, & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Understanding web 2.0 and its implications for e-learning (pp. 21-42). Hershey PA: Information Science Reference.
Beetham, H. (2013). Designing for active learning in technology-rich contexts. In H. Beetham, & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning (2nd ed., pp. 20-29). New York, NY: Routledge.
Benseman, J., Sutton, A., & Lander, J. (2005). In Ministry of Education, Acts of Teaching. An observation study of New Zealand adult literacy, numeracy and language teachers. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
Bernard, R., Abrami, P., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C., Tamim, R., Surkes, M., & Bethel, E. (2009). A Meta-Analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79 (3, September), 1243-1289.
Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Research into Higher Education: Open University Press.
Bruce, C., Edwards, S., & Lupton, M. (2007). Six frames for information literacy education: A conceptual framework for interpreting the relationships between theory and practice. In S. Andretta (Ed.), Change and challenge: Information literacy for the 21st century (pp. 37-58). Adelaide, Australia: Auslib Press.
Bruce, C. (2004). Information literacy as a catalyst for educational change: A background paper. Paper presented at the "Lifelong Learning: Whose Responsibility and What is Your Contribution? The 3rd International Lifelong Learning Conference, Yeppoon, Queensland, Australia.
Buehl, D. (2009). Classroom strategies for interactive learning (3rd ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association 2009.
Feekery, A. (2013). Conversation and change: Integrating information literacy to support learning in the New Zealand tertiary context (Doctor of Philosophy). Retrieved 2 Feb 2016 from https://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/download/ng/file/group-9705/conversation-and-change-integrating-information-literacy-to-support-learning-in-the-new-zealand-tertiary-context.pdf
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
Gosling, C., & Nix, I. (2011). Supported open learning: Developing an integrated information literacy strategy online. In T. Mackey, & T. Jacobson (Eds.), Teaching information literacy online (pp. 91-108). New York, NY: Neal-Schuman.
Gunn, C. (2013). Promoting learner engagement and academic literacies through blended course design. In C. B. Wankler Patrick (Ed.), Increasing student engagement and retention in e-learning environments: Web 2.0 and blended learning environments (pp. 145-174). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Gunn, C., Hearne, S., & Sibthorpe, J. (2011). Right from the start: A rationale for embedding academic literacy skills in university courses. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 8(1).
Hegarty, B., Penman, M., Kelly, O., Jeffrey, L., Coburn, D., & McDonald, J. (2010). Digital information literacy: Supported development of capability in tertiary environments. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
Hughes, H., Bruce, C., & Edwards, S. (2007). Models for reflecting and learning: A culturally inclusive response to the information literacy imbalance. In S. Andretta (Ed.), Change and challenge: Information literacy for the 21st century (pp. 59-84). Adelaide, Australia: Auslib Press.
Hughes, H. (2006). Responses and influences: A model of online information use for learning. Paper 279. Information Research, 12(1).
Lavoie, D., Rosman, A., & Sharma, S. (2011). Information literacy by design: Recalibrating graduate professional asynchronous online programs. In T. Mackey, & T. Jacobson (Eds.), Teaching information literacy online (pp. 133-158). NY, New York: Neal-Schuman.
Lawrence, J. (2002). The 'deficit-discourse' shift: University teachers and their role in helping first year students persevere and succeed in the new university culture. Paper presented at the 6th Pacific Rim, First Year in Higher Education Conference 2002 [Electronic Resource]: Changing Agendas - Te Ao Hurihuri, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Lea, M. & Street, B. (2006) The ‘Academic Literacies’ Model: Theory and Applications, Theory Into Practice, 45(4), 368-377.
Lillis, T., & Scott, M. (2007). Defining academic literacies research: Issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 5-32. doi:10.1558/japl.v4i1.5
Maybee, C., Bruce, C., Lupton, M. & Rebmann, K. (2013). Learning to use information: Informed learning in the undergraduate classroom. Library & Information Science Research, 35, 200-206. doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2013.04.002
Mayes, T., & de Freitas, S. (2013). Technology-enhanced learning: The role of theory. In H. Beetham, & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning (2nd ed., pp. 20-29). New York, NY: Routledge.
McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. (2011). Pedagogy 2.0: Critical challenges and responses to web 2.0 and social software in tertiary teaching. In M. J. Lee, & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Web 2.0-based e-learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching (pp. 43-69) doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-294-7.ch003
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectivness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3)
New Zealand Council for Educational Research. (2004). Critical success factors and effective pedagogy for e-learning in tertiary education. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
Rogers, P., Graham, C., & Mayes, C. (2007). Cultural competence and instructional design: Exploration research into the delivery of online instruction cross-culturally. Educational Technology Research & Development, 197-217. doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9033-x
Schwenger, B. (2010). Utilising action research and enquiry processes to achieve sustainable academic development. In M. Devlin, J. Nagy and A. Lichtenberg ( Eds.) Research and Development in Higher Education: Reshaping Higher Education, Melbourne (33) 563-572.
Secker, J., & Coonan, E. (2013). Introduction. In J. Secker, & E. Coonan (Eds.), Rethinking information literacy: A practical framework for supporting learning (pp. XV-XXX). Adelaide, Australia: Facet.
Strauss, P., Goodsir, W., & Ferguson, R. (2011). The role of academic literacy in post-graduate hospitality education. Wellington, New Zealand: Ako Aotearoa.
Street, B. (1998). New literacies in theory and practice: What are the implications for language in education? Linguistics and Education, 10(1), 1-24. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(99)80103-X
Tertiary Education Commission. (2008). Learning Progressions for adult literacy and numeracy: Background information. Wellington, New Zealand: Tertiary Education Commission.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation. (2005). Alexandria proclamation on information literacy and Lifelong learning. Retrieved 2 Feb 2016 from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/access-to-knowledge/information-literacy
Walton, G., & Cleland, J. (2013). Becoming an independent learner. In J. Secker, & E. Coonan (Eds.), Rethinking information literacy: A practical framework for supporting learning (pp. 13-26). Adelaide, Australia: Facet.
Whatman, J., Potter, H., & Boyd, S. (2011). Literacy, language and numeracy: Connecting research to practice in the tertiary sector. Wellington, New Zealand: Ako Aotearoa.
Wrathall, K. (2013). Afterword:" Ownership is a flawed concept'. In J. Secker, & E. Coonan (Eds.), Rethinking information literacy: A practical framework for supporting learning (pp. 131-145). Adelaide, Australia: Facet.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.