Collaborative Outcomes Learning Tool (COLT) – A Multi-agency Educational Resource to Support Complex Public Protection Understanding and Practice
Keywords:Public protection, multi-agency, immersive, flexible learning, collaborative
Multi-agency public protection practice has received significant media and government scrutiny in recent years, in response to failings to protect those most vulnerable people in society. Despite an appreciation by agencies that there are resource and outcome benefits to collaborative practice, how safeguarding public protection policy may be integrated into practice and education is often challenging.
Public protection legislation directs core agencies to co-operate and work together with governmental direction setting out key shared safeguarding responsibilities and arrangements for individuals, professional groups and teams. Despite this there still remain difficulties between organisations to understand each other’s priorities and responsibilities. This can then transpose to an individual level where entrenched professional divisions can compromise joint working.
Many health and social care curricula invest in inter-professional education to encourage exploration of information sharing, reporting and case management. However, when public protection issues are considered, uni-professional and inter-professional education tends to focus on single silos of harm, for example child and adult protection, radicalisation or domestic abuse.
This paper discusses the development, application and future possibilities for innovation of a unique educational tool to address this gap in public protection multi-agency education. The tool aims to support understanding of key public protection issues in Scotland by encouraging learners within undergraduate and practice environments to recognise risk, explore overlapping and ‘grey areas’ of harm and understand partner agency best practice and response whilst encouraging cross-sector working, appreciation and support. Through gaining insight into other agencies safeguarding roles the learner has the opportunity to gain a deeper insight and broader perspective of the complexities of interventions beyond their own discipline whilst recognising opportunities for joint resource management.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. New York: General Learning Press.
Baud D., & Pearson, M. (1979). The trigger film: a stimulus for affective learning. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 16, 52-56.
Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection, Turning Experience into Learning. London , Kogan Page.
Brandt, D.A. (1997). Constructivism: teaching for understanding of the Internet Communications of the ACM, 40(10), 112–117.
Braye, S., Orr,D., & Preston-Shoot, M. (2011). Self-neglect and adult safeguarding – findings from research. London: Department of Health.
Campbell, M. (2014). Adult protection training for community nurses: evaluating knowledge following delivery using participant-favoured training methods. The Jnl of Adult Protection, 16(1), 17-28.
Crawford, P., Aubeeluck, A., Brown, B., Cotrel-Gibbons, L., Porock, D. & Baker, C. (2009). An Evaluation of a DVD Trigger Based Assessment of Communication and Care Delivery Skills, Nurse Education Today, 29, 456–463.
Datta, J., & Hart, D. (2008). A Shared Responsibility. Safeguarding arrangements between hospitals and children’s social services. (Recommendations for interagency training). London: National Children’s Bureau.
Dickinson, H. (2008). Evaluating outcomes in health and social care. Bristol: Policy Press
Dickinson, H., & Glasby, J. (2010). Why partnership working doesn't work. Public Management Review, 12(6), 811.
Garrison, R., & Vaughan, N.D. (2008). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
Glen, S., & Moule, P. (Eds.) (2006). E-Learning in Nursing. London: Palgrave
HM Government. (2015). Prevent duty guidance. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/417941/Prevent_Duty_Guidance_for_Scotland.pdf
Issenberg, S.B., McGaghie, W.C., Petrusa, E.R., Gordon, D.L., & Scalese, R.J. (2005). Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Medical Teacher, 27(1), 10-28.
Jensen, K., Adams, J., & Strickland, K. (2014). Inspirational Teaching: Beyond Excellence and Towards Collaboration for Learning with Sustained Impact. Journal Of Perspectives In Applied Academic Practice, 2(2).
Knowles, M.S. (1980). The Modern Practice of Adult Education. Revised edition. Chicago: Association Press/Follett.
Lambert, J. (2006). Digital Storytelling. Capturing Lives, Creating Community. Berkeley: Digital Diner Press.
Leidner, D.E., & Jarvenpaa, S. (1995). The use of information technology to enhance management school education: a theoretical view, MIS Quarterly, 19(3), 265–29.
Nichols, J. (1994). The trigger film in nurse education. Nurse Education Today, 14, 326-330.
Nursing and Midwifery council. (2013). Introduction to safeguarding adults. Retrieved from: http://www.nmc-uk.org/Nurses-and-midwives/Regulation-in-practice/Safeguarding-New/Introduction-to-safeguarding-adults/
Scottish Government, 2010. National Guidance for Child Protection in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
Tsay, M.H., Morgan, G., & Quick, D. (2000). Predicting student's ratings of the importance of strategies to facilitate self-directed distance learning in Taiwan, Distance Education, 21(1), 49–65.
Tufts, K.A., Clements, P.T., & Karlowicz, K.A. (2009). Integrating intimate partner violence content across curricula: Developing a new generation of Nurse Educators. Nurse education today, 29(1), 40-47.
Sinclair, W., Camps, L., & Bibi, F. (2012). Looking after children and young people: Ensuring their voices are heard in the pre-registration nursing curriculum. Nurse Education in Practice, 12(4), 227-231.
Ward, R. (1992). Interactive video: an analysis of its value to nurse education. Nurse Education Today, 12, 464-470.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.