Dusting Off The Reading List: Is it Fit for Purpose?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v4i1.164Keywords:
Programme literature, reading list, creating, updating, writingAbstract
This on the horizon paper presents the early stages of a systematic review of the core reading list for an online undergraduate degree in Childhood Practice at the University of Dundee. The programme is distinct in that all students are working professionals in the field of childcare, drawn from a global community. The review is being carried out to ensure that the new core reading list is fit for this purpose and that its content not only reflects contemporary literature but also the range of students’ workplaces and interests.
The paper discusses the existing literature available on creating reading lists before presenting the methodology and stages to be undertaken in the process of reviewing the core programme reading list. A systematic literature search was completed to identify existing academic papers relating to the creating of reading lists. Pre-study stages already completed include a critique of the current reading lists both at programme and module levels, and the programme staff team having been asked to recommend and share existing books. A literature search has been started to identify existing Library stock of relevance, using the keyword ‘childhood’. A student questionnaire to elicit views on the current reading list was completed as part of programme quality enhancement.
The paper will also discuss the next steps to be taken in the ongoing process of creating the updated reading list. We would now welcome feedback from the academic community on our planned research and suggestions for the programme reading list via the accompanying blog at https://dustingoffthereadinglist.wordpress.com
References
Atkinson, T., Matusevich, M., & Huber, L. (2009). Making Science Trade Book Choices for Elementary Classrooms. The Reading Teacher, 62(6), 484-497.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RT.62.6.3
Atkinson, S., Conway, N., & Taylorson, B. (2010). Reading lists–pitching it right! SCONUL Focus, 50, 75¬79.
Daniels, A., & Squires. M. (2014). Action Research as First Year Faculty: Exploring the Path Less Taken. Networks An Online Journal for Teacher Research, 16(2), 1¬3.
Denzin, N. (2011). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 4th edn. London: SAGE.
Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and the minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2, 34¬36.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
O’Leary, Z. (2014). Doing your Research Project. London: SAGE.
Pine, G. (2009). Teacher Action Research: Building Knowledge Democracies. London: SAGE.
Piscioneri, M., & Hlavac, J. (2012). The minimalist reading model: Rethinking reading lists in arts and education subjects. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 12(4), 24¬45.
Siddal, G., & Rose, H. (2014). Reading lists – time for a reality check? An investigation into the use of reading lists as a pedagogical tool to support the development of information skills amongst Foundation Degree students. Library and Information Research, 38(118), 52¬73.
Stokes, P., & Martin, L. (2008). Reading lists: a study of tutor and student perceptions, expectations and realities. Studies in Higher Education, 33(2),113¬125.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070801915874
Swain, H. (2006). Makeovers for the guides to essential reading. Times Higher Educational Supplement, 20 January 2006, 18–19.
Weick, C. (2003). Out of context: Using metaphor to encourage creative thinking in strategic management courses. Journal of Management Education, 27(3), 323-343.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1052562903027003004
Zimmerman, E. (2009). Reconceptualizing the role of creativity in art education theory and practice. Studies in Art Education, 50(4), 382-399.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.