Understanding the Needs of Masters Dissertation Supervisors: Supporting Students in Professional Contexts
Keywords:dissertation supervision, Masters supervision, supporting supervisors, supervisor needs, professional learning
Despite a wealth of research into the supervision of PhD projects, there is relatively sparse literature to draw on to help with the development of appropriate support for supervisors of independent research projects undertaken at Masters level. Although some sources consider supervision of full-time Masters students, part-time and work based contexts have received little attention. To help bridge this gap, this paper explores the nature of the part-time supervision of Masters students in professional contexts, identifying features that make it distinct from PhD supervision. It draws on questions posed by supervisors in a Scottish School of Education, and reflections on their experiences, to identify challenges and issues that need to be addressed to provide appropriate support. Recommendations are made for strategies to resolve recurring issues and meet supervisors’ needs, and issues for further investigation are identified.
Anderson, C., Day, K., & McLaughlin, P. (2006). Mastering the dissertation: Lecturers’ representations of the purposes and processes of Master’s level dissertation supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 149–168.
Donaldson, G. (2010). Teaching Scotland’s future: report of a review of teacher education in Scotland. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government. Retrieved 2 June 2015, from http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/337626/0110852.pdf
Cornelius, S., Gordon, C., & Schyma, J. (2014). Live online learning: Strategies for the web conferencing classroom. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
de Kleijn, R.A.M., Meijer, P.C., Brekelmans, M., & Pilot, A. (2015). Adaptive research supervision: Exploring expert thesis supervisors’ practical knowledge. Higher Education Research and Development, 35(1), 117–130.
Foucault, M. (1998). The will to knowledge: The history of sexuality. Volume 1. London: Penguin.
Ginn, F. (2014). ‘Being like a researcher’: Supervising masters dissertations in a neoliberalizing university. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 38(1), 106–118.
Grant, B. (2005). Fighting for space in supervision: Fantasies, fairytales, fictions and fallacies. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(3), 337–354.
Grant, B. & Graham, A. (1994). ‘Guidelines for discussion’: A tool for managing postgraduate supervision. In: O. Zuber-Skerritt & Y. Ryan (eds.) Quality in Postgraduate Education (pp. 165–177). London: Kogan.
Grant, B. & Graham, A. (1999). Naming the game: Reconstructing graduate supervision. Teaching in Higher Education, 4(1), 77–89.
Halse, C. (2011). ‘Becoming a supervisor’: The impact of doctoral supervision on supervisors’ learning. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 557–570.
Johnson, C.M. (2001). A survey of current research on online communities of practice. Internet and Higher Education, 4, 45–60.
Knowles, M., Elwood, H. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2011). The Adult Learner. 7th edition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Manathunga, C. & Goozee, J. (2007). Challenging the dual assumption of the ‘always/already’ autonomous student and effective supervisor. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(3), 309–322.
Maunder, R. E., Gordon-Finlayson, A., Callaghan, J., & Roberts. A. (2012). Behind supervisory doors: Taught master’s dissertation students as qualitative apprentices. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 30–38.
McCallin, A. & Nayar, S. (2012). ‘Postgraduate research supervision: a critical review of current practice.’ Teaching in Higher Education, 17(1), 63–74.
McNiff, J. (2014). Writing and Doing Action Research. London: Sage.
Morrison, A. (2012). Professional standards for lecturers in Scotland’s colleges. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government. Retrieved 2 June 2015, from http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/0039/00390659.pdf
Nordentoft, H. M., Thomsen R., & Wichmann-Hansen, G. (2013). Collective academic supervision: A model for participation and learning in higher education. Higher Education, 64, 581–593.
Nussbaum-Beach, S. & Ritter Hall, L. (2012). The connected educator: Learning and leading in a digital age. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
Samara, A. (2006). Group supervision in graduate education: A process of supervision skill development and text improvement. Higher Education Research and Development, 25(2), 115–129.
Seely Brown, J. & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 198–213.
Shannon, A. G. (1995). Research degree supervision: More mentor than master. Australian Universities Review, 2, 12-15.
Sin, C. (2012). Researching research in master’s degrees in Europe. European Educational Research Journal, 11(2), 290–301.
Squire, K., & Johnson. C. (2000). Supporting distributed communities of practice with interactive television. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(1), 23–42.
Weller, M. (2011). The Digital Scholar: How Technology is Transforming Academic Practice. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating Communities of Practice. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press.
Wenger, E., White, N., & Smith, J. D. (2009). Digital Habitats: Stewarding Technology for Communities. USA: CPSquare.
Wisker, G., Robinson, G., & Shacham, M. (2007). Postgraduate research success: Communities of practice involving cohorts, guardian supervisors and online communities. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(3), 301-320.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.