Assessing Quality And Effectiveness In Fully Online Distance Education
Keywords:Online education, teaching and learning pedagogy, distributed learning curriculum models, social constructivism, discussion boards, MOOCs, institutional policy
Online education has developed over the past two decades, initially in response to a desire to provide distance learning opportunities at degree level for remote communities. The University of the Highlands and Islands [UHI] in Scotland has been at the forefront of this. It has been possible to gain degrees using wholly online learning and teaching processes since 1995. In recent years, institutions across the globe have developed learning materials for online learning in order to both supplement the teaching and learning in face-to-face classes and to enable students to undertake entire programmes using online communications. The most recent developments have been in the advent of MOOCS and SPOCS.
This paper seeks to (1) give an overview of the past 20 years of developments in online education, (2) provide a detailed review of recent research relating to standards, satisfaction and effectiveness of online education, (3) consider the costs and benefits across a range of definitions of online education and (4) examine the primary challenges, conflicts and opportunities for online distance learning and teaching in relation to the issues faced by students, educators and institutions.
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC. Retrieved 20 March 2015 from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/changingcourse.pdf
Ash, C., & Bacsich P. (2002). The costs of networked learning. In C. Steeples & C. Jones (Eds.), Networking learning: Perspectives and issues computer supported cooperative work. London: Springer
Baggaley, J. (2013). MOOC rampant. Distance Education, 34(3), 368–378.
Barber, M., Donnelly, K., & Rizvi, S. (2013). An avalanche is coming – higher education and the revolution ahead. London: IPPR.
Barnard, l., Paton, V. O., & Rose, K. (2007). Perceptions of online course communications and collaboration. Online journal of distance learning administration,. 10(4), 1–9.
Barron, A. E., (2003). Course management systems and online teaching. Journal of computing in higher education, 15(1), 128–142.
Belleflamme, P. (2013, 03 April). Will we all soon be hooked on MOOCs? (2) Business Models [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.ipdigit.eu/2013/04/will-we-all-soon-be-hooked-on-moocs-2-business-models/
Bennion, A., Scesa, A., & Williams, R. (2011). The benefits of part-time undergraduate study and UK higher education policy: A literature review. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(2), 145–163.
Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university (pp. 165-203). Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
Birch, D., & Burnett, B. (2009). Bringing academics on board: Encouraging institutionwide diffusion of e-learning environments. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 117–134.
Bishop, M. J., Hyclak, T., & Yerk-Zwickl, S. (2007). The clipper project: Lessons learned teaching an online economics course. Journal of computing in higher education, 18(2), 99–120.
Blackmore, C., Tantam, D., & Deurzen, E. V. (2008). Evaluation of e-learning outcomes: Experience from an online psychotherapy education programme. Open learning, 23(3), 185–201.
Brown, R. E. (2001). The process of community-building in distance learning classes. Journal of asynchronous learning networks, 5(2), 18–35.
Childs, S., Blenkinso, E., Hall, A., & Walton, G. (2005). Effective e-learning for health professionals and students – barriers and their solutions. A systematic review of the literature – findings from the hexl project. Health information and libraries journal, 22(0), 20–32.
Clara, M., & Barbera, E. (2013). Learning online: Massive open online courses (MOOCs). Connectivism and cultural psychology, 34(1), 129–136.
Clarke, T. (2013). The advance of MOOCs (massive open online courses) – The impending globalisation of business education? Education + Training, 55(4/5), 403–413.
Committee of Inquiry into the Changing Learner Experience (CICLE). (2009). Higher education in a web 2.0 world, 570. London: Higher Education Academy and JISC.
Concannon, F., Flynn, A., & Campbell, M. (2005). What campus-based students think about the quality and benefits of e-learning. British journal of educational technology, 36(3), 501–512.
Cowan, T., & Duggleby, J. (2005). Pedagogy and quality assurance in the development of online learning for online instructors. Journal of asynchronous learning networks, 9(4), 1–10.
Dahl, B. (2005). 10 ways to improve online learning. Distance education report, 9(20), 7–8.
Deka, T. S., & McMurry, P. (2006). Student success in face-to-face and distance teleclass environments: A matter of contact? International review of research in open and distance learning, 7(1).
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. (2013). BIS research paper number 130 – The maturing of the MOOC. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
Díaz, L., & Entonado, F. (2009). Are the functions of teachers in e-learning and face-to-face learning environments really different? Journal of educational technology & society, 12(4), 331–343.
Dutton, J., Dutton, M., & Perry, J. (2002). How do online students differ from lecture students? Journal of asynchronous learning networks, 6(1), 1–20.
Fillion, G., Limayem, M., Laferrière, T., & Mantha, R. (2009). Integrating information and communication technologies into higher education: Investigating onsite and online students' points of view. Open learning: The journal of open and distance learning, 24(3), 223–240.
Fox, A. (2013). From MOOCs to SPOCs. Communications of the ACM, 56(12), 38–40.
France, D., & Fletcher, S. (2007). E-learning in the UK: Perspectives from GEES practitioners. Planet – learning and teaching in geography, earth and environmental sciences, 18, 3–5.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.