Online MCQ Assessment Anxiety Amongst 1st Year Psychology Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v3i1.143Keywords:
Higher Education, Academic Practice, EducationAbstract
First year undergraduate students studying psychology online with the University of the Highlands and Islands experienced anxiety while taking the first of two online multiple choice question (MCQ) assessments. The literature reveals that test anxiety, computer anxiety and technostress have been recognised as issues for some time. As a distributed University that relies heavily on online technology, these issues are potentially significant for UHI and other higher education institutions utilising online learning platforms. Feedback from students after the first MCQ assessment revealed that test anxiety, computer anxiety and technostress were all experienced in some form during the deployment of the assessment. Consequentially, steps were taken to mitigate against these reported issues. Detailed technical advice and guidance was issued ahead of the second online MCQ assessment. End of module feedback from students indicated that anxiety-related issues were reduced by the advice issued to them. For subsequent cohorts of students, formative assessments and detailed technical advice and guidance were issued. MCQ tests were reduced from two to one. An examination of assessment pass rates and feedback for this second cohort of students indicated that the use of a formative assessment and detailed technical advice and guidance deployed prior to the summative assessment were effective at ameliorating against online test anxiety. There are a number of factors that might interact in a complex way to affect student performance in an online MCQ test setting. It is important that wherever possible, we deploy assessments that are a valid test of students’ knowledge and understanding of subject material rather than their ability to deal with situations that engender anxiety and stress.
References
Alpert, R., & Haber, R. (1960). Anxiety in academic achievement situations. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 207–215.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0045464
Biggs, J. (1979). Individual differences in study processes and the quality of learning outcomes. Higher Education, 8(4), 381–394.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01680526
Birjandi, P., & Alemi, M. (2010). The Impact of test anxiety on test performance among Iranian EFL learners. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 1(4), 44–58.
Bozionelos, N. (2001). Computer experience: Relationship with computer experience and prevalence. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 213–224.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00039-X
Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58(1), 47–77.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543058001047
Korobili S., Togia A., & Malliari A. (2009). Computer anxiety and attitudes among undergraduate students in Greece. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 399–405.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.011
McKeachie, W. J., Pollie D., & Speisman, J. (1955). Relieving anxiety in classroom examinations. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 50, 93–98.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0046560
Monideepa, T., Qiang, T., & Ragu-Nathan, T. (2011). Crossing to the dark side: Examining creators, outcomes, and inhibitors of technostress. ACM, 54(09), 113–120.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1995376.1995403
Parasuraman, S., & Igbaria , M. (1990). An examination of gender differences in the determinants of computer anxiety and attitudes toward microcomputers among managers. International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 32(3), 327–340.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(08)80006-5
Reber, A. S., & Reber E. S. (2001). Penguine Dictionary of Psychology (3rd ed.). London: Penguine.
Wang, K., Shu, Q., & Tu., K. (2008). Technostress under different organizational environments: Anempirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 3002–3013.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.05.007
Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
