Working in Collaboration: Three PhD Students Trouble Reflexivity

Gemma Anne Yarwood

doi:10.14297/jpaap.v3i2.116

Authors

Gemma Anne Yarwood Manchester Metropolitan University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v3i2.116

Keywords:

Reflexivity, qualitative research, collaboration, PhD narratives,

Abstract

Written by three qualitative researchers at various stages of their research studies, this paper focuses on how their collaborations with each other informed their PhD learning journeys. There are a substantial number of companion textbooks offering guidance on doctoral study. In these, it is commonplace to find discussions about the research relationships between supervisor and student. We argue that there is much less emphasis in this literature on the value of collaborative relationships between doctoral students. Here we focus on how collaborations with each other facilitated opportunities to discuss, interpret and clarify notions of reflexivity, a methodological conundrum we were individually ruminating. We conclude that collaborative relationships between doctoral students can be supportive, fostering clarity of thought and a safe space to work out ideas such as what does reflexivity mean to me? In this paper, we use our own experiences of developing supportive collaborative relationships to encourage others to actively collaborate with those who can provide a critical sounding board.

Author Biography

Gemma Anne Yarwood, Manchester Metropolitan University

Dr Gemma Anne Yarwood is Senior Lecturer and BA (Hons) Social Care Programme Leader at Manchester Metropolitan University, UK. Her research experience includes qualitiatve research, critical discursive psychology, employment and care. G.Yarwood@mmu.ac.uk. Twitter @GemmaYarwood

References

Banister, P., Bunn, G., Burman, E., Daniels, J., Duckett, P., Goodley, D., & Wheelan, P. (Eds.). (2011). Qualitative methods in psychology: A research guide. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Bochner, A. P. (2001). Narrative’s virtues. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(2), 131–157.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107780040100700201

Bolton, G. (2010). Reflective practice writing and professional development (3d ed.). London: Sage.

Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Kogan Page.

Bourke, B. (2014). Positionality: Reflecting on the research process. The Qualitative Report, 19(33), 1–9.

Bristow, A., & Esper, J. (1988). A feminist research ethos. In Nebraska Sociological Feminist Collective (Ed.), A feminist ethic for social science research (pp. 67–81). New York, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.

Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Burr, V. (1995). An introduction to social constructionism. London: Routledge.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203299968

Clancy, M. (2013). Is reflexivity the key to minimising problems of interpretation in phenomenological research? Nurse researcher, 20(6), 12–16.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/nr2013.07.20.6.12.e1209

Coffey, A. (1999). The ethnographic self, fieldwork and the representation of identity. London: Sage Publications.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Cunliffe, A. L. (2009). Reflexivity, learning and reflexive practice. In

S. Armstrong & C. Fukami (Eds.), Handbook in management learning,

education and development (Chp. 23). London: Sage.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9780857021038.n21

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2008). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Doucet, A. (1998). Interpreting mother-work: Linking ontology, theory, methodology and personal biography. Canadian Woman Studies 18, 52–58.

Doucet, A. (2006). Do men mother? Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Doyle, S. (2013). Reflexivity and the capacity to think. Qualitative Health Research, 23(2), 248–255.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732312467854

Eley, A., & Jennings, R. (2005). Effective postgraduate supervision. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Gomm, R. (2008). Social research methodology: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Goodley, D., & Smailes, S. (2011). ‘Positionalities’. In P. Banister, G. Bunn, E. Burman, J. Daniels, P. Duckett, D. Goodley, R. Lawthom, I. Parker, K. Runswick-Cole, J. Sixsmith, S. Smailes, C. Tindall, & P. Wheelan (Eds.) Qualitative methods in psychology: A research guide. Berkshire: Open University Press.

Hall, W. A., & Callery, P. (2001). Enhancing the rigor of grounded theory: Incorporating reflexivity and relationality. Qualitative Health Research, 11(2), 257–272.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104973201129119082

Holloway, I., & Biley, F. (2011). Being a qualitative researcher. Qualitative Health Research, 21(7), 968–975.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732310395607

Knott, C. & Scragg, T. (2013). Reflective practice in social work. London: Learning Matters.

Larrivee, B. (2000). Transforming teaching practice: Becoming the critically reflective teacher. Reflective practice, 1(3), 293–307.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713693162

Mason, J. (2009). Qualitative researching (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

Mauthner, N., & Doucet, A. (2003). Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data analysis. Sociology, 37(3), 413–431.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00380385030373002

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Oakley, A. (2005). The Ann Oakley reader. Middlesex: Penguin Books.

Ogilvie, H., Yarwood, G. A., & Yianni, C. (2012). The ascent of Mount PhD. The Annual Research Institute of Health and Social Change Conference. Manchester: Manchester Metropolitan University, UK.

Ogilvie, H., Yarwood, G.A., & Yianni, C. (2013) Do the write thing. The Annual Research Institute of Health and Social Change Conference. Manchester: Manchester Metropolitan University, UK.

Pelias, R. J. (2009). Pledging personal allegiance to qualitative inquiry. International Review of Qualitative Research, 2(3), 351–356.

Pillow, W. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175–196.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0951839032000060635

Pillow, W. S. (2010). Dangerous reflexivity: Rigour, responsibility and reflexivity in qualitative research. In P. Thomson & M. Walker (Eds.), The Routledge doctoral students companion: Getting to grips with research in education and social sciences (pp. 270–282). London: Routledge.

Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. (2011). Doctoral degree characteristics. Gloucester: QAA.

Rothman, J. (1997). Resolving identity-based conflict in nations, organizations, and communities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Schon, D. A. (1995). Reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Ashgate Publishing

Taylor, C., & White, S. (2000). Practising reflexivity in health and welfare: Making knowledge. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Thomson, P., & Kamler, B. (2010). It’s been said before and we’ll say it again: Research is writing. In P. Thomson & M. Walker (Eds.), The Routledge doctoral students companion: Getting to grips with research in education and social sciences (pp. 149–160). London: Routledge.

Thomson, P., & Kamler, B. (2013). Writing for peer reviewed journals: Strategies for getting published. Oxon: Routledge.

Thomson, P., & Walker, M. (Eds.). (2010). The Routledge doctoral student’s companion: Getting to grips with research in education and social sciences. London: Routledge.

Wessel, J., & Larin, H. (2006). Change in reflections of physiotherapy students over time in clinical placement. Learning in Health and Social Care, 5(3), 119–132.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-6861.2006.00124.x

White, S. (2013). Practising reflexivity: Nurturing humane practice. In J. Parker & M. Doel, Professional social work. London: Learning Matters.

Yarwood, G. A. (2013). Talking about the Personal. Families, Relationships and Societies, 2(3), 441–455. Bristol: Policy Press.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/204674313X664833