Guest Editorial – Designing transition through curriculum: From induction to embedded practice

Authors

  • William Carey University of Salford image/svg+xml
  • Diane Nutt Independent Education Consultant

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56433/a1g00034

Keywords:

curriculum, induction, embedded practice

Abstract

Papers in this sub-section explore curriculum in the broadest sense: not only module or course content, but the designed learning journey, the hidden curriculum, assessment, induction, disciplinary belonging, skills development, professional identity and co-curricular practices that are aligned with learning. Support for those who teach first year students is an important element of this sub-theme. 

We are increasingly seeing approaches designed to support first year student success that align with Kift’s (2009) ‘Second Generation FYE Curriculum Principles’: transition, diversity, design, engagement, evaluation and monitoring. Some articles in this part two focus on one or two of these core principles. Important for this theme within the Special issue is also Butcher et al.s’ (2019) model of curriculum, which includes a range of education related opportunities and experiences. He argues for the addition of co- and extra-curricular, as well as the hidden curriculum. Articles here challenge the narrow view of curriculum as content alone, highlighting the significance of relational (between learners, and between learners/educators) aspects and developmental spaces (real and online) that engage learners and academics. Crucially many of the articles remind us too of those people who enable curriculum development and effectiveness beyond taught content, including: professional learning staff, student counsellors, technical staff and student mentors (though see part 1 for other articles about student mentors). Kift spoke about the importance of getting everyone around the table when designing first year programmes and McIntosh and Nutt (2022) argue for the importance of drawing on a range of roles and expertise to support student success. 

We have already explored (in part 1) the focus on students across some of the papers in this collection, which is where any consideration of supporting student success in a tertiary world should begin, and in this second part of the Special issue students continue to be central to processes, practices and decisions, but the articles here all provide insights into curricula focused activity. 

 

References

Birtill, P., Harris, R., & Pownall, M. (2022). Unpacking your hidden curriculum: a guide for educators. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

Butcher, C., Davies, C., & Highton, M. (2019). Designing learning: From module outline to effective teaching (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429463822

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne, 49(3), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801

Dweck, C. S. (2017). Mindset: Changing the Way You Think to Fulfil Your Potential. Robinson.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum Books.

Gale, T., & Parker, S. (2014). Navigating Change: A Typology of Student Transition in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, 39, 734-753. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.721351

Kift, S. (2009). Articulating a transition pedagogy to scaffold and to enhance the first year student learning experience in Australian higher education: Final report for ALTC Senior Fellowship Program. Australian Learning and Teaching Council. https://transitionpedagogy.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Kift-Sally-ALTC-Senior-Fellowship-Report-Sep-092.pdf

Kift, S., Nelson, K., & Clarke, J. (2010). Transition pedagogy: A third generation approach to FYE: A case study of policy and practice for the higher education sector. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 1(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5204/intjfyhe.v1i1.13

Lizzio, A. (2006). Designing an Orientation and Transition Strategy for Commencing Students. A Conceptual Summary of Research and Practice. First Year Experience Project. Griffith University, Brisbane.

McIntosh, E., & Nutt, D. (2022) The Impact of the Integrated Practitioner: Perspectives on Integrated Practice to Enhance Student Success. Student Success, 13(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.2430

Zawada, C. (2024) Student drop-out and feelings of belonging and mattering in UK undergraduate allied health students. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 31. https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi31.1172

Published

2026-06-09