Digital feedback histories: Tracing the influence of past experiences on undergraduate students’ university transitions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56433/w8sa5633Keywords:
feedback, digital feedback, sociomaterialism, transition to universityAbstract
A persistent challenge in Higher Education (HE) is students’ dissatisfaction with feedback as they transition from school to university. A relatively under-explored aspect of this issue is the role digital technologies may play in shaping students’ perceptions and expectations of feedback – particularly in the shift from low-digital, personal school settings to the highly digital, large-cohort university context.
Limited attention has been paid thus far to how digital technologies in earlier learning contexts might inform students’ expectations and attitudes towards feedback in HE. Much of the current literature explores cultural and linguistic influences on feedback experience or treats technology as overly instrumental or having inherent potential to improve feedback practices. What is missing is a more critical view of the complex ways digital technologies intertwine with experience.
This ‘On the Horizon’ piece draws on preliminary findings from a PhD study following 24 first-year STEM undergraduate students using interviews and diaries. I explore how students’ previous encounters with digital technologies and feedback shapes their perceptions at university. Initial findings, generating using a Reflexive Thematic Analysis approach, indicate two significant themes: the materialisation of care and trust in feedback and the shifting role of peer comparison across educational contexts.
As educators face increasing demands to deliver personalised feedback practices, it is essential to recognise how students’ prior experiences might interplay with their engagement in feedback processes.
References
Biggam, J. (2010). Reducing staff workload and improving student summative and formative feedback through automation: squaring the circle. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies, 2(3-4), 276-287.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide.
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315-1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Dawson, P., Henderson, M., Ryan, T., Mahoney, P., Boud, D., Phillips, M., & Molloy, E. (2023). Technology and feedback design. In Learning, design, and technology: An international compendium of theory, research, practice, and policy (pp. 695-739). Springer.
Elkington, S., & Irons, A. (2025). Formative assessment and feedback in post-digital learning environments: disciplinary case studies in higher education. Taylor & Francis.
Felten, P., & Lambert, L. M. (2020). Relationship-rich education: How human connections drive success in college. Jhu Press.
Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2015). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the socio-material. Routledge.
Gourlay, L., & Oliver, M. (2016). Multimodal longitudinal journaling. The SAGE handbook of e-learning research, 291-312.
Gravett, K. (2022). Feedback literacies as sociomaterial practice. Critical Studies in Education, 63(2), 261-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1747099
Gravett, K., Ajjawi, R., & O Shea, S. (2023). Topologies of belonging in the digital university. Pedagogy, culture & society, 33(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2023.2256342
Gravett, K., & Carless, D. (2023). Feedback literacy-as-event: relationality, space and temporality in feedback encounters. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2189162
Gravett, K., Taylor, C. A., & Fairchild, N. (2021). Pedagogies of mattering: re-conceptualising relational pedagogies in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1989580
Henderson, M., Ryan, T., & Phillips, M. (2019). The challenges of feedback in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), 1237-1252. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1599815
Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157-172.
Lindblom, J. (2014). Meaning-making as a socially distributed and embodied practice. In Aesthetics and the embodied mind: Beyond art theory and the Cartesian mind-body dichotomy (pp. 3-19). Springer.
Morgan, M. (2024). Prior learning experience, study expectations of A-Level and BTEC students on entry to university and the impact of COVID-19. Findings from the undergraduate Pre-Arrival Academic Questionnaire 2019 and 2021. Education Journal Review, 29(3).
Mulcahy, D. (2018). Assembling spaces of learning ‘in’museums and schools: A practice-based sociomaterial perspective. In Spaces of teaching and learning: Integrating perspectives on research and practice (pp. 13-29). Springer.
Nieminen, J. H., Tai, J., Boud, D., & Henderson, M. (2022). Student agency in feedback: beyond the individual. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(1), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1887080
OfS. (2025). National Student Survey data. Retrieved 29 September from https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/data-and-analysis/national-student-survey-data/
Rovagnati, V., Pitt, E., & Winstone, N. (2022). Feedback cultures, histories and literacies: international postgraduate students’ experiences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(3), 347-359. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1916431
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lauren Shields

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.