No Student Left Behind: Scaling Equity and Belonging in First-Year Mathematics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56433/wjcyb397Keywords:
First-Year Experience (FYE) , equity and diversity, self-regulated learningAbstract
This paper describes a three-year institutional journey to enhance equity, engagement, and belonging in first-year mathematics at Nova School of Business and Economics (Nova SBE). The initiative emerged in response to growing diversity among incoming students, who arrive from a wide range of national and international educational systems with varying levels of mathematical preparation. Over time, differences in readiness had translated into persistent achievement gaps and lower confidence among specific student groups, particularly those from under-represented backgrounds.
The project unfolded in three iterative phases. The first, Bridging the Gap (2023/24), introduced instructor-led learning modules, each including a self-paced online quiz, aimed at consolidating core mathematical skills. Data analysis showed that student engagement, measured by quiz attempts, strongly predicted achievement, yet participation was lowest among those most in need of support. The second phase, Closing Equity Gaps (2024/25), implemented a diagnostic assessment that enabled early identification of underprepared students and targeted support through structured workshops. This intervention reduced performance disparities and increased students’ self-efficacy. The current phase, No Student Left Behind (2025/26), expands the approach into a holistic model that integrates diagnostics, active learning, peer mentoring, and community-building to foster belonging and confidence.
Across all phases, the findings demonstrate that equity in mathematics is best achieved through proactive, data-informed, and compassionate pedagogy. The project shows how early assessment, structured support, and relational engagement can transform mathematics from a barrier into a shared academic journey, ensuring that every student can succeed.References
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Colvin, J. W., & Ashman, M. (2010). Roles, risks, and benefits of peer mentoring relationships in higher education. Mentoring & Tutoring, 18(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611261003678879
Crisp, G. (2012). Integrative assessment: Reframing assessment practice for current and future learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.494234
Di Martino, P., Gregorio, F. & Iannone, P. (2022). The transition from school to university in mathematics education research: new trends and ideas from a systematic literature review. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 113(1), 7-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10194-w
Kahu, E. R., & Nelson, K. (2018). Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197
Kift, S., Nelson, K. & Clarke, J. (2010). Transition pedagogy: A third generation approach to FYE - A case study of policy and practice for the higher education sector. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 1(1), 1–20.
https://doi.org/10.5204/intjfyhe.v1i1.13
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
OECD (2021). Education at a glance 2021: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b35a14e5-en
Rylands, L. & Shearman, D. (2018). Mathematics learning support and engagement in first year of engineering. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1447699
Sewell, A. L. (2025). Development of a context-based formative feedback practice framework: A higher education action research project. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 13(2), 31-46.
Thomas, L. (2011). Chapter 1 Institutional Transformation to Engage a Diverse Student Body", Book: Institutional Transformation to Engage a Diverse Student Body, Editors: Liz Thomas and Malcolm Tight, Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3628(2011)6
Thomas, L. (2012). Building student engagement and belonging in higher education at a time of change. Paul Hamlyn Foundation.
Tinto, V. (2012). Completing college: Rethinking institutional action. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226804545.001.0001
Tomlinson, A., & Killingback, C. (2025). Teaching first-year students during transition to higher education: An autoethnographical account. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 13(2), 65-79.
Yorke, M. (2000). The quality of the student experience: What can institutions learn from data relating to non-completion? Quality in Higher Education, 6(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320050001072
Zimmerman, Barry. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice. 41. 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Patricia Xufre, Áurea Quintino, Tânia Zaragoza

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.