No Student Left Behind: Scaling Equity and Belonging in First-Year Mathematics

Authors

  • Patricia Xufre NOVA School of Business and Economics image/svg+xml
  • Áurea Quintino
  • Tânia Zaragoza

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56433/wjcyb397

Keywords:

First-Year Experience (FYE) , equity and diversity, self-regulated learning

Abstract

This paper describes a three-year institutional journey to enhance equity, engagement, and belonging in first-year mathematics at Nova School of Business and Economics (Nova SBE). The initiative emerged in response to growing diversity among incoming students, who arrive from a wide range of national and international educational systems with varying levels of mathematical preparation. Over time, differences in readiness had translated into persistent achievement gaps and lower confidence among specific student groups, particularly those from under-represented backgrounds.

The project unfolded in three iterative phases. The first, Bridging the Gap (2023/24), introduced instructor-led learning modules, each including a self-paced online quiz, aimed at consolidating core mathematical skills. Data analysis showed that student engagement, measured by quiz attempts, strongly predicted achievement, yet participation was lowest among those most in need of support. The second phase, Closing Equity Gaps (2024/25), implemented a diagnostic assessment that enabled early identification of underprepared students and targeted support through structured workshops. This intervention reduced performance disparities and increased students’ self-efficacy. The current phase, No Student Left Behind (2025/26), expands the approach into a holistic model that integrates diagnostics, active learning, peer mentoring, and community-building to foster belonging and confidence.

Across all phases, the findings demonstrate that equity in mathematics is best achieved through proactive, data-informed, and compassionate pedagogy. The project shows how early assessment, structured support, and relational engagement can transform mathematics from a barrier into a shared academic journey, ensuring that every student can succeed.

References

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.

Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354

Colvin, J. W., & Ashman, M. (2010). Roles, risks, and benefits of peer mentoring relationships in higher education. Mentoring & Tutoring, 18(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611261003678879

Crisp, G. (2012). Integrative assessment: Reframing assessment practice for current and future learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.494234

Di Martino, P., Gregorio, F. & Iannone, P. (2022). The transition from school to university in mathematics education research: new trends and ideas from a systematic literature review. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 113(1), 7-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10194-w

Kahu, E. R., & Nelson, K. (2018). Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197

Kift, S., Nelson, K. & Clarke, J. (2010). Transition pedagogy: A third generation approach to FYE - A case study of policy and practice for the higher education sector. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 1(1), 1–20.

https://doi.org/10.5204/intjfyhe.v1i1.13

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

OECD (2021). Education at a glance 2021: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b35a14e5-en

Rylands, L. & Shearman, D. (2018). Mathematics learning support and engagement in first year of engineering. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1447699

Sewell, A. L. (2025). Development of a context-based formative feedback practice framework: A higher education action research project. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 13(2), 31-46.

Thomas, L. (2011). Chapter 1 Institutional Transformation to Engage a Diverse Student Body", Book: Institutional Transformation to Engage a Diverse Student Body, Editors: Liz Thomas and Malcolm Tight, Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3628(2011)6

Thomas, L. (2012). Building student engagement and belonging in higher education at a time of change. Paul Hamlyn Foundation.

Tinto, V. (2012). Completing college: Rethinking institutional action. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226804545.001.0001

Tomlinson, A., & Killingback, C. (2025). Teaching first-year students during transition to higher education: An autoethnographical account. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 13(2), 65-79.

Yorke, M. (2000). The quality of the student experience: What can institutions learn from data relating to non-completion? Quality in Higher Education, 6(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320050001072

Zimmerman, Barry. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice. 41. 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Published

2026-06-09