Blogging as a form of creative authentic assessment for inclusive education.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56433/ba2ete39Keywords:
creative, assessment, sustainable, critical-thinking, employabilityAbstract
Whilst some disciplines in HE encourage creative practices and expression in their assessments, they are less common in others, leading to a disparity in creative skillsets which are beneficial for multiple cognitive activities, such as critical thinking and leadership skills (Karunarathne & Calma, 2023). Educators may also fear that implementing an assessment which has more flexibility and opportunity for students to express themselves in a format which benefits their learning, would be harder to grade in an equitable way. Therefore, creative assessments sometimes pose a risk to educators which could lead to perceived failure and lack of self-efficacy (Creely et al., 2022). Students in turn might feel anxious with different options for assessment and looser ways of presenting knowledge without a more structured and scaffolded approach. However, the implementation of creative, sustainable assessments can be integral in the learning journeys of students to think differently, which can create space for innovation and development of critical thinking skills for employability. This paper explores the use of blog writing as a sustainable creative option in assessing student knowledge and development of reflective practice. It will comment on the prevalence and affectivity of blog writing in the development of IT-based technical skills and in the promotion of original development of ideas, reducing the potential misuse of AI in facilitating learning. It will also comment on the need for sustainable assessments and joy of learning to enhance student engagement and performance.References
Bali, M., Cronin, C & Jhangiani, R.S. (2020, May 11). Framing Open Educational Practices from a Social Justice Perspective. The Open University. Framing Open Educational Practices from a Social Justice Perspective | Journal of Interactive Media in Education
British Science Association (2022, Dec 30). “Lack of connection between creative and STEM subjects is problematic, according to young people.” BSA. https://www.britishscienceassociation.org/news/future-forum-report-2022-published
Brown G. T. L., Hirschfeld G. H. F. (2008). Students’ conceptions of assessment: Links to outcomes. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940701876003
Christie, H., & Morris, N. (2019). Using assessed blogs to enhance student engagement. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(4), 573-585. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1662390
Christie, H., & Morris, N. (2021). Assessment and emotion in higher education: the allure of blogging. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 26(2), 148-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2021.1909922
Creely, E., Henriksen, D., Crawford, R. & Henderson, M. (2021). Exploring creative risk-taking and productive failure in classroom practice. A case study of the perceived self-efficacy and agency of teachers at one school, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42,100951, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100951.
Custin, R., & Barkacs, L. (2010). Developing Sustainable Learning Communities through Blogging. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 4. Microsoft Word - 10547 (aabri.com)
Geser, G.(eds.) (2007). Open educational practices ad resources:OLCOS roadmap 2012. Salzburg, Austrai: Salzburg Research & EduMedia Group. http://www.olcos.org/cms/upload/docs/olcos_roadmap.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.vi1.295
Karunarathne, W., & A. Calma. (2023). “Assessing Creative Thinking Skills in Higher Education: Deficits and Improvements.” Studies in Higher Education,1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2225532.
Meakin, L (2024, May 13). AI and Assessment: Rethinking Assessment Strategies and Supporting Students in appropriate use of AI. MyCollege. AI and assessment: Rethinking assessment strategies and supporting students in appropriate use of AI : My College (chartered.college)
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., &Tan, S. (2023) ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 342–363. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
United Nations (undated). SDG 4. Goal 4 | Department of Economic and Social Affairs (un.org)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Imi Dencer-Brown

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.