Assessing the effectiveness of self-directed learning as a teaching intervention in urban planning education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56433/xbvne763Keywords:
self-directed learning, Action Research, Urban Planning EducationAbstract
Self-directed learning (SDL) is an educational strategy in which students take charge of their own learning. It incorporates the guidance of an instructor in setting learning materials, with students choosing how and when to learn and evaluating their own performance. SDL is utilised in urban planning education and can support the ability of students to address real-world problems they may encounter as a professional planner.
Despite the utilisation of SDL within planning education, there is a limited body of research which assesses the impact of this as a teaching intervention. This paper adds to this body of research through explaining how an Action Research (AR) project was used to assess the impact of an SDL intervention within the University of Dundee’s Urban Conservation module. AR is a method of systematic enquiry used by instructors who wish to review their own practice. This AR project enabled an evaluation of the effectiveness of the SDL teaching intervention.
The outcomes of the pilot AR project provide evidence that the SDL intervention was successful in improving student understanding of a range of urban planning and conservation issues. In addition, it gave the students the opportunity to apply their learning from the module to a real-world context, enhancing their understanding of professional practice. The methodology of the AR project could be applied to assess the impact of SDL across a range of other degree modules. In doing so, instructors should remain conscious of the implications and limitations of SDL as outlined in this paper.
References
Abeyrathne, D. K., & Ekanayake, S. Y. (2019). Self-Directed Learning (SDL) in Higher Education: Practices and Issues. Asian Journal of Electrical Sciences, 9(2), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.51983/ajes-2020.9.2.2555
Ameijde, J. V., Cheng, S., & Wang, H. (2023). Integrating urban analytics into postgraduate urban design pedagogy: A mixed-methods teaching approach to addressing urban liveability. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 44(4), 2350-2363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X231162842
British Council (n.d.). Action research. https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/professional-development/teachers/taking-responsibility/articles/action-research
Campbell, K. (2020). Balancing interaction and learner autonomy in LMS-Based courses. https://elearningindustry.com/balancing-self-directed-learning-and-interactions-in-lms-based-courses
Chukwunemerem, O. P. (2023). Lessons from self-directed learning activities and helping university students think critically’. Journal of Education and Learning, 12(2), 79-87. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v12n2p79
De Burca, J. (2023). Urban planning for resilience: Adapting cities to 21st century challenges. https://constructive-voices.com/urban-planning-for-resilience-adapting-cities-to-21st-century-challenges
Frandsen, M. S., & Anderson, J. (2022). Action research in planning education – lessons from Rosekilde University. In Roij, A. B. (Ed.), Transformative research and higher education (pp. 73-91). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80117-694-120221004
Greene, V. (n.d.). Advantages of self-directed learning: Does limitless access give us limitless potential? NovoEd. https://novoed.com/resources/blog/self-directed-learning/
Graffagnino, M. (n.d.). Action research. https://www.bristol.ac.uk/education/study/continuing-professional-development-cpd/actionresearch/
Han, J., & Heo, S. (2022). Challenges and problems on self-directed learning readiness in non–face-to-face educational settings during COVID-19. Neuroscience and Information Technology, 6(4), 141. https://doi.org/10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2204141
Higgs, J., & Boud, D. (1991). Self-directed learning as part of the mainstream of physiotherapy education. Australian Physiotherapy, 37(4), 245-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60545-6
Lak, A., & Aghamolaei, R. (2019). Evidence-Based urban design studio: An action research approach. Education Action Research, 30(1), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1773889
Lara, L., & Ornes, S. (2018, September 19-21). Academic performance of students of urban design, applying traditional teaching vs PBL. PBL for Sustainable Cities Conference 2018, Bogota, Columbia. https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docman/irua/ced635/157192.pdf
Maruna, M., Rodic. D. M., & Colic, R. (2018). Remodelling Urban planning education for sustainable development: The Case of Serbia. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19(3), (658-680. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-07-2017-0102
Millmore, A. (n.d.). Mentimeter: engaging students with an easy-to-use audience response system. In T. Betts & P. Oprandi (Eds)., 100 ideas for active learning. University of Sussex. https://openpress.sussex.ac.uk/ideasforactivelearning/chapter/mentimeter-engaging-students-with-an-easy-to-use-audience-response-system/
Queens University Belfast (2024). MSc City Planning and Design. https://www.qub.ac.uk/courses/postgraduate-taught/city-planning-design-msc/
Rehmani, A. (2024, July 26). 5 Challenges of self-directed learning we cannot ignore. The VisualSP Blog. https://visualsp.com/blog/5-problems-with-self-directed-learning-we-cannot-ignore/
The University of Edinburgh (2023). Self-directed learning. https://web.inf.ed.ac.uk/cdt/biomedical-ai/student-guide/study-programme/sdl
Times Educational Supplement (n.d.). What is action research? https://www.tes.com/magazine/tes-explains/what-action-research
University of Waterloo (n.d.). Self-directed learning: A four-step process. https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-excellence/catalogs/tip-sheets/self-directed-learning-four-step-process
University College of Estate Management (2024). MSc Urban Planning. https://www.ucem.ac.uk/msc-urban- planning/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sarah Crowe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.