Use of breakout rooms in synchronous online nurse education: A review of the literature to identify implications for simulated practice learning

Authors

  • Demelza Hayer The Open University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56433/vh4ep931

Keywords:

breakout rooms, simulated practice learning, synchronous online nurse education

Abstract

Most synchronous online education video conferencing platforms include a technological function to split the main session into multiple concurrent sessions, known as ‘breakout rooms’. The technological features of breakout rooms may be suitable to support the increasing use of simulated practice learning in nursing education; however, lack of skill and confidence have previously been identified as significant barriers to breakout room use and training for new online learning platforms can focus on technical aspects of using software rather than the specific pedagogical needs of nurse education. This systematic review aimed to understand the current evidence base underpinning use of breakout rooms in synchronous online nurse education and identify implications for simulated practice learning. Papers were identified using the PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews which include searches of databases and registers and subjected to critical appraisal to ensure quality. Five papers were included for review and were subjected to reflexive thematic analysis using the six stages of analysis model. Five themes were identified: preparation, safe environment, innovation, support, and group dynamics. Breakout rooms were utilised to support a diverse range of learning activities compatible with the contexts identified by the Nursing and Midwifery Council for simulated practice learning in nursing education. The technological features of breakout rooms may support simulated practice learning in synchronous online nurse education by providing an environment for authentic, contextualised, and supervised practice experiences. Active learning can be encouraged by nurse educator presence and communication within breakout rooms, as well as planned inclusion of social interactions intended to build a community of support for students.

References

Almendingen, K., Skotheim, T., & Magnus, E.M. (2022). Breakout Rooms Serve as a Suitable Tool for Interprofessional Pre-Service Online Training among Students within Health, Social, and Education Study Programs. Education Sciences, 12(871), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120871

Almendingen, K., Knutsen, I.R., Hjerpaasen, K.J., Henjum, S., & Hakestad, K.A. (2023). "It enables us to reflect more on nutrition": a mixed-methods cross-sectional study on preclinical digital training in nurse education. Education Sciences, 13(32), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010032

Attardi, S. M., Barbeau, M. L., & Rogers, K. A. (2018). Improving Online Interactions: Lessons from an Online Anatomy Course with a Laboratory for Undergraduate Students. Anatomical Sciences Education, 11(6), 592-604. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1776

Bouthillier, M., Canil, A., Cheng, B. Y. C., Label, K., & Dobson, K. L. (2022). Inaugural Pan-Canadian RADGames: Results From a Successful Approach to Radiology Education for Medical Students. Academic Radiology, 30(1), 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2022.07.005

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2020). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Breeze, K., & Holford, N. (2021). Creating playful spaces for creative development of online teaching capacity. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 9(2), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v9i2.485

Brine, J. (2023). Possible sexual dysfunction in traumatically injured clients: improving the approach at initial assessment. British Journal of Nursing, 32(10), 472-476. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2023.32.10.472

Cantey, D.S., Sampson, M., Vaughn, J., & Petsas Blodgett, N. (2021). Skills, community, and rapport: prelicensure nursing students in the virtual learning environment. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 16(4), 384-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2021.05.010

Chandler, K. (2016). Using breakout rooms in online synchronous tutorials. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 4(3), 16-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v4i3.216

Conole, G. (2014, April 7-9). The 7Cs of Learning Design – a new approach to rethinking design practice. [Symposium]. 9th International Conference on Networked Learning, Edinburgh. https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fss/organisations/netlc/past/nlc2014/abstracts/pdf/conole.pdf

Evans, N. (2023). Clinical placements: how do we get the quality and quantity we need?: Ambitions to boost nurse numbers by increasing the size of the student cohort are surely doomed to fail if the shortage of good quality clinical placements is not addressed. Nursing Standard, 38(8), 51-54. https://www-doi-org.libezproxy.open.ac.uk/10.7748/ns.38.8.51.s19

Fujiwara, Y., Amano, I., Ishii, S., Kishi, M., & Koibuchi, N. (2023). Online Physiology Practice with Team-Based Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 22(14), 1435-1443. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S415257

Garner, J., Gillaspy, E., Smith, M., Blackburn, C., Craddock, A., Drew, T., Holmes, S., Jones, R., & Anonymous Service User (2022). Co-producing nurse education with academics, students, service users and carers: lessons from the pandemic. British Journal of Nursing, 31(16), 854-860. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2022.31.16.854

Grammens, M., Voet, M., Vanderlinde, R., Declercq, L., & De Wever, B. (2022). A systematic review of teacher roles and competences for teaching synchronously online through videoconferencing technology. Educational Research Review, 37, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100461

Grøsland, M., Larsen, V.B., Reneflot, A., & Kaldager Hart, R. (2022). The COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on mental health care use among Norwegian students in higher education: a nation-wide register-based pre-post cohort study. BMC Health Services Research, 822(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1838986/v1

Gupta, C., Henein, C., Ashton, C., Makuloluwa, A., & Mathew, R. G. (2023). Development of virtual ophthalmic surgical skills training. Eye, 37, 290-296. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01896-1

Hannan, T. A., Umar, S. Y., Rob, Z., & Choudhury, R. R. (2021). Designing and running an online Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) on Zoom: A peer-led example. Medical Teacher, 43(6), 651-655. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2021.1887836

Harrison, N., Edmonds, M., Meads., C., Abkdulmohdi, N., Prothero, L., & Shaw, S., (2024). Simulation in Nursing Education: An Evidence Base for the Future January 2024. https://www.councilofdeans.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/CoDH-ARU-Simulation-in-Nursing-Education-Report-Jan-2024.pdf

Ingham-Broomfield, R. (2015). A nurses’ guide to Qualitative Research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 32(3), 34-40. https://ajan.com.au/archive/Vol32/Issue3/4Broomfield.pdf

International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning Standards Committee (2016). INACSL standards of best practice: SimulationSM Simulation design. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12(S), S5-S12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.005

Leigh, J., Vasilica, C., Dron, R., Gawthorpe, D., Burns, E., Kennedy, S., Kennedy, R., Warburton, T., & Croughan, C. (2020). Redefining undergraduate nurse teaching during the coronavirus pandemic: use of digital technologies. British Journal of Nursing, 29(10), 566-569. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2020.29.10.566

Liesveld, J., Petrovic, K., & Grohman, S. (2023). Teaching disaster preparedness to pre-licensure students: a collaborative project during the pandemic. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 18(2), 344-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2022.09.009

Moore, M. (1997). Theory of transactional distance In Keegan, D (Ed.), Theoretical Principles of Distance Education (pp. 22-38). Routledge. http://www.c3l.uni-oldenburg.de/cde/found/moore93.pdf

Moster, M., Koklinda, E., Rodeghero, P., and McNeese, N. (2023). Both Side of the Story: Changing the “Pre-existing Culture of Dread” Surrounding Student Teamwork in Breakout Rooms. Proceedings of the Association for Computing Machinery on Human-Computer Interaction, 7(CSCW 1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3579463

Naik, V., & Govindu, A. (2022). Enriching and Energizing the Virtual Classroom using Breakout Sessions: A better experience of Active Learning during Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 35, 129-134. https://dx.doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2022/v35is1/22018

National Health Service England (2023). NHS Long Term Work Force Plan. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/nhs-long-term-workforce-plan-v1.2.pdf

Nursing and Midwifery Council (2020). Emergency Standards for Nursing and Midwifery Education. https://www.nmc.org.uk/standards-for-education-and-training/emergency-education-standards/

Nursing and Midwifery Council (2022). Current Recovery Programme Standards. https://www.nmc.org.uk/globalassets/sitedocuments/education-standards/current-recovery-programme-standards.pdf

Nursing and Midwifery Council (2023a). Simulated Practice Learning. https://www.nmc.org.uk/standards/guidance/supporting-information-for-our-education-and-training-standards/simulated-practice-learning/#_ftnref2

Nursing and Midwifery Council (2023b). Standards for Education and Training. Part 3: Standards for Pre-Registration Nursing Programmes. https://www.nmc.org.uk/globalassets/sitedocuments/standards/2024/standards-for-pre-registration-nursing-programmes.pdf

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Bourton, I., Hoffman, T. C., Murlow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonal, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ, 372(71), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Peramuna Gamage, M., Baskaran, R., Mukhopadhay, S., Dalavaye, N., Leveridge, B., Ganesananthan S., Spencer, R., Manivannan, S., & Zaben, M. (2023). Assessment of Factors That Students Perceive to Affect Their Virtual Learning of Clinical Skills for OSCE. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 7(14), 707-712. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S402920

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice (10th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

Rickman Patrick, S., & Butzlaff, A. (2021). By utilizing technology can nursing students gain more confidence and decrease anxiety when communicating with chronically ill patients about their sexual relationship? Nurse Education Today, 107, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105084

Sullivan, J.M. (2022). Flipping the classroom: an innovative approach to graduate nursing education. Journal of Professional Nursing, 38, 40-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.11.005

The Open University (2013). Innovating Pedagogy 2013. https://ou-iet.cdn.prismic.io/ou-iet/ccc86d85-4101-4c12-aef3-26174411e489_innovating-pedagogy-2013.pdf

The Open University (2014). Advanced Evaluation Using PROMPT. https://www.open.ac.uk/libraryservices/documents/advanced-evaluation-using-prompt.pdf

Downloads

Published

2024-12-20

Issue

Section

Reflective Analysis Papers