Scotland’s Student Learning Experience model: building partnership in quality in a tertiary context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56433/jpaap.v12i2.605Keywords:
Student engagement, student learning experience, tertiary quality, Scottish context, student partnershipAbstract
Since 2003, student engagement has been a key pillar of Scotland’s higher education Quality Enhancement Framework, through which sparqs, Scotland’s pioneering student engagement agency, was founded. A key tool underpinning this has been sparqs’ Student Learning Experience (SLE) model, created in 2006 from Scotland’s quality arrangements for colleges and placed at the heart of sparqs’ course rep training.
The SLE model is designed to support conversations between students and staff to identify priorities to enhance the quality of learning. In 2021, the Scottish Funding Council (SFC) announced the development of a new tertiary quality framework which would aim to put the experiences of students at the centre of the sector’s approach. sparqs identified the potential of the SLE model to fulfill this purpose and in 2021 was commissioned by the SFC to redevelop and embed the model in Scotland’s forthcoming tertiary quality arrangements.
A distinct aspect of the redeveloped SLE model is that the building blocks, lenses and reflective questions are founded upon the views of students across Scotland about what makes an excellent quality learning experience. Throughout 2022 and 2023, sparqs worked with hundreds of students, alongside staff from students’ associations, institutions and sector agencies, to develop the SLE model. That it will remain at the core of course rep training, while also now rooted in quality arrangements, presents a significant opportunity for deeper synergy in understandings of the enhancement of learning and teaching.
This article will introduce the SLE model, how conceptualisation of the student learning experience has evolved in policy, practice and literature, and the methodology behind the creation of the new model. It will then describe applications of the model for practice in academic development, course-level student-staff partnership, and strategies for quality enhancement. The article will conclude with next steps in the future of tertiary quality, in which students can be full, active partners in shaping their learning.
References
Advance HE. (n.d.). UK Professional Standards Framework. Retrieved February 22, 2024, from https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/uk-professional-standards-framework-ukpsf
Cahill, J., Turner, J., & Barefoot, H. (2010). Enhancing the student learning experience: the perspective of academic staff. Educational Research, 52(3), 283-295. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2010.504063
College Development Network. (n.d.). Professional Standards for Lecturers in Scotland's Colleges. Retrieved February 22, 2024, from https://www.cdn.ac.uk/professional-standards/
Education Scotland. (n.d.). Our Best Future: List of Resources. Retrieved February 23, 2024, from https://education.gov.scot/media/dompl4a0/our-best-future-1-list-of-resources.pdf
Ertl, H., & Wright, S. (2008). Reviewing the literature on the student learning experience in higher education. London Review of Education, 6(3), 195-210.
European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education. (n.d.). ESG. Retrieved February 26, 2024, from https://www.enqa.eu/esg-standards-and-guidelines-for-quality-assurance-in-the-european-higher-education-area/
Guppy, N., Verpoorten, D., Boud, D., Lin, L., Tai, J., & Bartolic, S. (2022). The post‐COVID‐19 future of digital learning in higher education: Views from educators, students, and other professionals in six countries. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6), 1750-1765. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13212
HM Inspectorate of Education. (2007). Effective Self-Evaluation Reporting in Scotland's Colleges: a report by HM Inspectorate of Education for the Scottish Further and Higher Education Funding Council. Retrieved February 22, 2024, from https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/id/eprint/6935/1/esersc.pdf
Lowe, C., & Lowe, T. (2023). Accessibility to student engagement opportunities: A focus on ‘hard-to-reach’universities. (pp. 82-93). Routledge. In T. Lowe, Advancing Student Engagement in Higher Education: Reflection, Critique and Challenge (pp. 82-93). Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003271789-8/accessibility-student-engagement-opportunities-cassie-violet-lowe-tom-lowe
McAlpine, L., Oviedo, G., & Emrick, A. (2008). Telling the second half of the story: linking academic development to student experience of learning. . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(6), 661-673. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701772754
Mulvogue, J., Ryan, C., Hunt, S., Cross, M., & Cleary, M. (2023). Promoting positive outcomes in higher education: Supporting undergraduate student mental health and well-being. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 44(7), 673-677. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2022.2116136
National Union of Students. (2015). Comprehensive Guide to Learning and Teaching. Retrieved February 27, 2024, from https://www.nusconnect.org.uk/resources/comprehensive-guide-to-learning-and-teaching-2015
Quality Assurance Agency and Advance HE. (2021). Education for Sustainable Development Guidance. Retrieved February 23, 2024, from https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/education-sustainable-development-guidance
Quality Assurance Agency. (n.d.). The Quality Code. Retrieved February 23, 2024, from https://www.qaa.ac.uk/the-quality-code
Rientes, B., Li, N., & Marsh, V. (2015). Modeling and managing student satisfaction: use of student feedback to enhance learning experience. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Educaton. Retrieved February 22, 2024, from https://oro.open.ac.uk/46057/7/Modelling-and-Managing-Student-Satisfaction-15.pdf
Scottish Funding Council. (2020). Review of Coherent Provision and Sustainability. Retrieved February 22, 2024, from Scottish Funding Council: https://www.sfc.ac.uk/sfccp052020/
Scottish Funding Council. (2021). Coherence and Sustainability: A Review of Tertiary Education and Research. Retrieved February 22, 2024, from https://www.sfc.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/uploadedFiles/coherence-and-sustainability.pdf
Scottish Funding Council. (n.d.). Tertiary Quality Project. Retrieved February 27, 2024, from https://www.sfc.ac.uk/assurance-accountability/learning-quality/tertiary-quality-project/
Scottish Further Education Funding Council and HM Inspectorate of Education. (2004). Standards and Quality in Scottish Further Education Colleges in Academic Years 2004-5 to 2007-8. Edinburgh: Scottish Further Education Funding Council. Retrieved February 22, 2024
sparqs. (2020). Suggested questions for course reps: COVID-19 edition. Retrieved February 22, 2024, from sparqs: https://www.sparqs.ac.uk/upfiles/COVID%20Course%20Rep%20Questions%20and%20Commentary.pdf
sparqs. (2023). Student Learning Experience Model. Retrieved February 26, 2024, from https://www.sparqs.ac.uk/upfiles/SLE_model_digital_resource.pdf
sparqs. (n.d.). Course Rep Training. Retrieved February 22, 2024, from sparqs: https://www.sparqs.ac.uk/students.php?page=207
sparqs. (n.d.). Exploring student engagement with academic staff. Retrieved February 22, 2024, from https://www.sparqs.ac.uk/institute.php?page=92
sparqs. (n.d.). Student Learning Experience (original tool). Retrieved February 22, 2024, from sparqs: https://www.sparqs.ac.uk/resource-item.php?item=205
Varwell, S. (2021). Models for exploring partnership: Introducing sparqs’ student partnership staircase as a reflective tool for staff and students. International Journal for Students as Partners, 107-123. doi:https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v5i1.4452
Zerihun, Z., Beishuizen, J., & Van Os, W. (2012). Student learning experience as indicator of teaching quality. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 24, 99-111. Retrieved from https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/student-learning-experience-as-indicator-of-teaching-quality
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Megan Brown, Simon Varwell
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.