Humanising pedagogic research in higher education: A reflective commentary on a university-wide special interest group
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56433/jpaap.v12i1.594Keywords:
alienation, impact, pedagogic research, professional development, special interest groupAbstract
In this article, we reflect on our efforts supporting an institution-wide special interest group (SIG) on pedagogic research. Initiated by the Academic and Learning Enhancement at the University of Greenwich, the SIG serves as an interdisciplinary and collaborative space for the university community to develop skills and practice in this area. We discuss our practices around the structure and sustainability of the Pedagogic Research SIG, which are characterised by values such as openness, transparency, inclusion, and equity. In the current neo-liberal climate of Higher Education, we advocate for the humanisation of pedagogic practice through a recognition of staff agency, endorsed by a compassionate community of practice. As an antidote to the commodification of academic practice, we suggest a more holistic approach to academic development with an emphasis on authenticity and fulfilment. In the context of the Pedagogic Research SIG, we envision impact as a multidimensional and layered construct, which includes the intellectual, social and personal dimensions of education, emphasising transformation and change with a potential positive effect on individuals, communities and the society within and beyond academia. Our work makes a significant contribution to the scant scholarship on special interest groups in Higher Education with broader implications for academic development and practice.
References
Abed, R., & John-Smith, P. (2016). Evolutionary psychiatry: A new college special interest group. BJPsych Bulletin, 40(5), 233-236. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.115.052407
American Educational Research Association. (2023). About AERA SIGs. https://www.aera.net/About-AERA/Member-Constituents/SIGs
Beech, D. J. (2012). Spirituality in higher education: A special interest group report. Journal for the Study of Spirituality, 2(2), 219-221. https://doi.org/10.1179/jss.2.2.38777603883w7176
British Educational Research Association. (2023). Special interest groups. https://www.bera.ac.uk/communities/special-interest-groups?sort-by=ndate&hidden-keyword=#listing
Brookfield, S. D. (2004). The power of critical theory: Liberating adult learning and teaching. Jossey-Bass
Brookfield, S. D. (2017). Becoming a critically reflective teacher (2nd Edition). Jossey-Bass
Eteokleous-Grigoriou, N., & Ktoridou, D. (2016). Social networking for educational purposes: The development of social-cultural skills through special interest groups. In Mobile Computing and Wireless Networks: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (Ed. M. Khosrow-Pour). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8751-6.ch029
Evans, C., Kandiko Howson, C., Forsythe, A., & Edwards, C. (2021). What constitutes high quality higher education pedagogical research? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(4), 525-546. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1790500
Imperial College London. (2023). Special interest groups (SIGs). https://www.imperial.ac.uk/about/leadership-and-strategy/provost/vice-provost-education/events/special-interest-groups-sigs-/#:~:text=Education%20Special%20Interest%20Groups%20(SIGs,academic%2C%20administrative%2C%20and%20technical.
Jarche, H. (20/11/2011). Bridging the gap: working smarter [Blog post]. https://jarche.com/2011/11/bridging-the-gap-working-smarter/
Jones, C. (2019). Capital, neoliberalism and educational technology. Postdigit Sci Educ, 1, 288-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00042-1
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Lawson, S., Sanders, K., & Smith, L. (2015). Commodification of the information profession: A critique of higher education under neoliberalism. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 3(1), [eP1182]. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1182
Lukes, L. A., Abbot, S., Henry, D., Wells, M., Baum, L., Case, K., Brantmeier, E. J., & Wheeler, L. (2023). Impact of a regional community of practice for academic developers engaged in institution-level support for SoTL. International Journal for Academic Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2022.2135005
Newcastle University (2023). Qualitative SIG. https://research.ncl.ac.uk/ima/qualitativesig/
Radice, H. (2015). How we got here: UK higher education under neoliberalism. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 12(2), 407–418. Retrieved from https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/969
Shulman, L. S., & Shulman, J. H. (2004). How and what teachers learn: A shifting perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36, 257-271.https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000148298
Solomon, S., & Du Plessis, M. (2023). Experiences of precarious work within higher education institutions: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Front. Educ. 8:960649. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.960649
O'Keefe T, & Courtois A. (2019) ‘Not one of the family’: Gender and precarious work in the neoliberal university. Gender Work Organization, 26, 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12346
University of Birmingham. (2023). Academic Programmers Special Interest Group. https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/research/computational-biology/academic-programmers-sig.aspx
University of Greenwich (12 May, 2021). The inaugural academy of marketing visual methods SIG meetup. https://www.gre.ac.uk/events/current-events/faculty-of-business/the-inaugural-academy-of-marketing-visual-methods-sig-meetup
University of Greenwich. (2022). Research and knowledge exchange sub-strategy 2022–30.
University of Warwick (2023). SAPC - digital technologies in primary care special interest group. https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/med/research/hscience/apc/digitalprimarycare/digtechsig/
University of York. (2023). Special interest groups [Website]. https://www.york.ac.uk/healthsciences/closing-the-gap/special-interest-groups/
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Communities of practice are sustained learning partnerships. What they are. https://www.wenger-trayner.com/communities-of-practice/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Suzan Koseoglu, Angeliki Voskou, Stuart Sims
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
