Appreciative Development Research to Support the Teaching Culture of the Academic Staff at University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56433/jpaap.v11i2.544Keywords:
professional development of university teachers, learning culture, institutional learning, cooperation networks, development researchAbstract
The aim of the article is to present the principles of supporting the professional development of the academic staff at Tallinn University and to analyze how the implementation of these principles has worked in practice, as of 2021. We based our analysis on the theoretical view that the professional development of the academic staff at the university is supported in professional communities, because collaborative learning, mainly professional networks and learning communities provide important support in adapting to, understanding and embracing educational changes. This enables the academic staff to take greater responsibility for the development of education both in their organization and in society at large, while changing relationships at the university into more trusting and supportive ones. The need for the study stemmed from the central idea of improving teaching competencies formulated in the development plan of Tallinn University. As a result of the development research, we created a model for supporting the professional development of the academic staff. As a result of the appreciative development research, it became clear that the skills of supporting the lecturers should be learnt in the organization on a daily basis in co-creation and inclusive participation of the parties, which is why it is important to support networking and institutional learning at the university. We present the aspects in which the model has been successfully implemented and the aspects in which there exist further development needs. The study offers one possible practical experience to support the development of the academic staff in the field of academic professional development, using appreciative development research to study and develop the learning culture.
References
Alumäe, T., Tilk, O., & Asadullah. (2018). Advanced Rich Transcription System for Estonian Speech. Human Language Technologies – The Baltic Perspective, 1–8. doi: 10.3233/978-1-61499-912-6-1
Archer, L. (2008). The neoliberal subjects? Young/er academics’ constructions of professional identity. Journal of Education Policy, 23(3), 265–85.
Biesta, G, Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2017). Talking about education: exploring the significance of teacher agency. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(1), 38–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1205143
Blue, S., Shove, E., Carmona, C., & Kelly, M. P. (2016). Theories of practice and public health: understanding (un)healthy practices. Critical Public Health, 26(1), 36–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2014.980396
Bovill, C. (2017). Transforming higher education through student-staff co-creation of learning and teaching. 2nd EuroSoTL conference, June 8–9, 2017 Lund, Sweden.
Brost, C. (2017). Where we are and where we want to be: How a Transfer of Authority by engaging Students as Partners can improve curriculum design in Higher Education. 2nd EuroSoTL conference, June 8–9 2017, Lund, Sweden.
Brouwer, P., Brekelmans, M., Nieuwenhuis, L., & Simons, R.-J. (2012). Communities of practice in the school workplace. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(3), 346–364. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231211223347
Bushe, G. R. (2012) Appreciative inquiry: Theory and critique. In Boje, D., Burnes, B. and Hassard, J. (Eds.) The Routledge Companion to Organizational Change (pp. 87–103). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
Bushe, G. R. (2013), The Appreciative Inquiry Model. In E. H. Kessler, (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Management Theory, (pp 41–45). Sage Publications.
Euler, D. (2010). Shaping learning cultures: a strategic challenge for universities. In U.-D. Ehlers, D. Shenkenberg (Eds.), Changing Cultures in Higher Education (pp. 75–84). Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer.
Collinson, V., & Fedoruk, T. C. (2007). Organizational Learning. Improving Learning, Teaching, and Leading in School Systems. Sage Publication.
Cross, R., Davis, S., & O’Neil, I. (2017). Health Communication. Theoretical and Critical Perspectives. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Elmore, R. (1995). Getting to scale with good education practices. Harvard Educational Review, 66 (1), 1–26. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.g73266758j348t33
Euler, D. (2010). Shaping learning cultures: a strategic challenge for universities. In U.-D. Ehlers, D. Shenkenberg (Eds.) Changing Cultures in Higher Education (pp. 75–84). Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer.
Feixas, M., & Euler, D. (2012). Academics as Teachers: New Approaches to Teaching and Learning and Implications for Professional Development Programmes. The International HETL Review, 2(2), 115–127. Retrieved from https://www.hetl.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/HETLReviewVolume2Article12.pdf
Feixas, M., & Zellweger, F. (2010). Faculty development in context: changing learning cultures in higher education. In U.-D. Ehlers, D. Schneckenberg (Eds.), Changing cultures in higher education (pp. 85–102). Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03582-1_7
Forte, M. A., & Flores, A. M. (2014). Teacher collaboration and professional development in the workplace: A study of Portuguese teachers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 91–105. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2013.763791
Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. Routledge.
Fullan, M. (2009). Large-scale reforms come of age. Journal of Educational Change, 10 (2), 101–113. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10833-009-9108-z
Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2018). Deep learning. Engage the World Change the World. London/Ontario: Corwin/Principals' Council.
Melén Fäldt, M., & Larsson, S. (2017). Exploring a positive approach in facilitating teachers personal and professional development. In The 2nd EuroSoTL conference, June 8-9 2017, Lund, Sweden (pp. 171-176). Lund University. Retrieved from https://konferens.ht.lu.se/fileadmin/_migrated/content_uploads/Mele__n_Fa__ldt_Larsson.pdf
Gaebel, M., & Zhang, T. (2018). Trends 2018: Learning and teaching in the European Higher Education Area. European University Association.
Haridus- ja Teadusministeerium. (2017). Õpikäsitusest ja selle muutumisest. Elukestva õppe strateegia 2020 1eesmärgi selgituseks. [About the approach to learning and its changing. An explanation to the first objective of the lifelong learning strategy 2020]. Retrieved from https://www.hm.ee/sites/default/files/har_min_broshyyr_12lk_est_veebi.pdf.
Harris, S. (2005). Rethinking academic identities in neo-liberal times. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(4), 421–433. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510500238986
Heiskala, R. (2007). Social innovations: Structural and power perspectives. Timo J. Hämäläinen, Risto Heiskala (Eds.), Social Innovations, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, (pp. 52–79). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Johns-Shepherd, L., & Gowing, E. (2007). Beyond the classroom door, beyond the school gates: The imperative for school-to-school networks for professional learning. In J. Pickering, C. Daly, & N. Pachler (Eds.) New designs for teachers’ professional learning (pp. 116–132). London: University of London.
Jõgi, L., Karu, K., & Krabi, K. 2015. Rethinking teaching and teaching practice at university. International Review of Education, 61(1), 61–77. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11159-015-9467-z
Kallio, K-M., Kallio, T. J., Tienari, J., & Hyvonen, T. (2016). Ethos at stake: Performance management and academic work in universities. Work, Employment and Society, 69(3), 685–709. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715596802
Karu K. (2020). Üliõpilaste arusaamad õppimisest ülikoolis: andragoogiline vaade (doktoritöö). [Students’ beliefs about studying at university: an andragogigal view. A doctoral thesis)] Tallinna ülikooli sotsiaalteaduste dissertatsioonid.
Kindsiko, E. 2020. Kas (eestikeelne) õpe ülikoolides hääbub? - Postimees, 12.10. lk 8.
Kogan, M. (2000). Higher Education communities and academic identity. Higher Education Quarterly 54(3), 207–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2273.00156
Kohm, B., & Nance, B. (2009). Creating collaborative cultures. Educational Leadership, 67(2), 67–72. Retrieved from http://pdo.ascd.org/LMSCourses/PD13OC010M/media/Leading_Prof_Learning_M4_Reading301.pdf.
Loogma, K., Tafel-Viia, K., &; Ümarik, M. (2013). Conceptualising educational changes: A social innovation approach. Journal of Educational Change, 14(3), 283–301. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-012-9205-2
Luechauer, D. L., & Shulman, G. M. (1992). Moving from bureaucracy to empowerment: Shifting paradigms to practice what we preach in class. Paper presented at the Annual Midwest Academy of Management, St. Charles. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED360666
Naude, L., & Bezuidenhout, H. (2015). Moving on the continuum between teaching and learning: Communities of practice in a student support programme. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(2), 221–230. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.978752
Peacock, S., DePlacido, C. (2018). Supporting Staff Transitions into Online Learning: A Network Approach. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 67–75.
Plomp, T. (2010). Educational Design Research: An Introduction. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.). An Introduction to Educational Design Research (pp. 9–35). Netzodruk, Enschede: SLO. Netherlands institute for curriculum development.
Põlda, H., & Aava, K. (2016). Muutunud õpikäsituse keeleline konstrueerimine. [The linguistic construction of the changed approach to learning]. Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu aastaraamat, 12, 201–217. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5128/ERYa12.12
Roxå, T., & Mårtensson, K. (2009). Significant conversations and significant networks–exploring the backstage of the teaching arena. Studies in Higher Education, 34(5), 547–559. Retrieved from https://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/saf/share/great-missenden/reference-papers/ RoxaAndMartensson.pdf
Roxaͦ, T., & Maͦrtensson, K. (2016). Developing higher education organisations and evaluating effects. In R. Egger; M. Merkt (Eds.). Teaching Skills Assessments - Qualitätsmanagement and Personalentwicklung in der Hochschullehre (pp. 91–115). Wiesbaden: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802597200
Sarason, S. B. (1990). The Predictable Failure of Educational Reforms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sarv, A. (2013). Õppejõu eneserefleksioon ja professionaalne identiteet (doktoritöö). [The self-reflection and professional identity of the academic staff (a doctoral thesis)] Tartu ülikooli kirjastus.
Serrano, I., & Kreber, C. (2014). Professionalization of the University and the Profession as Macintyrean Practice. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 34(6), 1–14. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11217-014-9453-0
Smith, R. (2016). Organisational Learning: An integrated HR and knowledge management perspective. Routledge.
Sweeney, K. M. (2021). Creating a safe place: Co-teaching as a method to encourage learning and development in the Higher Education classroom. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 9(1), 54–61.
Säljo, R. (2003). Õppimine tegelikkuses. [Learning in reality] AS Võru Täht: Eesti Vabaharidusliidu kirjastus.
Tallinna ülikooli arengukava 2020-2022.The development plan of Tallinn University 2020-2022]. Retrieved from: https://www.tlu.ee/sites/default/files/TUKO/Dokumendid/Arengukava_2020-2022-EN(1).pdf
Tasler, N., & Dale, V., H., M. (2021). Learners, teachers and places: A conceptual framework for creative pedagogies. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 9(1), 2–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v9i1.450
The World University Rankings 2021: methodology. (2020). Times Higher Education. Retrieved from: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/world-university-rankings-2021-methodology
Turner-Wilson, A. (2018). Teaching ‘Networking with Others’: A Reflective Account. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 76–81.
Udam, M., Seema, R., & Mattisen, H. (2015). Eesti kõrgharidus institutsionaalse akrediteerimise tulemuste taustal ehk mida juhid peaksid teadma. [Higher education in Estonia in the light of the results of the accreditation or what the leaders should know] Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri, 3(1), 80–102. doi: https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2015.3.1.04
Uiboleht, K. (2019). The relationship between teaching-learning environments and undergraduate students` learning in higher education: A qualitative multi-case study (doctoral thesis). Tartu Ülikool.
Vadi, M., Reino, A., & Aidla, A. (2014). Õppejõud ja üliõpilane: Rollikäsitluse vaade. [The lecturer and the student. A view of the roles]. Tartu ülikool.
Van Lankveld, T. A. M; Schoonenboom J. I; Volman, M., Croiset, G.; Beishuizen, J. (2017). Developing a Teacher Identity in the University context: A Systematic Review of Literature. Higher Education Research and Development, 36(2), 325–342. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1208154
Vihalemm, T., Keller, M., & Kiisel, M. (2015). From Intervention to Social Change. A Guide to Reshaping Everyday Practices. London: Routledge.
Väljataga, T., Poom-Valickis, K., Rumma, K., & Aus, K. (2020). Transforming higher education learning ecosystem: Teachers’ perspective. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal - IxD&A, 46, 47−69. Retrieved from http://www.mifav.uniroma2.it/inevent/events/idea2010/doc/46_3.pdf
Warde, A., & Southerton, D. (2012). Introduction. COLLeGIUM: Studies Across Disciplines in the Humanities and Social Sciences, 12, 1–24. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10138/34220
Wenger, E. (2009). A social theory of learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.) Contemporary theories of learning, (pp. 209–218). London: Routledge.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Ylänne, J., Postareff, L. & Parpala, A. (2019). The interaction between university teachers’ well-being and their pedagogical competence. Ettekanne EuroSoTL konverentsil 13.-14.06. 2019, Hispaania. Bilbao. Retrieved from https://www.ehu.eus/documents/8301386/10560621/Actas-EuroSoTL-Conference-2019.pdf/1a7d5867-e222-4aab-6f92-a7948f1fbd67?t=1560417459000
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Katrin Karu, Katrin Aava
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
